Abstract
For most companies, operational decisions and financing decisions jointly affect the earnings and efficiency. Although these effects have been studied in various contexts, there is little literature on the dynamic multi-item inventory control problem, especially the case of multi-item product firms which have limited capital and cannot get easy access to external financing. A serious problem is: What are the optimal procurement strategy and financing strategy for a company with a shortage of funds? In this article, we study a dynamic mixed-item inventory control problem where a capital-constrained firm periodically purchases items from suppliers and assembles some items to meet product orders from customers. In the single period, building the traditional model to obtain three inventory strategies. When the capital is sufficient, all items are purchased. When the capital is insufficient, perishable items are purchased. When the capital is appropriate, both perishable items and part of durable items are purchased. In the multi-period, by constructing new variable value to shape two types of functions and sequences, the procurement strategies of manufacturer at different levels of value are obtained. In the financing decision-making, the manufacturer limits the financing due to the limitation of the financing interest rate, so as to further define the concept of the joint bankruptcy point.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archibald, T. W., Thomas, L. C., Betts, J. M., & Johnston, R. B. (2002). Should start-up companies be cautious? Inventory policies which maximise survival probabilities. Management Science, 48(9), 1161–1174.
Benjaafar, S., & Elhafsi, M. (2012). A production-inventory system with both patient and impatient demand classes. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 9(1), 148–159.
Buzacott, J. A., & Zhang, R. Q. (2004). Inventory management with asset-based financing. Management Science, 50(9), 1274–1292.
Chao, X., Chen, J., & Wang, S. (2008). Dynamic inventory management with cash flow constraints. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 758–768.
Chen, X., & Wang, A. (2012). Trade credit contract with limited liability in the supply chain with budget constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 196(1), 153–165.
Coelho, L. C., & Laporte, G. (2014). Optimal joint replenishment, delivery and inventory management policies for perishable products. Computers & Operations Research, 47, 42–52.
Gallego, G., & Hu, M. (2014). Dynamic pricing of perishable assets under competition. Management Science, 60(5), 1241–1259.
Gong, X., Chao, X., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2014). Dynamic inventory control with limited capital and short-term financing. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 61(3), 184–201.
Heising, J. K., Dekker, M., Bartels, P. V., & Van Boekel, M. A. J. S. (2014). Monitoring the quality of perishable foods: Opportunities for intelligent packaging. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54(5), 645–654.
Herbon, A., Levner, E., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2014). Perishable inventory management with dynamic pricing using time–temperature indicators linked to automatic detecting devices. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 605–613.
Hosseini, S. A., & Wadbro, E. (2016). A feasibility evaluation approach for time-evolving multi-item production–distribution networks. Optimization Methods and Software, 31(3), 562–576.
Jaggi, C. K., Tiwari, S., & Goel, S. K. (2017). Credit financing in economic ordering policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with price dependent demand and two storage facilities. Annals of Operations Research, 248(1–2), 253–280.
Katehakis, M. N., Melamed, B., & Shi, J. (2016). Cash-flow based dynamic inventory management. Production and Operations Management, 25(9), 1558–1575.
Li, Y., Zhen, X., & Cai, X. (2016). Trade credit insurance, capital constraint, and the behavior of manufacturers and banks. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 395–414.
Liao, J. J., Huang, K. N., & Chung, K. J. (2013). Optimal pricing and ordering policy for perishable items with limited storage capacity and partial trade credit. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 24(1), 45–61.
Liu, G., Zhang, J., & Tang, W. (2015). Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 397–416.
Nahmias, S., & Pierskalla, W. P. (1976). A two-product perishable/nonperishable inventory problem. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 30(3), 483–500.
Sainathan, A. (2008). Pricing and inventory control policies for perishable products. Social Science Research Network, 11, 538–542.
Song, J. S. (2002). Order-based backorders and their implications in multi-item inventory systems. Management Science, 48(4), 499–516.
Tsao, Y. C., & Sheen, G. J. (2012). A multi-item supply chain with credit periods and weight freight cost discounts. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 106–115.
