Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous-time Markov chain models to estimate the premium for extended hedge fund lockups

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lockup period for investment in a hedge-fund is a time period after making the investment during which an investor cannot freely redeem his investment. Since long lockup periods have recently been imposed, it is important to estimate the premium an investor should expect from extended lockups. For this, Derman et al. (Wilmott J. 1(5–6):263–293, 2009) proposed a parsimonious three-state discrete-time Markov Chain (DTMC) to model the state of a hedge fund, allowing the state to change randomly among the states “good,” “sick” and “dead” every year. In this paper, we propose an alternative three-state absorbing continuous-time Markov Chain (CTMC) model, which allows state changes continuously in time instead of yearly. Allowing more dynamic state changes is more realistic, but the CTMC model requires new techniques for parameter fitting. We employ nonlinear programming to solve the new calibration equations. We show that the more realistic CTMC model is a viable alternative to the previous DTMC model for estimating the premium for extended hedge fund lockups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, V., & Naik, N. Y. (2000). Multi-period performance persistence analysis of hedge funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(3), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. (2011). Many hedge funds still smarting from the financial crisis. The New York Times, April 6.

  • Aigner, P., Beyschlag, G., Frederich, T., Kalepky, M., & Zagst, R. (2012). Modeling and managing portfolios including listed private equity. Computers & Operations Research, 39(4), 753–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Janabi, M. A. M. (2013). Optimal and coherent economic-capital structures: evidence from long and short-sales trading positions under illiquid market perspectives. Annals of Operations Research, 205(1), 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Blackford, S., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Du Croz, J., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S., McKenney, A., & Sorensen, D. (1999). LAPACK user’s guide (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, A., & Bollen, N. P. B. (2009). Lockup up by a lockup: valuing liquidity as a real option. Financial Management, 39(3), 1069–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon, G. (2007). Share restrictions and asset pricing: evidence from the hedge fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(1), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, I., Franzoni, F., & Moussawi, R. (2012). Hedge fund stock trading in the financial crisis of 2007–2008. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(1), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., Li, S., & Zhu, Y. (2010). Hedge fund redemption restrictions, financial crisis, and fund performance (Working paper). Wilfrid Laurier University.

  • Boyson, N., Stulz, R., & Stahel, C. (2010). Hedge fund contagion and liquidity shocks. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1789–1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S. J., Milevsky, M. A., & Salisbury, T. S. (2003). Asset allocation and the liquidity premium for illiquid annuities. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 70(3), 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roon, F. A., Guo, J., & ter Horst, J. R. (2009). Being locked up hurts (SSRN Working paper).

  • Derman, E., Park, K. S., & Whitt, W. (2009). Markov chain models to estimate the premium for the extended hedge fund lockup. Wilmott Journal, 1(5–6), 263–293. Available at http://www.columbia.edu/~ww2040/allpapers.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derman, E., Park, K. S., & Whitt, W. (2010). A stochastic-difference-equation model for hedge-fund relative returns. Quantitative Finance, 10(7), 701–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F. R., & Caglayan, M. O. (2001). Hedge fund performance and manager skill. The Journal of Futures Markets, 21(11), 1003–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golts, M., & Kritzman, M. (2010). Liquidity options. The Journal of Derivatives, 18(1), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. C. (2003). Options, futures, and other derivatives (5th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R., Malakhov, A., & Nonikov, D. (2010). Do hot hands persist among hedge fund managers? An empirical evaluation. The Journal of Finance, 65(1), 217–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S., & Taylor, H. M. (1975). A first course in stochastic processes. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, H. (2010). Asset allocation and illiquidity risk. CAIA Association.

  • Koh, F., Koh, W. T. H., & Teo, M. (2003). Asian hedge funds: return persistence style and fund characteristics (Working Paper). Singapore Management University.

  • Longstaff, F. A. (1995). How much can marketability affect security values? The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1767–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, F. A. (2001). Optimal portfolio choice and the valuation of illiquid securities. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. (2007). Risk measures for hedge funds and a survival analysis. Ph.D thesis, University of Massachusetts.

  • Ross, S. M. (2003). Introduction to probability models (8th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouah, F. (2006). Competing risks in hedge fund survival. Ph.D thesis, McGill University.

  • Schittkowski, K. (1986). Nlqpl: a Fortran-subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems. Annals of Operations Research, 5(2), 485–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, S. V., Rachev, S. T., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2013). Sensitivity of portfolio VaR and CVaR to portfolio return characteristics. Annals of Operations Research, 205(1), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahab, M. I. M., & Lee, C.-G. (2011). Pricing swing options with regime switching. Annals of Operations Research, 185(1), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2010a). Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. (2010b). Enterprise risk management: a DEA VaR approach in vendor selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48(16), 4919–4932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Emanuel Derman for suggesting the lockup premium problem and for his helpful comments on this paper. The second author acknowledges support from NSF grants DMI-0457095 and CMMI-0948190.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Soo Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, K.S., Whitt, W. Continuous-time Markov chain models to estimate the premium for extended hedge fund lockups. Ann Oper Res 211, 357–379 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1496-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1496-z

Keywords

Navigation