Skip to main content
Log in

Inventory based allocation policies for flexible servers in serial systems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by an industry example, we study a two-station serial system in which we allocate flexible servers in order to maximize throughput. We investigate two cases which are different in the way that servers work together when at the same station; namely collaboratively or non-collaboratively. For the collaborative case we prove the optimal policy to be such that the servers work together at a single station at any point in time. In addition to the policy being state-dependent, it also follows a switching-curve structure. In the non-collaborative case, on the other hand, it may be optimal to allocate servers to different stations. Some numerical examples and results regarding policy assignments, switching curves, and system throughput are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, H. S., Duenyas, I., & Zhang, R. (1999). Optimal stochastic scheduling of a two-stage tandem queue with parallel servers. Advances in Applied Probability, 31, 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H. S., Duenyas, I., & Lewis, M. E. (2002). Optimal control of a two-stage tandem queuing with flexible servers. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 16, 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andradottir, S., & Ayhan, H. (2005). Throughput maximization for tandem lines with two stations and flexible servers. Operations Research, 53, 516–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andradottir, S., Ayhan, H., & Down, D. G. (2001). Server assignment policies for maximizing the steady-state throughput of finite queuing systems. Management Science, 47, 1421–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andradottir, S., Ayhan, H., & Down, D. G. (2007). Dynamic assignment of dedicated and flexible servers in tandem lines. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 21(4).

  • Bell, S. L., & Williams, R. J. (2001). Dynamic scheduling of a system with two parallel servers in heavy traffic with complete resource pooling: Asymptotic optimality of a continuous review threshold policy. Annals of Applied Probability, 11, 608–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischak, D. P. (1996). Performance of a manufacturing module with moving workers. IIE Transactions, 28, 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A. (1996). Commonalities in reengineered business processes: Models and issues. Management Science, 42, 768–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas, I., Gupta, D., & Olsen, T. L. (1998). Control of a single server tandem queuing system with setups. Operations Research, 46, 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, T. M. (1993). Optimal use of an extra server in a two station tandem queuing network. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 38, 1296–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, B. (1984). Optimal control of interacting service stations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 29(6), 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. M., & Lopez, M. J. (1999). Heavy traffic resource pooling in parallel server systems. Queuing Systems, 33, 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, F. S., & So, K. C. (1996). On the simultaneous optimization of server and work allocations in production line systems with variable processing times. Operations Research, 44, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvani, S. M. R., Posner, M. J. M., & Buzacott, J. A. (1997). A two-stage tandem queue attended by a moving server with holding and switching costs. Queuing Systems, 26, 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S. A. (1975). Applying a new device in the optimization of exponential queuing systems. Operations Research, 23(4), 687–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum, A., & Stoylar, A. L. (2004). Scheduling flexible servers with convex delay costs. Operations Research, 52, 836–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClain, J. O., Thomas, L. J., & Sox, C. (1992). “On the fly” line balancing with very little wip. International Journal of Production Economics, 27, 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostolaza, J., Thomas, L. J., & McClain, J. O. (1990). The use of dynamic (state-dependent) assembly-line balancing to improve throughput. Journal of Manufacturing Operations Management, 3, 105–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandelis, D. G., & Teneketzes, D. (1994). Optimal multiserver stochastic scheduling of two interconnected priority queues. Advances in Applied Probability, 26, 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E. L. (1982). Conditions for characterizing the structure of optimal strategies in infinite horizon dynamic programs. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 36, 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, M. I., & Wein, L. M. (1998). Dynamic scheduling of a two-class queue with setups. Operations Research, 46, 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosberg, Z., Varaiya, P. P., & Walrand, J. C. (1982). Optimal control of service in tandem queues. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(3), 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M. (1970). Applied probability models with optimization applications. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M. (2003). Introduction to probability models (8 ed.) New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squillante, M. S., Xia, C. H., Yao, D. D., & Zhang, L. (2001). Threshold based priority policies for parallel-server systems with affinity scheduling. In Proceedings of 2001 American control conference (pp. 2992–2999).

  • Van Oyen, M. P., & Teneketzis, D. (1994). Optimal stochastic scheduling of forest networks with switching penalties. Advances in Applied Probability, 26, 474–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oyen, M. P., Gel, E. G. S., & Hopp, W. J. (2001). Performance opportunity for workforce agility in collaborative and noncollaborative work systems. IIE Transactions, 33, 761–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J. (2000). On dynamic scheduling of a parallel server system with complete resource pooling. Proceedings of the Fields Institute Workshop on Analysis and Simulation of Communication Networks, 28, 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, G., Sakasegawa, H., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (1992). On optimal arrangement of stations in a tandem queuing system with blocking. Management Science, 38, 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadlav, E., McClain, J. O., & Thomas, L. J. (1996). Self-buffering, self-balancing, self-flushing production lines. Management Science, 42, 1151–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria E. Mayorga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arumugam, R., Mayorga, M.E. & Taaffe, K.M. Inventory based allocation policies for flexible servers in serial systems. Ann Oper Res 172, 1–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0465-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0465-4

Keywords

Navigation