Skip to main content
Log in

A general solution for robust linear programs with distortion risk constraints

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linear optimization problems are investigated that have random parameters in their \(m\ge 1\) constraints. In constructing a robust solution \({\mathbf {x}}\in \mathbb {R}^d\), we control the risk arising from violations of the constraints. This risk is measured by set-valued risk measures, which extend the usual univariate coherent distortion (=spectral) risk measures to the multivariate case. To obtain a robust solution in \(d\) variables, the linear goal function is optimized under the restrictions holding uniformly for all parameters in a \(d\)-variate uncertainty set. This set is built from uncertainty sets of the single constraints, each of which is a weighted-mean trimmed region in \(\mathbb {R}^d\) and can be efficiently calculated. Furthermore, a possible substitution of violations between different constraints is investigated by means of the admissable set of the multivariate risk measure. In the case of no substitution, we give an exact geometric algorithm, which possesses a worst-case polynomial complexity. We extend the algorithm to the general substitutability case, that is, to robust polyhedral optimization. The consistency of the approach is shown for generally distributed parameters. Finally, an application of the model to supervised machine learning is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An \(\alpha \)-central region is a set of possible outcome vectors that are taken into reasonable account by the decision maker (dependent on his or her risk posture \(\alpha \)).

  2. Rüschendorf (2013) proposes a different notion of a multivariate distortion risk measure, which is scalar-valued: Given a \(d\)-variate distribution having p.d.f. \(F\), he considers the level set \(Q(t)\) of \(F\) at level \(t\) and defines some scalar measure of \(Q(t)\) as the \(t\)-quantile. Then, based on these scalar-valued quantiles, he introduces multivariate risk measures in the same way as univariate ones.

  3. Here, \(\mathcal{F}\) coincides with the admissable set of the vector-valued multivariate risk measure \(\nu \) described in Bazovkin (2014). This measure consists in the smallest vector which, when being added to the random returns vector \({\mathbf {Y}}\), puts \(-\mu ^m\left( {\mathbf {Y}}+\nu ({\mathbf {Y}})\right) \) into the admissable set. The latter is the set of returns which appear to be acceptable to the risk taker (or the regulator). In this model, we obtain (16) with only \(\mu ^m\) and \(\mathcal{F}\) being involved:

    $$\begin{aligned} \nu (\tilde{\mathbf {A}}{\mathbf {x}}-{\mathbf {b}}) \le {\mathbf {0}}\quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad -\mu ^m(\tilde{\mathbf {A}}{\mathbf {x}}-{\mathbf {b}})\subset \mathcal{F}. \end{aligned}$$
  4. The support function of a set \(S\) in \(\mathbb {R}^m\) is defined as \(h^m_S({\mathbf {p}})=\sup \{ {\mathbf {x}}'{\mathbf {p}}: {\mathbf {x}}\in S\}\), \({\mathbf {p}}\in \mathbb {R}^m\).

  5. Consequently we do not need to calculate WM regions (see Fig. 2).

  6. Thus, the above approach can be also employed as an alternative to the regular simplex method.

References

  • Barber, C. B., Dobkin, D. P., & Huhdanpaa, H. (1996). The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 22, 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazovkin, P. (2014). Geometrical framework for robust portfolio optimization. Discussion Papers in Econometrics and Statistics, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics, University of Cologne (01/14).

  • Bazovkin, P., & Mosler, K. (2012). An exact algorithm for weighted-mean trimmed regions in any dimension. Journal of Statistical Software, 47(13).

  • Ben-Tal, A., Ghaoui, E., & Nemirovski, A. (2009). Robust Optimization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., den Hertog, D., De Waegenaere, A., Melenberg, B., & Rennen, G. (2013). Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Management Science, 59, 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D., & Brown, D. B. (2009). Constructing uncertainty sets for robust linear optimization. Operations Research, 57, 1483–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D., Brown, D. B., & Caramanis, C. (2011). Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Review, 53, 464–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgwardt, K. (2001). Optimierung, Operations Research, Spieltheorie: Mathematische Grundlagen. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, C. E. (1988). A divide-and-conquer algorithm for computing 4-dimensional convex hulls. In Proceedings International Workshop on Computational Geometry on Computational Geometry and its Applications (pp. 113–135). New York: Springer.

  • Cascos, I., & Molchanov, I. (2007). Multivariate risks and depth-trimmed regions. Finance and Stochastics, 11, 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazelle, B. (1993). An optimal convex hull algorithm in any fixed dimension. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 10, 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Sim, M. (2009). Goal-driven optimization. Operations Research, 57, 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Sim, M., Sun, J., & Teo, C. P. (2010). From cvar to uncertainty set: Implications in joint chance-constrained optimization. Operations Research, 58, 470–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delage, E., & Ye, Y. (2010). Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Operations Research, 58, 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbaen, F. (2002). Coherent risk measures on general probability spaces. In Advances in Finance and Stochastics (pp. 1–37). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Dyckerhoff, R., & Mosler, K. (2011). Weighted-mean trimming of multivariate data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102, 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckerhoff, R., & Mosler, K. (2012). Weighted-mean trimming of a probability distribution. Statistics and Probability Letters, 82, 318–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabozzi, F. J., Huang, D., & Zhou, G. (2010). Robust portfolios: Contributions from operations research and finance. Annals of Operations Research, 176, 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer, H., & Schied, A. (2004). Stochastic finance: An introduction in discrete time. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrel, V., Murat, C., & Thiele, A. (2014). Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 235, 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, B. (2003). Convex polytopes (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kall, P., & Mayer, J. (2010). Stochastic linear programming. Models, theory, and computation (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosler, K., & Bazovkin, P. (2014). Stochastic linear programming with a distortion risk constraint. OR Spectrum, 36(4), 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, K., Pachamanova, D., & Sim, M. (2009). Constructing risk measures from uncertainty sets. Operations Research, 57, 1129–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüschendorf, L. (2013). Mathematical risk analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The detailed suggestions of two referees have much improved the clarity and readability of the paper; they are gratefully acknowledged. Pavel Bazovkin was partly supported by a grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Bazovkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bazovkin, P., Mosler, K. A general solution for robust linear programs with distortion risk constraints. Ann Oper Res 229, 103–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1786-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1786-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation