Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stochastic vendor selection problem: chance-constrained model and genetic algorithms

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a vendor selection problem in which the buyer allocates an order quantity for an item among a set of suppliers such that the required aggregate quality, service, and lead time requirements are achieved at minimum cost. Some or all of these characteristics can be stochastic and hence, we treat the aggregate quality and service as uncertain. We develop a class of special chance-constrained programming models and a genetic algorithm is designed for the vendor selection problem. The solution procedure is tested on randomly generated problems and our computational experience is reported. The results demonstrate that the suggested approach could provide managers a promising way for studying the stochastic vendor selection problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aamer, A. M., & Sawhney, R. (2004). Review of suppliers selection from a production perspective. In IIE annual conference and exhibition conference proceedings (pp. 2135–2140).

  • Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., & Hassini, E. (2007). Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: A review. Computers and Operations Research, 34(12), 3516–3540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunkumar, N., Karunamoorthy, L., Anand, S., & Babu, T. R. (2006). Linear approach for solving a piecewise linear vendor selection problem of quantity discounts using lexicographic method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(11–12), 1254–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. V. (1997). Introduction to stochastic programming. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, S. S., & Zydiak, J. L. (1991). The supplier selection problem: Single vs. multiple objective models. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(4), 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, S. S., Forst, F. G., & Zydiak, J. L. (1991). A multicriteria approach to allocating order quantity among vendors. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 32(3), 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, S. S., Forst, F. G., & Zydiak, J. L. (1993). Vendor selection with price breaks. European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, S. S., Varano, M. W., & Xu, L. (2000). System research, genetic, algorithms, and information systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crama, Y., Pascual, R. J., & Torres, A. (2004). Optimal procurement decisions in the presence of total quantity discounts and alternative product recipes. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, L., & van der Wegen, L. L. M. (2003). Practice and promise of formal supplier selection: A study of four empirical cases. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carvalho, R. A., & Costa, H. G. (2007). Application of an integrated decision support process for supplier selection. Enterprise Information Systems, 1(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., & Roodhooft, F. (2000). An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., & Roodhooft, F. (2005). Constructing a total cost of ownership supplier selection methodology based on activity-based costing and mathematical programming. Accounting and Business Research, 35(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainen, L. (1955). Linear programming in bid evaluations. In Proceedings of the 2nd symposium of linear programming (pp. 29–38). Washington DC.

  • He, S., Song, R., & Chaudhry, S. S. (2000). Fuzzy dispatching model and genetic algorithms for railyards operations. European Journal of Operations Research, 124, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, C., & Freeman, L. M. (1999). Industrial applications of genetic algorithms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2006). An integrated approach using utility theory and chance-constrained programming for supplier quota allocation. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 2(1–2), 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (1999). Uncertain programming. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, K. J., Kim, T. Y., & Min, S. (2005). Using genetic algorithm to support portfolio optimization for index fund management. Expert Systems with Applications, 28(2), 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, A. C. (1989). Allocation of order quantity among vendors. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 25, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., & Davoodi, M. (2006). Genetic algorithm for lot-sizing with supplier selection under fuzzy demand and costs. In M. Ali & R. Dapoigny (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Vol. 403. IEA/AIE 2006 (pp. 1100–1110). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruszczynski, A., & Shapiro, A. (Eds.) (2003). Stochastic programming. In Handbook in operations research and management science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Saravanan, R. (2006). Manufacturing optimization through intelligent techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiromaru, I., Inuiguchi, M., & Sakawa, M. (2000). A fuzzy satisfying method for electric power plant coal purchase using genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operations Research, 126, 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, E. D., Honig, D. P., & Gainen, L. (1954). Linear programming in bid evaluation. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1, 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara, F. E., Khouja, M., & Michalewicz, Z. (2002). An evolutionary algorithm for optimizing material flow in supply chains. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 43, 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. A., Current, J., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohail S. Chaudhry.

Additional information

The authors would like to thank the referees for providing constructive comments that led to an improved version of the paper. Also, this research was partially supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation (60776825)—China, 863 Programs (2007AA11Z208)—China, Doctorate Foundation (20040004012)—China, Villanova University Research Sabbatical Fall 2006, and the National Science Foundation (0332490)—USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, S., Chaudhry, S.S., Lei, Z. et al. Stochastic vendor selection problem: chance-constrained model and genetic algorithms. Ann Oper Res 168, 169–179 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0367-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0367-5

Keywords

Navigation