Skip to main content
Log in

Most unfavorable deductibles and coverage limits for multiple random risks with Archimedean copulas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper has a further study on the insurer’s most unfavorable deductibles and coverage limits for interdependent random losses in the context of the zero-utility premium. For multiple random losses equipped with Archimedean copulas, we conduct stochastic comparison on the insurer’s most unfavorable deductibles and most unfavorable coverage limits, respectively. Also, we build the most unfavorable deductibles for risk-averse insurers. The main results extend and complement those related ones in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A function \(\varphi \) defined on \((0,+\infty )\) is said to be n-monotone if it is differentiable there up to the order \(n-2\) and the derivatives satisfy \((-1)^k\varphi ^{(k)}(t)\ge 0\), for \(k=1,\ldots ,n-2\) and any \(t\in (0,+\infty )\), and further if \((-1)^{(n-2)}\varphi ^{(n-2)}(t)\) is decreasing and convex; here \(\varphi ^{(0)}(t)=\varphi (t)\) and \(\varphi ^{(k)}(t)\) be the kth order derivative evaluated at t.

  2. A random vector \(\varvec{X}\) is said to be positively lower orthant dependent (PLOD) if

    $$\begin{aligned} {\mathrm {P}}\bigg (\bigcap _{i=1}^n\{X_i\le x_i\}\bigg )\ge \prod _{i=1}^n{\mathrm {P}}(X_i\le x_i), \qquad \text{ for } \text{ all } x_i, i=1,\ldots ,n. \end{aligned}$$

    For more we refer readers to Denuit et al. (2005).

  3. A random vector \(\varvec{X}\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\) is comonotonic if \({\mathrm {P}}(\varvec{X}\in B)=1\) for some comonotone subset \(B\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\) such that either \(x_i\le y_i\) or \(x_i\ge y_i\) for \(i=1,\ldots ,n\) whenever both \((x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\) and \((y_1,\ldots ,y_n)\) in B. \(\varvec{X}\) with \(X_1\le _\text {st}\cdots \le _\text {st}X_n\).

References

  • Asimit, A. V., Vernic, R., & Zitikis, R. (2013). Evaluating risk measures and capital allocations based on multi-losses driven by a heavy-tailed background risk: The multivariate Pareto-II model. Risks, 1, 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R. E., & Proschan, F. (1981). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing. Silver Spring, Maryland: To Begin With.

  • Cai, J., & Wei, W. (2014). Some new notions of dependence with applications in optimal allocation problems. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 55, 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. C. (2007). Optimal allocation of upper limits and deductibles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 41, 382–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denuit, M., Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M., & Kaas, R. (2005). Actuarial theory for dependent risks. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelshtain, I., Kella, O., & Scarsini, M. (1999). On risk aversion with two risks. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 31, 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G., Schlesinger, H., & Stapleton, R. C. (2011). Risk taking with additive and multiplicative background risks. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 1547–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., & Wang, R. (2014). Stochastic comparisons and optimal allocation for policy limits and deductibles. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 43, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, L., & Cheung, K. C. (2008a). Stochastic orders of scalar products with applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 865–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, L., & Cheung, K. C. (2008b). Worst allocations of coverage limits and deductibles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas, R., Van Heerwaarden, A. E., & Goovaerts, M. J. (1994). Ordering of actuarial risks. Amsterdam: Caire Education Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzemienowski, A., & Szymczyk, S. (2016). Portfolio optimization with a copula-based extension of conditional value-at-risk. Annals of Operations Research, 237, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Li, X. (2013). Stochastic orders in reliability and risk. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & You, Y. (2012). On allocation of upper limits and deductibles with dependent frequencies and comonotonic severities. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50, 423–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & You, Y. (2014). A note on allocation of portfolio shares of random assets with Archimedean copula. Annals of Operations Research, 212, 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & You, Y. (2015). Permutation monotone functions of random vector with applications in financial and actuarial risk management. Advances in Applied Probability, 47, 270–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Zh Y, & Meng, L. L. (2011). Stochastic comparisons for allocations of upper limits and deductibles with applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of majorization and its applications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risks management (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. J., & Nes̆lehová, J. (2009). Multivariate Archimedean copulas, \(d\)-monotone functions and \(l_1\)-norm symmetric distributions. The Annals of Statistics, 37(5B), 3059–3097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen, B. R. (2006). An introduction to copula. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. (1988). Aversion to one risk in the presence of others. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, A. (1959). Fonctions de rèpartition á n dimensions et leurs marges. Publicationis de l’Institut de Statistique de Paris, 8, 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, M., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic orders. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, S., Racheva-Iotova, B., Rachev, S. T., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2010). Stochastic models for risk estimation in volatile markets: a survey. Annals of Operations Research, 176, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. L. (1980). Probability inequalities in multivariate distributions. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsanakas, A. (2009). To split or not to split: capital allocation with convex risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., & Li, X. (2014). Optimal capital allocations to interdependent actuarial risks. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 57, 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., & Li, X. (2016). Ordering scalar products with applications in financial engineering and actuarial science. Journal of Applied Probability, 53, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, W., Chen, Z., & Hu, T. (2009). Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles under distortion risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohu Li.

Additional information

Dr. Yinping You’s research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11526093).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, Y., Li, X. Most unfavorable deductibles and coverage limits for multiple random risks with Archimedean copulas. Ann Oper Res 259, 485–501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2537-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2537-9

Keywords

Navigation