Xu, X., & Birge, J. R. (2004). Joint production and financing decisions: Modeling and analysis. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.652562.
Acknowledgements
This article was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 71571174) and Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 71731010 and 71631006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The proof of Lemma 1
Finding the first derivatice of formula 1.
As a total of \(c_{m}^{1}c_{k-m}^{1}\) species of products, for any two products \(q_{jg}\) and \(q_{j_{1}g_{1}}\), there are \(\frac{\partial ^{2}V}{\partial q_{jg}\partial q_{j_{1}g_{1}}}=0\). The Hessian matrix is\(\begin{Bmatrix} \frac{\partial ^{2} V_{1}}{\partial q^{2}_{11}}&0&\cdots&0 \\ 0&\ddots&\vdots&\vdots \\ \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&0 \\ 0&0&\cdots&\frac{\partial ^{2} V_{1}}{\partial q^{2}_{c^{1}_{m}c^{1}_{k-m}}}\end{Bmatrix}<0\), so there is only \(q^{*}\) so that formula(1) is optimal. Let \(q_{jg}^{1*}=F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-w_{g}c_{g}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}}\) and \(q_{jg}^{2*}=F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-w_{g}c_{g}-(1+\rho )w_{j}c_{j}}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}})\), then we get \(q^{*}= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{1*}w_{j} &{}\omega \ge \sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{1*}w_{j}{} \\ \\ \frac{\omega \sum _{j=1}^{m}w_{j}}{\sum _{j=1}^{m}w_{j}c_{j}} &{}\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{2*}w_{j}\le \omega < \\ &{}\quad \sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{1*}w_{j}\\ \\ \sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jg}^{2*}w_{j} &{}\omega >\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _ {g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{2*}w_{j}{} \end{array}\right. }\).
The proof of \(q^{*}\) is shown below.
Let \(V^{'}(\omega ,\mathbf {x})=\frac{\partial V}{\partial q_{11}}+\cdots +\frac{\partial v}{\partial q_{jg}}+ \cdots +\frac{\partial v}{\partial q_{c_{m}^{1}c_{k-m}^{1}}}\), then \(V^{'}(\omega ,\mathbf {x})<0\).
- (A)
When \(\omega <\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jg}^{2*}w_{j}c_{j}\),\(V(\omega ,\mathbf {x})\) strictly monotonically increasing, as long as \(q\le q_{jg}^{2*}\), then monotonically. When \(q=q_{jg}^{2*}\), as like Fig. 4, the optimal solution is \(q_{jg}^{2*}\).
- (B)
When \(\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{2*}w_{j}\le \omega < \sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{1*}w_{j}\), \(V(\omega ,\mathbf {x})\) increases monotonically with q, unitl \(q=\frac{\omega }{\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}w_{j}c_{j}}\), then monotonically decreasing, from Fig. 5, we can get optimal solution is \(q=\frac{\omega }{\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}w_{j}c_{j}}\).
- (C)
When \(\omega >\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}q_{jgn}^{2*}w_{j}\),\(V(\omega ,\mathbf {x})\) increases monotonically, unitl \(q=q_{jg}^{1*}\), then monotonically decreasing, as like Fig. 6, the optimal solution is \(q_{jg}^{1*}\). \(\square \)
The proof of Lemma 5
Let \(Q_{jg}^{1}=q_{jgn}w_{j}\),\(Q_{jgn}^{2}=(q_{jgn}-\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})^{+}w_{g}\). According to formula (12) and formula (13) available:
- 1.
