Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian model and numerical algorithm for CBM availability maximization

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider an availability maximization problem for a partially observable system subject to random failure. System deterioration is described by a hidden, continuous-time homogeneous Markov process. While the system is operational, multivariate observations that are stochastically related to the system state are sampled through condition monitoring at discrete time points. The objective is to design an optimal multivariate Bayesian control chart that maximizes the long-run expected average availability per unit time. We have developed an efficient computational algorithm in the semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) framework and showed that the availability maximization problem is equivalent to solving a parameterized system of linear equations. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of our approach, and a comparison with the traditional age-based replacement policy is also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ait Kadi, D., Beaucaire, C., & Cleroux, R. (2006). A periodic maintenance model with used equipment and random minimal repair. Naval Research Logistics, 37, 855–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R., & Hunter, L. (1960). Optimum preventive maintenance policies. Operations Research, 8, 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R., & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing: probability models. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R., Hunter, L., & Proschan, F. (1963). Optimum checking procedures. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 4, 1078–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Daya, M., & Rahim, M. A. (2000). Effect of maintenance on the economic design of \(\bar{X} \) control chart. European Journal of Operational Research, 120, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini, M., & Bevilacqua, M. (2006). A combined goal programming—AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 91, 839–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A., & Sarkar, J. (2000). Availability of a system maintained through several imperfect repairs before a replacement or a perfect repair. Statistics & Probability Letters, 50, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, J. M. (1995). Bayesian process control for attributes. Management Science, 41, 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, C. R., Bowden, R. O., Liew, L., & Pohl, E. A. (2000). Combining preventive maintenance and statistical process control: a preliminary investigation. IIE Transactions, 32, 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. Y., & Trivedi, K. S. (2005). Optimization for condition-based maintenance with semi-Markov decision process. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 90, 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, C. S., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1988). An optimal multigrid algorithm for continuous state discrete time stochastic control. In Proceedings of the 27th conferences on decision and control, Austin, Texas, USA (pp. 1908–1912).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, C. S., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1991). An optimal one-way multigrid algorithm for discrete-time stochastic control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36, 898–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christer, A., Wang, W., & Sharp, J. M. (1997). A state space condition monitoring model for furnace erosion prediction and replacement. European Journal of Operational Research, 101, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grall, A., Berenguer, C., & Dieulle, L. (2002). A condition-based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating systems. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 76, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guihenineuc-Jouyaux, C., & Robert, C. P. (1998). Discretization of continuous Markov chains and Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence assessment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 1055–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Lawsirirat, C. (2006). Strategically optimum maintenance of monitoring-enabled multi-component systems using continuous-time jump deterioration models. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 12, 306–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D. M., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20, 1483–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Makis, V., & Jardine, A. K. S. (2001). Optimal repair/replacement policy for a general repair model. Advances in Applied Probability, 33, 206–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R., Kim, M. J., & Makis, V. (2010). Availability maximization under partial observations (Technical Report MIE-OR-TR2010-10). Available at http://www.mie.utoronto.ca/labs/qrml. Accessed 16 September 2010.

  • Kim, M. J., & Makis, V. (2009). Optimal maintenance policy for a multi-state deteriorating system with two types of failures under general repair. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. J., Makis, V., & Jiang, R. (2010). Parameter estimation in a condition-based maintenance model. Statistics & Probability Letters, 80, 1633–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D., & Makis, V. (2003). Recursive filters for a partially observable system subject to random failure. Advances in Applied Probability, 35, 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makis, V. (2008). Multivariate Bayesian control chart. Operations Research, 56, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makis, V. (2009). Multivariate Bayesian process control for a finite production run. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 795–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makis, V., & Jiang, X. (2003). Optimal replacement under partial observations. Mathematics of Operations Research, 28, 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nenes, G., & Tagaras, G. (2007). The economically designed two-sided Bayesian \(\bar{X} \) control chart. European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provost, S. B., & Rudiuk, E. M. (1996). The exact distribution of indefinite quadratic forms in noncentral normal vectors. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 48, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M., & Banerjee, P. (1993). A generalized model for the economic design of \(\bar{X} \) control charts for production systems with increasing failure rate and early replacement. Naval Research Logistics, 40, 787–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, J., & Chaudhuri, G. (1999). Availability of a system with gamma life and exponential repair time under a perfect repair policy. Statistics & Probability Letters, 43, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, S. H., & Griffith, W. S. (2002). Extended block replacement policy with shock models and used items. European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagaras, G. (1988). An integrated cost model for the joint optimization of process control and maintenance. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 757–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. W. (1996). A linear programming model to manage the maintenance backlog. Omega, 24, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijms, H. C. (1994). Stochastic models—an algorithmic approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. (2000). A model to determine the optimal critical level and monitoring intervals in condition-based maintenance. International Journal of Production Research, 38, 1425–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. (2006). A two-stage prognosis model in condition based maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 182, 1177–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. M., & Makis, V. (2008). Economic and economic-statistical design of a chi-square chart for CBM. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 516–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. B., & Makis, V. (2000). Dynamic response of residuals to external deviations in a controlled production process. Technometrics, 42, 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, T. G., Cassady, C. R., & Schneider, K. (2008). Simultaneous optimization of control chart and age-based preventive maintenance policies under an economic objective. IIE Transactions, 40, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viliam Makis.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The Kolmogorov’s backward differential equations are given by:

Taking Laplace transform of the above equations gives:

where \(\tilde{P}_{ij}(s): = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{ -st}P_{ij}(t)dt \) denotes the Laplace transform of P ij (t). Solving for \(\tilde{P}_{ij}(s) \) gives:

where:

Taking the inverse Laplace transform of above equation gives:

Finally, using the fact that \(\sum_{j \in S_{X}} P_{ij}(t) = 1\), i=0,1, the probability transition matrix is explicitly given by  (3).

Appendix 2

Provost and Rudiuk (1996) showed that any indefinite quadratic form in normal vectors Q=U T AU, where UN d (μ,Σ), can be expressed as the difference of two linear combinations of independent non-central chi-square variables. In particular, let Σ=LL T, and λ 1,…,λ d denote the eigenvalues of L T AL. Then:

where \(W = \sum_{i = 1}^{p} \lambda_{i}\chi_{1}^{2}(\delta_{i}^{2}) \) and \(V= \sum_{i = p + 1}^{k} ( - \lambda_{i})\chi_{1}^{2}(\delta_{i}^{2}) \), and eigenvalues λ i >0 for i=1,…,p,λ i <0 for i=p+1,…,k, and λ i =0 for i=k+1,…,d. The random variables \(\chi_{1}^{2}(\delta_{i}^{2}) \) are distributed i.i.d. chi-square with one degree of freedom and non-centrality parameter \(\delta_{i}^{2} \). Using this fact, the authors were able to derive an explicit formula for the exact distribution function of Q=U T AU, which is stated below.

Theorem 1

(Provost and Rudiuk 1996)

Let \(Q = W - V = \sum_{j = 1}^{t} l_{j}T_{j} - \sum_{j = t + 1}^{t + w}l_{j}T_{j} \) where l j are positive real numbers and the T j are independent non-central chi-square variables with α j degrees of freedom and non-centrality parameter d j ,j=1,…,t+w. Let \(\alpha = \sum_{j = 1}^{t} \alpha_{j} / 2 \) and \(\alpha ' = \sum_{j = t+ 1}^{t + w} \alpha_{j} / 2 \), and b=(β −1+β−1)/2, where β and βsatisfy that |1−β/l j |<1,j=1,…,t, and |1−β′/l j |<1,j=t+1,…,t+w. Then provided α and αare not both nonnegative integers plus 1/2, for q≤0, the distribution function of Q is given by:

and for q>0, the distribution function of Q is given by:

where constants are given by:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, R., Kim, M.J. & Makis, V. A Bayesian model and numerical algorithm for CBM availability maximization. Ann Oper Res 196, 333–348 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-1013-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-1013-1

Keywords

Navigation