Skip to main content
Log in

The integrated berth allocation, quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: mathematical formulations and a case study

  • S.I.: RealCaseOR
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the integration of three essential seaport terminal operations: the berth allocation problem, the quay crane assignment problem (QCAP), and the quay crane scheduling problem (QCSP). The paper presents a new mathematical formulation that captures all associated operations and constraints. Different quay crane operational policies are considered, namely permitting versus not permitting bay task preemption in QCSP and static versus dynamic crane allocations in QCAP. Thus, variants of the mathematical formulation are introduced to capture the different combinations of these scenarios. Due to the preemption consideration, the models include disaggregated quay crane (QC) tasks. Specifically, QC tasks are identified by single container movements as opposed to bay or stack task allocations that are commonly used in the literature. A case study based on Abu Dhabi’s container terminal is presented where the use of the proposed mathematical models are compared against the current existing operational approach. Results show that the service times can be significantly decreased by the use of the proposed models. Moreover, the policy choice effect on the total schedule is compared through simulated examples and Abu Dhabi’s container terminal case study. The results show that the policy improvements can depend on the problem’s attributes and thus a better policy cannot be generalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou Kasm, O. & Diabat, A. (2019). The quay crane scheduling problem with non-crossing and safety clearance constraints: An exact solution approach. Computers & Operations Research (in press).

  • Abu Dhabi Ports. (2018). Abu Dhabi terminal. Retrieved October 4, 2018, from https://www.adports.ae/gallery_posts/abu-dhabi-terminal/.

  • Agra, A., & Oliveira, M. (2018). MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, N., Trkoullar, Y., Takn, Z. C., & Altnel, K. (2014). Simultaneous optimization of berth allocation, quay crane assignment and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. In Operations Research Proceedings 2012 (pp. 101–107). Springer, Cham.

  • Al-Dhaheri, N., & Diabat, A. (2017). A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the multi-ship quay crane scheduling problem with ship stability constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 248(1–2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwirth, C., & Meisel, F. (2010). A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(3), 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwirth, C., & Meisel, F. (2015). A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 675–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D., Jiang, Z., Yan, W., & He, J. (2010). Integrating berth allocation and quay crane assignments. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 975–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, S., Klabjan, D., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2010). Multiship crane sequencing with yard congestion constraints. Transportation Science, 44(1), 98–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J., Mi, W., Chang, D., & Yan, W. (2009). An investigation into berth allocation and quay crane assignment based on hybrid parallel genetic algorithm. In International Conference on Artificial intelligence and computational intelligence, 2009. AICI’09 (Vol. 2, pp. 48–53). IEEE.

  • Imai, A., Chen, H. C., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2008). The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5), 900–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, G. (2016, February 22). Terminal costs rising and profits harder to find, Drewry says. Retrieved October 4, 2018, from https://www.joc.com/port-news/terminal-costs-rising-and-profits-harder-find-drewry-says_20160222.html.

  • Lee, D. H., & Wang, Q. H. (2010). Integrated discrete berth allocation and quay crane scheduling in port container terminals. Engineering Optimization, 42(8), 747–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C., Huang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2009). A quay crane dynamic scheduling problem by hybrid evolutionary algorithm for berth allocation planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(3), 1021–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z. Q., & Xi, L. F. (2010). A proactive approach for simultaneous berth and quay crane scheduling problem with stochastic arrival and handling time. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1327–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., Han, X., & Xi, L. (2011). Simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem in container terminal. Advanced Science Letters, 4(6–7), 2113–2118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, F., & Bierwirth, C. (2011). A unified approach for the evaluation of quay crane scheduling models and algorithms. Computers & Operations Research, 38(3), 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, F., & Bierwirth, C. (2013). A framework for integrated berth allocation and crane operations planning in seaport container terminals. Transportation Science, 47(2), 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Msakni, M. K., Al-Salem, M., Diabat, A., Rabadi, G., & Kotachi, M. (2016). An integrated quay crane assignment and scheduling problem using branch-and-price. In 2016 International conference on computational science and computational intelligence (CSCI) (pp. 1286–1291). IEEE.

  • Msakni, M. K., Diabat, A., Rabadi, G., Al-Salem, M., & Kotachi, M. (2018). Exact methods for the quay crane scheduling problem when tasks are modeled at the single container level. Computers & Operations Research, 99, 218–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. M., & Kim, K. H. (2005). A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. In Container terminals and automated transport systems (pp. 159–181). Berlin: Springer.

  • Raa, B., Dullaert, W., & Van Schaeren, R. (2011). An enriched model for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14136–14147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Molins, M., Salido, M. A., & Barber, F. (2014). A GRASP-based metaheuristic for the berth allocation problem and the quay crane assignment problem by managing vessel cargo holds. Applied Intelligence, 40(2), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodorou, E., & Diabat, A. (2015). A joint quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: Formulation, solution algorithm and computational results. Optimization Letters, 9(4), 799–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trkoullar, Y. B., Takn, Z. C., Aras, N., & Altnel, K. (2014). Optimal berth allocation and time-invariant quay crane assignment in container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 88–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). Review of maritime transport. Retrieved October 22, 2018, from https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2018_en.pdf.

  • Unsal, O., & Oguz, C. (2013). Constraint programming approach to quay crane scheduling problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 59, 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacca, I., Salani, M., & Bierlaire, M. (2013). An exact algorithm for the integrated planning of berth allocation and quay crane assignment. Transportation Science, 47(2), 148–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Wang, X., & Li, Z. (2012). An optimization approach for coupling problem of berth allocation and quay crane assignment in container terminal. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(1), 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Q., Hu, X., Wang, W., & Fang, Y. (2011). Disruption management model and its algorithms for berth allocation problem in container terminals. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7(5), 2130–2142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first two authors were supported by Abu Dhabi Ports and Maqta Gateway in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. The authors would like to acknowledge their invaluable contributions and extend their warm appreciation to the CEO of Abu Dhabi Ports, Capt. Mohamed Al Shamisi, and the CEO of Maqta Gateway, Dr. Noura Al Dhaheri. Professor Cheng was supported in part by the NSF of China under Grant Number NSF#71390334.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Diabat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abou Kasm, O., Diabat, A. & Cheng, T.C.E. The integrated berth allocation, quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: mathematical formulations and a case study. Ann Oper Res 291, 435–461 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3125-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3125-3

Keywords

Navigation