When \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}>q_{jgn}\), for any \(j\in {\{1,\ldots ,m\}}\),\(g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}\),the result of the derivation of Eq. (32) is \(p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}-(p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g})F_{jg}(q_{jgN})\). Let it be equal to 0, find the euqation \(F_{jg}(q_{jgN})=\frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}}\). The use of mathematical induction assumes that we have obtained the relevant sequence \(G_{n+1}^{d},\ldots , G_{N}^{d}\) at the time \(n+1\):
$$\begin{aligned} F^{-}_{jg}\left( \frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}\right)\ge & {} a^{d}_{jg1}\ge a^{d}_{jg2}\cdots \ge a^{d}_{jgN} \nonumber \\= & {} F^{-}_{jg}\left( \frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}{\gamma _{g}}}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}}\right) \end{aligned}$$(33)
Then we can find the first derivative and the second derivative of formula (28) respectively:
Therefore, it can be seen from the hypothesis that (35) is less than 0, so \(G_{n}^{d}(Q_{jgn})q_{jgn})\) is a convex function. Assume that \(Q_{jgn}=A_{jg(n+1)}^{d}=a_{jg(n+1)}^{d}w_{j}+(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d}-\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})^{+}w_{g}\) is equal to 0 in the second term on the right side of formula (35) and the first item is positive. So \(\frac{dG_{n}^{d}}{dq_{jgn}}(A_{jg(n+1)}^{d}(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d}))\ge 0\),and \(A_{jgn}^{d}\ge A_{jg(n+1)}^{d}(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d})\). when \(q_{jgn}=F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}})\), the first items on the right side of formula (35) is 0, and because \(A_{jg(n+1)}^{d}(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d})\) is maximum value, so \(a_{jgn}^{d}\le F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}})\), and the second term on the right is always negative. At same time:
And, \(A_{jgn}^{d}(a_{jgn}^{d})\ge A_{jgn}^{br}(a_{jgn}^{br})\), we get \(a_{jgn}^{d}\ge a_{jgn}^{br}\). According to (36) when \(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d}\le F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+\rho (0))w_{j}c_{j}}{p_{jg}-w{g}c_{g}-w_{j}c_{j}}\), then \(\frac{dG_{n}^{br}}{dq_{jgn}}(A_{jgn}^{d}(a_{jgn}^{d}))\ge 0\), \(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d}\le a_{jgn}^{br}\). if \(a_{jg(n+1)}^{d}>F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+\rho (0))w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}})\), then \(\frac{dG_{n}^{br}}{dq_{jgn}}(F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+\rho (0))w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}))=0\), so\(F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}c_{g}})\ge a_{jg1}^d,\ldots ,\ge a_{jgN}^{d}=F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)w_{j}c_{j}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}})\).
- 2.
When \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}<q_{jgn}\), for any \(j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\),\(g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}\), we can get the similar equation \(\frac{dG_{N}^{d}}{dq_{jgN}}=p_{jg}-(1+d)(w_{j}c_{j}+w_{g}c_{g})-p_{jg}F_{jg}(q_{jgN})+w_{g}\gamma _{g}F_{jg}(q_{jgN})\). Let \(\frac{dG_{N}^{d}}{dq_{jgN}}=0\), we get \(q_{jgN}=F_{jg}^{-}(\frac{p_{jg}-(1+d)(w_{j}c_{j}+w_{g}c_{g})}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}})\). The rest proof of the case of \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}<q_{jgn}\) is similar to the case of \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}>q_{jgn}\), it it not disscuss here.
\(\square \)
The proof of Theorem 3
- 1.
If \(\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}}>q_{jgN}\), for any \(j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\),\(g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}\), we can get:
If \((1+d)(R_{N}-\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgN}w_{j}c_{j}+x_{gN}c_{g})^{+}\>0\) then:
If\((1+d)(R_{N}-\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgN}w_{j}c_{j}+x_{gN}c_{g})^{+}\>0\) then:
If \((1+\rho )(\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgN}w_{j}c_{j}+x_{gN}c_{g}-R_{N})^{+}\>0\), then
So we get the following conclusion:
Since \(\pi _{N}(Q_{N},R_{N})\) is a convex function on \(q_{jgN}\). So, when \(R_{N}\ge T_N^{+}1_{(a_{jgN}^{d}<\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}})}\), we get \(Q_{N}^{*}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}argmax_{q_{jgN}\ge 0}\pi _{N}(Q_{N},R_{N})=\sum _{j=1}^{m}{\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}}w_{j}a_{jgN}^{d}\), when \(T_N^{-}1_{(a_{jgN}^{d}<\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}})}< R_{N}\le T_N^{+}1_{(a_{jgN}^{br}<\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}})}\), we get \(Q_{N}^{*}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgN}^{*}\). subject to \(R_{N}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q^{*}_{jgN}w_{j}c_{j}+\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}}w_{g}c_{g}\), thus Theorem 2-case1-(1) hold for \(n=N\).
