Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic analysis of the forecasting bankruptcy under presence of unobserved heterogeneity

  • S.I.: Financial Economics
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper illustrates the importance of referring to a dynamic approach when forecasting firms bankruptcies, paying a particular attention to French SMEs. Based on Shummay’s (J Bus 74:101–124, 2001), we build a duration model and extend it by incorporating unobservable heterogeneity. Moreover, we resort to a dynamic dichotomous specification in which “right side” censored data are taken into account. We emphasize the complexity of the calculations of integrals that must be implemented and show how to overcome this challenge by applying the Geweke, Hajivassiliou and Keane algorithm which involves the technique of the simulated maximum likelihood. The findings prove that our dynamic approach, which integrates macroeconomic variables and takes account of both random effects and exogenous shocks, provides credible results. Besides, our method provides the predictive content of macroeconomic variables and the unobservable heterogeneity, which is helpful in forecasting firms bankruptcies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. More anecdotically, we can also mention unexpected risks (fire, equipment failure, etc.), or the aftermath of the bankruptcy of the company’s main customer, or of its biggest supplier. For all these reasons, SMEs generally prefer raising a short-term cash reserve to better absorb possible temporary shocks rather than resorting to debt, at sometimes tough terms.

  2. If one refers to the expertise of the Observatory of Companies at the Banque de France, one must delay the explanatory variables by at least one year. It also calls for delays of two or three years for the ratios used in the discriminant analysis.

  3. This equates obtaining some values of with \(\varepsilon _{i}\sim N\left( 0,\Omega \right) ,\) where \(P=\left[ a_{i1},b_{i1}\right] \times \left[ a_{i2},b_{i2}\right] \times \cdots \times \left[ a_{iK},b_{iK}\right] \).

  4. If \(Z\sim N(0,1)\), then the distribution function of the standard truncated distribution on [ab] is given by the following formula:

    $$\begin{aligned} F(z)=P(Z<z/Z\in [a,b])=\frac{\Phi (z)-\Phi (a)}{\Phi (b)-\Phi (a)}, \end{aligned}$$

    where \(\Phi (z)\) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

    Besides, if random variable U is uniformly distributed on [0, 1], then variable \(F^{-1}(U)\) has F as a cumulative distribution function. To generate iid draws from a normal distribution truncated on [ab], just take the realization of the following random variable:

    $$\begin{aligned} F^{-1}(u)=\Phi ^{-1}\left[ u\left[ \Phi (b)-\Phi (a)\right] +\Phi (a)\right] , \end{aligned}$$

    where u is uniformly distributed on [0, 1].

  5. These variables were also used by Bruneau et al. (2011).

  6. We specify here the ceteris paribus condition. Indeed, for a given level of investment in tangible assets, if the added value increases, then the investment rate decreases. Over the period in question, the company’s default probability will therefore decline, only if the tangible investment level increases more than the value added.

  7. The fact that the estimated results here have the same sign as with Shumway’s estimate exempts us from explaining again the economic relations of the variables considered with the risk of default.

References

  • Abid, I. (2011). Modelling of business failure prediction by statistic and dynamic approaches : neural networks, Bayesian networks, duration and dichotomous models. Thesis. University of Paris West Nanterre, La Defense.

  • Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, E. I., Sabato, G., & Wilson, N. (2010). The value of non-financial information in SME risk management. Journal of Credit Risk, 6(2), 95–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille, E., Bruneau, C., Flageollet, A., & Michaud, F., (2005). Cycle de conjoncture et risque de faillite : un lien ?. Note d’étude et de recherche de l’Observatoire des Entreprises - Banque de France.

  • Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6–8), 613–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brédart, X. (2014). Bankruptcy prediction model: The case of the United States. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(3), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, C., Bandt, O., & El Amri, W., (2011). Macroeconomic fluctuation and corporate financial fragility. NER, Banque de France N\( {{}^\circ } \) 226.

  • Campbell, J. Y., Hilscher, J., & Szilagyi, J. (2008). In search of distress risk. Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2899–2939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, K., Jacoson, T., Lindé, J., & Roszbach, K. (2007). Corporate credit risk modeling and the macroeconomy. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(3), 845–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C., Charitou, A., & Kaourou, F. (2000). Comparative analysis of artificial neural network models: Application in bankruptcy prediction. Annals of Operations Research, 99, 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chava, S., & Jarrow, R. (2004). Bankruptcy prediction with industry effects. Review of Finance, 8(4), 537–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 34, 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2007). Model combination for credit risk assessment: A stacked generalization approach. Annals of Operations Research, 151, 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D., Saita, L., & Wang, K. (2007). Multi-period corporate default prediction with stochastic covariates. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 635–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F. S. (1998). Predicting US recession: Financial variables as leading indicators. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1990). Term structure forecasts of interest rates, inflation, and real returns. Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1991). Efficient simulation from the multivariate normal and student-t distributions subject to linear constraints. In E. M. Keramidas (Ed.), Computing science and statistics: Proceedings of the twenty-third symposium and the interface (pp. 571–578). Interface Foundation of North America Inc., Fairfax.

  • Glennon, D., & Nigro, P. (2005). Measuring the default risk of small business loans : A survival analysis approach. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 37(5), 923–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouriéroux, C., & Monfort, A. (1991). Simulation based inference in models with heterogeneity. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 20(21), 69–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouriéroux, C., & Monfort, A. (1997). Simulation-based econometric methods. Louvain, CORE lectures series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou, V., McFadden, D., & Ruud, P. (1992). Simulation of the multivariate normal orthant probabilities: Methods and programs. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 1021, Yale University.

  • Hardouvels, G., & Estrella, A. (1991). The term structure as a predictor of real economic activity. Journal of Finance, 46(2), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, T., Lindé, J., & Roszbach, K. (2013). Firm default and aggregate fluctuations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(4), 942–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. (1994). A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. Econometrica, 62, 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, S. J., Kraussl, R., Lucas, A., & Monteiro, A. B. (2009). Credit cycles and macrofundamentals. Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroque, G., & Salanié, B. (1993). Simulated-based estimation of model with lagged latent variables. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. W., Kim, T. S., Park, N. J., & Lee, H. K. (2008). Bankruptcy prediction using a discrete-time duration model incorporating temporal and macroeconomic dependencies. Journal of Forecasting, 27(6), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratio and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilyes Abid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abid, I., Mkaouar, F. & Kaabia, O. Dynamic analysis of the forecasting bankruptcy under presence of unobserved heterogeneity. Ann Oper Res 262, 241–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2143-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2143-2

Keywords

Navigation