Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new method for managing the uncertainties in evaluating multi-person multi-criteria location choices, using a perceptual computer

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The international logistics centers choice problem is a very important issue in International logistics. The location choice problem usually involves numbers and words in which all of the criteria are weighted using words and the performance evaluations for all sub-criteria are either numbers or words. How to aggregate all of these data without losing information is a very daunting task using a type-1 fuzzy set (T1 FS) approach. This paper applies a new methodology—Perceptual Computer (Per-C)—to help solve this hierarchical multi-person multi-criteria decision making problem. The Per-C has three components: encoder, computing with words (CWW) engine and decoder. First, the interval approach (IA) is used to obtain interval type-2 fuzzy set (IT2 FS) word models for the words in a pre-specified vocabulary. Second, a linguistic weighted average (LWA) is used to aggregate all the data including numbers and words modeled by IT2 FSs. Finally, a centroid-based ranking method is used to rank the location choices, and a similarity measure is used to obtain similarities of the location choices. The decision-maker decides the winning location choice as the one with the highest ranking and least similarity to other locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. T. (2001). A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C. (2002). An application of fuzzy set theory to the external performance evaluation of distribution centers in logistics. Soft Computing, 6, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. C. (2010). An integrated quantitative and qualitative FMCDM model for location choices. Soft Computing, 14(7), 757–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, A. I., & Díaz, J. A. (2008). Scatter search for the single source capacitated facility location problem. Annals of Operation Research, 157, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., & Captivo, M. E. (2003). A Lagrangean heuristic for a modular capacitated location problem. Annals of Operation Research, 122, 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28, 839–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., & Cheng, S. (2006). Evaluating the main battle tank using fuzzy number arithmetic operations. Defence Science Journal, 56, 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H. M., & Chen, C. T. (2002). Fuzzy credibility relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Information Sciences, 96, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmik, N. N., & Mendel, J. M. (2001). Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Information Sciences, 132(1–4), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. S., Kim, D. S., & Park, J. S. (2000). A new fuzzy resolution principle based on the antonym. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. (1991). A fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method for facilities site selection. International Journal of Production Research, 29(11), 2313–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., & Mendel, J. M. (2008a). Encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets using an interval sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16, 1503–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., & Mendel, J. M. (2008b). Aggregation using the fuzzy weighted average, as computed by the KM algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M. (2001). Uncertain rule-based fuzzy logic system: introduction and new directions. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M. (2002). An architecture for making judgments using computing with words. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 12(3), 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M. (2003). Fuzzy sets for words: a new beginning. In Proc. FUZZY-IEEE 2003 (pp. 37–42). St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M. (2007). Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: an overview. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M. (2007). Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics. Information Sciences, 177, 998–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M., & Wu, D. (2010). Perceptual computing: aiding people in making subjective judgments. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resende, M. G., & Werneck, R. F. (2007). A fast swap-based local search procedure for location problems. Annals of Operation Research, 150, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, P., & Ouwersloot, H. (1992). Ordinal data in multi-criteria decision making, a stochastic dominance approach to sitting nuclear power plants. European Journal of Operational Research, 56, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, A. D., & Trillas, E. (1999). On antonym and negate in fuzzy logic. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 17, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villegas, J. G., Palacios, F., & Medaglia, A. L. (2006). Solution methods for the bi-objective (cost-coverage) unconstrained facility location problem with an illustrative example. Annals of Operation Research, 147, 109–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2007). Enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms. In Proc. NAFIPS 2007, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2007). Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(6), 1145–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2008). Corrections to aggregation using the linguistics weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16(6), 1664–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2009). Enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(4), 923–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2009). A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 179(8), 1169–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1996). Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1999). From computing with numbers to computing with words—from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems. I, Fundamental Theory and Applications, 4, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (2001). A new direction in AI-Toward a computational theory of perceptions. The AI Magazine, 22(1), 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (2005). Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)—An outline. Information Sciences, 172, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (2008). Toward human level machine intelligence—is it achievable? The need for a new paradigm shift. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 3, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Marketing and Logistics, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, 210046, China

    Shilian Han

  2. Signal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90089-2564, USA

    Shilian Han & Jerry M. Mendel

Authors
  1. Shilian Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerry M. Mendel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilian Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, S., Mendel, J.M. A new method for managing the uncertainties in evaluating multi-person multi-criteria location choices, using a perceptual computer. Ann Oper Res 195, 277–309 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0956-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0956-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation