Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of supplier innovativeness in the humanitarian context

  • S.I.: Design and Management of Humanitarian Supply Chains
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovation in the context of humanitarian supply chain (HSC) is essential to meet the varying needs of beneficiaries around the world. Humanitarian organizations themselves do not possess all the necessary resources for new product innovation. Hence, suppliers working with them play a vital role in helping them deliver innovative products and services to the beneficiaries. This study examines the phenomenon of supplier innovativeness in long-term humanitarian aid delivered by a non-governmental organization (NGO). It employs a single case study approach to investigate the antecedents and drivers of supplier innovativeness in an NGO-led HSC and proposes a novel framework for supplier innovativeness in the HSC context. The findings also underpin beneficiary satisfaction due to supplier innovativeness. Further, the implications of the results show that the new product developed through supplier innovativeness improved social, environmental, and economic dimensions of the beneficiaries. This study also highlights the social and managerial implications of supplier innovativeness and beneficiary satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(adapted from Saldanha et al., 2015)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abushaikha, I., & Schumann-Bölsche, D. (2016). Mobile phones: Established technologies. In Procedia engineering, Humanitarian Technology: Science, Systems and Global Impact 2016, HumTech2016.

  • Altay, N., Heaslip, G., Kovacs, G., Spens, K., Tatham, P., & Vaillancourt, A. (2018). Innovation in humanitarian supply chains: A systematic review. Innovation, 3, 1–24.

  • Arlbjørn, J. S., & Paulraj, A. (2013). Special topic forum on innovation in business networks from a supply chain perspective: Current status and opportunities for future research. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(4), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aune, T. B., & Gressetvold, E. (2011). Supplier involvement in innovation processes: A taxonomy. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(01), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadegan, A., & Dooley, J. (2010). Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6), 488–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, G., Oliveri, F., Braun, M., Seuschek, H., & Hess, E. (2012). Securing disaster supply chains with cryptography enhanced RFID. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 21(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). The resource based view of strategy: Origins, implications, and prospects. Journal of Management, 17(1), 97–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1996). The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization science, 7(5), 469–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J. E., & Feldman, M. P. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36(7), 930–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (2004). Methods for the social sciences. In Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.

  • Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (2000). Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. A. (1982). Selling places: Environmental images for the executive. Regional Studies, 16(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Dresner, M. (2001). Purchasing’s role in environmental management: Cross-functional development of grounded theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S., Emelogu, A., Marufuzzaman, M., Nurre, S. G., & Bian, L. (2017). Drones for disaster response and relief operations: A continuous approximation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Suárez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1998). Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Science, 44(12-part-2), S207–S220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino, A., Rossi, S., & Conforti, A. (2012). Agile and lean principles in the humanitarian supply chain. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. M., Melnyk, S. A., Larson, P. D., Davis, E. W., & Whybark, D. C. (2012). Humanitarian and disaster relief supply chains: A matter of life and death. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmonteil, F.-X., & Rancourt, M. -È. (2017). The role of satellite technologies in relief logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 7(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descubes, I., Timsit, J. P., & Truong, Y. (2013). Social Innovation in emerging economies: A resource-based view perspective. Strategic Change, 22(7–8), 503–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Altay, N., & Blome, C. (2019a). Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Graham, G., Giannakis, M., & Mishra, D. B. (2020). Agility in humanitarian supply chain: An organizational information processing perspective and relational view. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21.

