Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A complex adaptive systems approach for productive efficiency analysis: building blocks and associative inferences

  • S.I. : Novel Developments in DEA
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linkages between complex adaptive systems (CAS) thinking and efficiency analysis are in their infancy. This paper associates the basic building blocks of the CAS “flocking” metaphor with the essential building blocks of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) form of productive efficiency analysis. The linkage between these paradigms is made within an agent-based modeling framework we have named the complex adaptive productive efficiency model. Within this framework DEA “decision-making units” (DMUs) representing business units within a management system, are modeled as agents and are therefore known as agent DMU’s (ADMUs). Guided by the three fundamental rules inherent in the flocking metaphor, ADMUs “align” with other ADMUs to achieve mutual protection and reduce risks. They “cohere” with the most efficient ADMUs among them to achieve the greatest possible efficiency in the least possible time. And they “separate” themselves for one another just enough to maintain diversity of operations and avoid unnecessary competition among business units of the management system. Analysis of the resulting patterns of ADMU behavior over time enable policy insights measured against benchmarks of productive efficiency that are both intuitive and evidence-based.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrus, D. C. (2005). The wiki and the blog: Toward a complex adaptive intelligence community. Social Science Network, 49(3), 9.

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorn, N. (1991). Alignment theory: Creating strategic fit. Management Decision, 29(1), 20–24. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/action/doSearch?ContribStored=Chorn%2C+N+H.

  • Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. American Economic Review, 18(Supplement), 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, F. (2014). Complex adaptive systems approach for productive efficiency analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech.

  • Dougherty, F., Ambler, N., & Triantis, K. P. (2015). A complex adaptive systems approach to the analysis of productive efficiency: Formulations. Working paper, Virginia Tech, System Performance Lab.

  • Fisher, L. (2009). The perfect swarm: The science of complexity in everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York, NY: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1999). Emergence: From chaos to order. New York, NY: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2002). Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(6), 988–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence, the connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2004). Strategy maps. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity, life at the edge of chaos. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissack, M., & Letiche, H. (2002). Complexity, emergence, resilience and cohesion gaining perspective on organizations and their study. Emergence, 4(3), 72–94. http://philpapers.org/foundation.

  • Mar-Molinero, C., Prior, D., Segovia, M., & Portillo, F. (2014). On central resource utilization and its allocation by using DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems, computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald, E. M. A., Sipper, M., & Capcarrere, M. S. (1999). Testing for emergence in artificial life. In D. Floreano, J. D. Nicond, & F. Mondada (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth European conference on artificial life (ECAL ’99) (pp. 13–20). Heidleberg: Springer.

  • Rosenhead, J. (1998). Complexity theory and management practice, epistemology of the use & misuse of metaphors from the new sciences. HND—Complexiteitsmanagement. info@ericwil.nl; j.rosenhead@lse.ac.uk, Netherlands.

  • Rungsuriyawiboon, S., & Stefanou, S. E. (2009). Dynamic efficiency estimation: An application to US electric utilities. Agricultural Economics Review, 10(1), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, H. G., Jadbabaie, A., & Pappas, G. J. (2003). Stable flocking of mobile agents Part II: Dynamic topology. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE conference on decision and control (Vol. 2, pp. 2016–2021). Philadelphia, PA: Penn Libraries.

  • Van De Walle, S., & Hammerschmid, G. (2011). The impact of the new public management: Challenges for coordination and cohesion in European public sectors. Halduskultuur-Adminstartive Culture, 12(2), 190–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaneman, W., & Triantis, K. P. (2003). The dynamic production axioms and system dynamics behaviors: The foundation for future integration. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9(1), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicsek, T., Czirok, A., Ben Jacob, E., Cohen, I., & Schochet, O. (1995). Novel type of phase transitions in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters, 75, 1226–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-based Modeling, Northwestern University. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlog/.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is based in part on work supported by the National Science Foundation, while working at the Foundation. Any opinion, finding, and conclusions and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Northern Virginia Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 7054 Haycock Road, Falls Church, VA, 22043, USA

    Francis L. Dougherty, Nathaniel P. Ambler & Konstantinos P. Triantis

Authors
  1. Francis L. Dougherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathaniel P. Ambler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Konstantinos P. Triantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos P. Triantis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dougherty, F.L., Ambler, N.P. & Triantis, K.P. A complex adaptive systems approach for productive efficiency analysis: building blocks and associative inferences. Ann Oper Res 250, 45–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2134-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2134-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation