Skip to main content
Log in

Using the bootstrap method to detect influential DMUs in data envelopment analysis

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a statistical approach to handle the problem of detecting influential observations in deterministic nonparametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models. We use the bootstrap method to estimate the underlying distribution for efficiency scores in order to avoid making unrealistic assumptions about the true distribution. To measure whether a specific DMU is truly influential, we employ relative entropy to detect the change in the distribution after the DMU in question is removed. A statistical test has been applied to determine the significance level. Two examples from the literature are discussed and comparisons to previous methods are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P., & Peterson, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. (1993). Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation. Management Science, 39(10), 1265–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27(6), 668–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Boostrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. (1986). Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls. Resources and Energy, 8, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 120(Part iii), 353–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S. (1999). Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). A statistical test for detecting influential observations in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 542–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, B. L., & Triantis, K. P. (1989). The implications of using messy data to estimate production-frontier-based technical efficiency measures. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D. (1988). Service organization productivity management. Canada: The Society of Management Accountants of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (1996). Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. W. (1993). Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. W. (1995). Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, M., & Harker, P. T. (2002). Note: ranking DMU’s with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models. Management Sciences, 48, 705–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2001). Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zijiang Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Wang, X. & Sun, D. Using the bootstrap method to detect influential DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 173, 89–103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0520-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0520-9

Keywords

Navigation