- 2.
If \(\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}}<q_{jgN}\) for \(\forall g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}, j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\), then
$$\begin{aligned} V_{N+1}(\mathbf {x}_{N+1},\omega _{N+1})= & {} \omega _{N+1}+E\left( \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}\left( \frac{x_{gN+1}}{w_{g}}(w_{g}\gamma _{g}-w_{g}c_{g}) \right. \right. \nonumber \\&-\,(q_{jgN}-D_{jgN})^{+}w_{j}c_{j}))\nonumber \\= & {} H_{N+1}(R_{N+1})+\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}G^{d}_{N+1}(A^{d}_{N+1}), \end{aligned}$$(43)$$\begin{aligned} \pi _{N}(Q_{N},\omega _{N})= & {} \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k} \left( E\left( \frac{x_{gN+1}}{w_{g}}(w_{g}\gamma _{g}-w_{g}c_{g})-(q_{jgN}-D_{jgN})^{+}w_{j}c_{j} \right. \right. \nonumber \\&+\,(p_{jg}-(w_{j}c_{j}+w_{g}c_{g}))Emin(q_{jgN},D_{jgN})\nonumber \\&\left. +\,\varphi \left( \omega _{N}-\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}p_{jg}q_{jgN}\right) \right) \nonumber \\&+\,\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}(w_{j}c_{j}q_{jgN}+(q_{jgN}-x_{gN}c_{g})^{+}+x_{gN}c_{g}) \end{aligned}$$(44)
If \((1+d)(R_{N}-\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgN}w_{j}c_{j}+x_{gN}c_{g})^{+}\>0\), then:
If \((1+\rho )(\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgN}w_{j}c_{j}+x_{gN}c_{g}-R_{N})^{+}\ge 0\), then
When \(R_{N}\ge T^{+}_{N}\), we have \(Q^{*}_{N}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}arg max_{q_{jgN}\ge 0}\pi _{N}(Q_{N},\omega _{N})=T^{+}_{N}\). When \(T^{-}_{N}\le R_{N}\le T^{+}_{N}\), we have \(Q^{*}_{N}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q^{*}_{jgN}\) subject to
Also, when \(R_{N}\ge \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}x_{gN}c_{g}\), we have
If \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}\>q_{jgn}\), for all \(g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}, j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\), first we prove Theorem 2-case1-(2) holds for n, suppose \(R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(q_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\) and \(R_{n}\ge \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}c_{j}q^{d}_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\). Then, \(R_{n}\ge T^{-}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\).
By inductive assumption on Theorem 2-case1-(2) for \(n+1\), we have
When \(R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\), since \(a^{d}_{jgn}\ge a^{d}_{jgn}\), we know \(\pi _{n}(Q_{n}(q_{jgn})),\omega _{n})\) is increasing in \(q_{jgn} j\in [1,m] g\in [m+1,k]\), when \(q_{jgn}\le a^{d}_{jgn}\), and it decreasing in \(q_{jgn} j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}, g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}\), when \(T^{-}_{N}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\le \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q_{jgn}w_{j}c_{j}+x_{gn}c_{g}+x_{gn}c_{g}\le R_{n}\). Now that \(\pi _{n}(Q_{n}(q_{jgn})),\omega _{n})\) is concave in \(q_{jgn}\), thus, \(Q^{*}_{n}(q^{*}_{jgn})=\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}a^{d}_{jgn}+x_{gn}w_{g}\) when \(R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\).
Now suppose \( T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\ge R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\) and we shall prove that
First we prove that \(\pi _{n}(Q_{n}(q_{jgn})),\omega _{n})\) is increasing in \(q_{jgn}\) on \(R_{n}\ge \sum _{j=1}^{m} \sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}c_{j}q^{d}_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\).
Now suppose \(T^{-}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\ge R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\), and we prove that the result is true in this case.
When \(R_{n}\ge \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}c_{j}q_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\), by the inductive assumption onTheorem 2-case1-(2) for \(n+1\), we have
Taking the partial derivative on \(q_{jgn}\) and letting \(R_{n}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}c_{j}q^{1}_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\), to simplify the notation, let \(\omega _{jgn}=w_{j}c_{j}q^{1}_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\), so we obtain
Therefore, when \(T^{-}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\ge R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\) later,the article does not describe the proof process, and as was done there, we can prove \(\frac{\partial \pi _{n}(q^{1}_{jgn})}{\partial q_{jgn}}\ge 0, j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\), \(g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k \}\).
Here, \(\frac{\partial \pi ^{2}_{n}}{\partial q_{jgn}\partial q_{\mu \nu n}}=0 j,\mu \in \{1,\ldots ,m\}, g,\nu \in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}\) and \(j\ne \mu , g\ne \nu \), hessian matrix \(H_{c^{1}_{m}c^{1}_{k-m}c^{1}_{m}c^{1}_{k-m}}<0\), \(\pi _{n}(Q_{n}(q_{jgn})),\omega _{n})\) is incresing in \(q_{jgn}\) on \(\omega _{n}\ge \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k} w_{j}c_{j}q^{d}_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\).
We next prove \(\pi _{n}(\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}q^{1}_{jgn},\omega _{n})=max \pi _{n}(Q_{n}(q_{jgn})),\omega _{n})\) when \(T^{-}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\ge R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}<\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\).
If \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}<q_{jgn}\) for \(\forall g\in [m+1,k] j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\); we also prove Theorem2-case2-(2) holds for n. Suppose \(R_{n}\ge T^{+}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}\>\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\) and \(R_{n}\ge \sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}c_{j}q^{d}_{jgn}+x_{gn}c_{g}\). By the \(R_{n}\ge T^{-}_{n}1_{(a^{d}_{jgn}\>\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\) inductive assumption on Theorem 2-case2-(2)for \(n+1\), we have
The rest proof of condition about \(\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}}<q_{jgn}\), for all \(g \in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}\), \(j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\) is similar to the previous proofs, it is not explained here. \(\square \)
The proof of Proposition 3
We first prove \(Q^{*}_{N}(q^{*}_{jgn})=arg max \pi _{N}(Q^{*}_{N}(q_{jgN}),\omega _{N})\) when \(\bar{K}<\omega _{N}<T^{-}_{n}1_{(a^{br}_{jgn}\>\frac{x_{gn}}{w_{g}})}\).
Now suppose \(\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}w_{j}c_{j}q_{jgN}+(q_{jgN}-\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}})^{+}w_{g}c_{g}+x_{gN}c_{g}\).
Since
If \(\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}}\>q_{jgN}\) for \(\forall g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}, j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\), taking the partial derivative of \(\pi _{N}(Q_{N},\omega _{N})\) on \(q_{jgN}\), we obtain
Since \(\pi _{N}(Q_{N},R_{N})\) is concave in \(q_{jgN}\), it is increasing in \(q_{jgN}\) when \(\frac{\partial \pi _{N}}{\partial q_{jgN}}\ge 0\), or equivalently, when \(F_{jg}(q_{jgN})\le \frac{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}-w{j}c_{j}(1+\rho (\sum _{j=1}^{m}\sum _{g=m+1}^{k}(w_{j}c_{j}q_{jgN}+x_{gN}c_{g})-R_{N})}{p_{jg}-w_{g}\gamma _{g}}\) since
If \(\frac{x_{gN}}{w_{g}}\le q_{jgN}\) for \(\forall g\in \{m+1,\ldots ,k\}, j\in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\),
Since
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bi, G., Song, L. & Fei, Y. Dynamic mixed-item inventory control with limited capital and short-term financing. Ann Oper Res 284, 99–130 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3061-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3061-2