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Papadopoulos, T. (2019b). Disaster relief operations: Past, present and future. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1–2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, É., Laporte, G., Paquette, J., & Rancourt, M. È. (2018). Logistics service network design for humanitarian response in East Africa. Omega, 74, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. (1996). The use of the case study method in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 17(2), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. E., McCarter, M. W., Fawcett, A. M., Webb, G. S., & Magnan, G. M. (2015). Why supply chain collaboration fails: The socio-structural view of resistance to relational strategies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 648–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1969). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D. M., & Autry, C. W. (2012). The role of personal relationships in facilitating supply chain communications: A qualitative study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(1), 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Altay, N., & Luo, Z. (2019). Big data in humanitarian supply chain management: A review and further research directions. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 1153–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavisto, I., & Kovács, G. (2015). A framework for cascading innovation upstream the humanitarian supply chain through procurement processes. Procedia Engineering, 107, 140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadiguna, R. A., Kamil, I., Delati, A., & Reed, R. (2014). Implementing a web-based decision support system for disaster logistics: A case study of an evacuation location assessment for Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 9(1), 3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaslip, G., Kovács, G., & Haavisto, I. (2018a). Cash-based response in relief: The impact for humanitarian logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaslip, G., Kovács, G., & Haavisto, I. (2018b). Innovations in humanitarian supply chains: The case of cash transfer programmes. Production Planning & Control, 29(14), 1175–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschinger, M., Moser, R., Schaefers, T., & Hartmann, E. (2016). No vehicle means no aid—A paradigm change for the humanitarian logistics business model. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(5), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiwasaki, L., Luna, E., & Shaw, R. (2014). Process for integrating local and indigenous knowledge with science for hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in coastal and small island communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial marketing management, 33(5), 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J, Jr., & Slater, S. F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1173–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Davis, D. F. (2008). Grounding supply chain management in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inemek, A., & Matthyssens, P. (2013). The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: An empirical study in cross-border supply networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 580–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahre, M., Ergun, O., & Goentzel, J. (2015). One size fits all? Using standard global tools in humanitarian logistics. Procedia Engineering, 107, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jean, R. J. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Kim, D. (2017). Antecedents and outcomes of supplier innovativeness in international customer–supplier relationships: The role of knowledge distance. Management International Review, 57(1), 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jothi, S., Lakshminarayanan, S., Ramakrishnan, J., & Selvaraj, R. (2016). Beneficiary satisfaction regarding old age pension scheme and its utilization pattern in urban Puducherry: A mixed methods study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 10(9), LC01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, R. R., & Liker, J. K. (1990). Supplier dependence and innovation: A contingency model of suppliers’ innovative activities. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, L., & Denk, N. (2011). How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(4), 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Chai, S. (2017). The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. A., & Tucci, C. L. (2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Science, 48(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Zhao, X., & Huo, B. (2018). Supply chain coordination and innovativeness: A social contagion and learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limbu, M., Wanyagi, L., Ondiek, B., Munsch, B., & Kiilu, K. (2015). Kenya Inter-Agency Rapid Assessment Mechanism (KIRA): A bottom-up humanitarian innovation from Africa. Procedia Engineering, 107, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, D., Tatham, P. H., & Wu, Y. (2017). Internal integration in humanitarian supply chain management: Perspectives at the logistics-programmes interface. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 7(1), 26–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosterman, P. J., Sanabria, D. E., Bilgin, E., Zhang, K., & Zander, J. (2014). Automating humanitarian missions with a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles. Annual Reviews in Control, 38(2), 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassimbeni, G. (2003). Local manufacturing systems and global economy: Are they compatible?: The case of the Italian eyewear district. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, K. V., & Swaminatha, J. M. (2017). Multi-treatment inventory allocation in humanitarian health settings under funding constraints. Production and Operations Management, 26(6), 1015–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozguven, E. E., & Ozbay, K. (2015). An RFID-based inventory management framework for emergency relief operations. Transportation Research Part C, 57(1), 166–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna, S. R., & Haavisto, I. (2018). Collaboration in humanitarian supply chains: An organisational culture framework. International Journal of Production Research, 56(17), 5611–5625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragavendran, P. S. (2015). Management ingredients to embrace the new paradigm: Green. European Business Review, 27(3), 318–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalingam, B., Jones, H., Reba, T., & Young, J. (2008). Exploring the science of complexity: Ideas and implications for development and humanitarian efforts. (Vol. 285). Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rungtusanatham, M., Salvador, F., Forza, C., & Choi, T. Y. (2003). Supply-chain linkages and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(9), 1084–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldanha, J. P., Mello, J. E., Knemeyer, A. M., & Vijayaraghavan, T. A. S. (2015). Implementing supply chain technologies in emerging markets: An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, S. E., & Froehle, C. M. (2006). Foundations and implications of a proposed unified services theory. Production and Operations Management, 15(2), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, S. E., & Spring, M. (2012). Customer roles in service supply chains and opportunities for innovation. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(4), 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H. (2012). Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer. Research-Technology Management, 55(1), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H., Veldman, J., & Hüttinger, L. (2011). Supplier innovativeness and supplier pricing: The role of preferred customer status. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(01), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffling, S., Hannibal, C., Tickle, M., & Fan, Y. (2020). The implications of complexity for humanitarian logistics: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 1–32.

  • Schniederjans, D. G., Ozpolat, K., & Chen, Y. (2016). Humanitarian supply chain use of cloud computing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(5), 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S. (2011). Supply chain management for sustainable products—insights from research applying mixed methodologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(7), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. M., Siguaw, J. A., & White, S. C. (2002). Measuring the performance of suppliers: An analysis of evaluation processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(4), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., & Brush, T. (2006). Supplier performance in vertical alliances: The effects of self-enforcing agreements and enforceable contracts. Organization Science, 17(4), 436–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatham, P., Neal, C., & Wu, Y. (2017). Hybrid cargo airships: A humanitarian logistic game changer?. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 7(2), 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatham, P., Stadler, F., Murray, A., & Shaban, R. Z. (2017). Flying maggots: A smart logistic solution to an enduring medical challenge. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 7, 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavani, S. N., Sharifi, H., & Ismail, H. S. (2014). A study of contingency relationships between supplier involvement, absorptive capacity and agile product innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(1), 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Procurement. (2019). https://www.un.org/Depts/ptd/about-us/procurement-manual; Accessed on 22 September 2020.

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2019). Sustainable innovation: Pushing the boundaries of traditional operations management. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2930–2945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., Deakins, E., Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. (2019). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 1517–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waidyanatha, N., Perera, K., Silva, M., Burrell, B., & Sigauke, T. (2013). Useful and easy-to-use interactive voice for emergency data exchange. Info, 15(5), 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby, R. L., & Keenan, R. (2012). Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3), 348–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynstra, F., Von Corswant, F., & Wetzels, M. (2010). In chains? An empirical study of antecedents of supplier product development activity in the automotive industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 625–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods, applied social research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative Research Methods, 5, 359–386.

  • Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Supply Chain Management and Decision Sciences, EM Normandie Business School, Métis Lab, Le Havre, France

    Sabari R. Prasanna

Authors
  1. Sabari R. Prasanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabari R. Prasanna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasanna, S.R. The role of supplier innovativeness in the humanitarian context. Ann Oper Res 319, 1359–1377 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04065-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04065-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation