Abstract
In data envelopment analysis (DEA) an inefficient unit can be projected onto an efficient target that is far away, i.e. reaching the target may demand large reductions in inputs and increases in outputs. When the inputs and outputs modifications planned are large, it may be troublesome to carry them out all at once. In order to help an inefficient unit reach a distant target, a strategy of gradual improvements with successive, intermediate targets has been proposed. This paper extends such approach to the variable returns to scale (VRS) case. In the VRS scenario we distinguish between units that are technical efficient and those that are not. On the one hand, for those units that are not technical efficient the proposed approach determines successive intermediate targets leading to the technical efficiency frontier, i.e. the priority for those units is to attain technical efficiency. On the other hand, for those units that are technical efficient but not scale efficient the proposed approach computes a sequence of targets ending in the global efficiency frontier, i.e. when technical efficiency is guaranteed the goal is then to attain global efficiency. In both cases, the successive targets are obtained by iteratively solving specific DEA models that take into account given bounds on the rates of change in inputs and outputs that the unit can implement in each step.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aparicio, J., Ruíz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 209–218.
Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35–44.
Banker, R. D., & Morey, R. C. (1986). Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research, 34(4), 513–520.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.
Bogetoft, P., & Nielsen, K. (2005). Internet based benchmarking. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 195–215.
Camanho, A. S., & Dyson, R. G. (1999). Efficiency, size, benchmarks and targets for bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50, 903–915.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis and Pareto-Koopmans empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91–107.
Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 5–42.
Frei, F. X., & Harker, P. T. (1999). Projections onto efficient frontiers: Theoretical and computational extensions to DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 275–300.
Golany, B. (1988). An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39(8), 725–734.
Golany, B., & Thore, S. (1997). Restricted best practice selection in DEA: An overview with a case study evaluating the socio-economic performance of nations. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 117–140.
González, E., & Álvarez, A. (2001). From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark. European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 512–520.
Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2005). Determining a sequence of targets in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(12), 1439–1447.
Post, T., & Spronk, J. (1999). Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 472–487.
Sherman, H. D., Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 297–315.
Silva Portela, M. C. A., Castro Borges, P., & Thanassoulis, E. (2003). Findind closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: the case of convex and non-convex technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 251–269.
Thanassoulis, E., & Dyson, R. G. (1992). Estimating preferred target input–output levels using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 56, 80–97.
Zhu, J. (1996). Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 136–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lozano, S., Villa, G. Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA. Ann Oper Res 173, 123–136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0583-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0583-7