Abstract
Governments in developing countries tend to assess the contracting mechanisms in the agricultural sector to maximize farmer welfare. We analyze the impacts of certain contract structures (wholesale price and revenue sharing) in the setting where the upstream pricing is regulated for farmer welfare. We develop an analytical model in which farmers sell inputs to firms competing in the downstream market. Our model embraces such features as (i) Cournot competition, (ii) regulated pricing of inputs, and (iii) total welfare maximization. We first characterize the market output and input pricing decisions. We then compare the pricing and players’ payoffs in our setting with those in the setting where the upstream pricing is deregulated. We ascertain the impacts of the degree of market competition on players’ payoffs and contracting decisions. We find farmer’s payoff is higher if it strategically decides the input price. Interestingly, under the revenue sharing contract, the value of strategic pricing to the farmer decreases with an increase in market competition. However, under the wholesale contract, the value of strategic pricing to the farmer may increase or decrease in the market competition. In addition, we analyze the setting where the farmers are located in distinct geographies with different pricing regulations and derive interesting findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal, V. (2018). India, buried in sugar, tries to dig out. The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-buried-in-sugar-tries-to-dig-out-1527591604 (last accessed on 25 March 25 2019).
Alwan, L. C., Yang, C., & Fang, W. (2022). An advanced buyback contract and information asymmetry. Annals of Operations Research, (forthcoming).
Arya, A., Mittendorf, B., & Sappington, D. E. (2008). Outsourcing, vertical integration, and price versus quantity competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(1), 1–16.
An, J., Cho, S. H., & Tang, C. S. (2015). Aggregating smallholder farmers in emerging economies. Production and Operations Management, 24(9), 1414–1429.
Basu, A., Jain, T., & Hazra, J. (2018). Supplier selection under production learning and process improvements. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 411–420.
Becker-Peth, M., & Thonemann, U. W. (2016). Reference points in revenue sharing contracts-How to design optimal supply chain contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 1033–1049.
Bose, K. (2016) Revenue-sharing formula can redeem sugar sector. Business Standard, https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/revenue-sharing-formula-can-redeem-sugar-sector-116052400045_1.html (last accessed on March 23, 2019).
Boyabatli, O., Nasiry, J., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Crop planning in sustainable agriculture: Dynamic farmland allocation in the presence of crop rotation benefits. Management Science, 65(5), 2060–2076.
Business Standard (2015) EID Parry expands product portfolio in value added sugar. Business Standard, https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/eid-parry-expands-product-portfolio-in-value-added-sugar-115091400978_1.html (last accessed on March 23, 2020).
BusinessLine (2018) TN to adopt revenue sharing model for payments to cane farmers. The Hindu BusinessLine, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/tn-to-adopt-revenue-sharing-model-for-payments-to-cane-farmers/article23263388.ece (last accessed on March 23, 2019).
Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 11, 227–339.
Chand, R., Srivastava, S.K., & Singh, J. (2017) Changing structure of rural economy of India: Implications for employment and growth. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog Discussion Paper, Government of India.
Chen, Y., Chung, S. H., & Guo, S. (2020). Franchising contracts in fashion supply chain operations: models, practices, and real case study. Annals of Operations Research, 291, 83–128.
Chen, Y. J., & Tang, C. S. (2015). The economic value of market information for farmers in developing economies. Production and Operations Management, 24(9), 1441–1452.
Chernonog, T. (2021). Strategic information sharing in online retailing under a consignment contract with revenue sharing. Annals of Operations Research, 300(2), 621–641.
Docherty, C. (2012) Branding agricultural commodities: The development case for adding value through branding. IIED Report, https://pubs.iied.org/16509IIED/ (last accessed on April 14, 2020).
EXIM Bank of India. (2012) Technological interventions in Indian agriculture for enhancement of crop productivity. EXIM Bank of India Official Website. http://www.eximbankindia.in/sites/default/files/Full%20OP/op155.pdf (last accessed on March 25, 2018).
Florentino, H. D. O., Jones, D. F., Irawan, C. A., Ouelhadj, D., Khosravi, B., & Cantane, D. R. (2022). An optimization model for combined selecting, planting and harvesting sugarcane varieties. Annals of Operations Research, (forthcoming).
Glen, J. J. (1987). Mathematical models in farm planning: A survey. Operations Research, 35(5), 641–666.
Goic, M., Jerath, K., & Srinivasan, K. (2011). Cross-market discounts. Marketing Science, 30(1), 134–148.
Huh, W. T., Athanassoglou, S., & Lall, U. (2012). Contract farming with possible reneging in a developing country: Can it work? IIMB Management Review, 24(4), 187–202.
Jain, T., & Hazra, J. (2019). Vendor’s strategic investments under IT outsourcing competition. Service Science, 11(1), 16–39.
Jain, T., Hazra, J., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2020). Bidding for outsourcing contracts with capacity investments and cost asymmetry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(12), 1986–2012.
Jain, T., Hazra, J., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2021). IT outsourcing and vendor cost improvement strategies under asymmetric information. Decision Sciences, 52(5), 1109–1136.
KPMG (2017) The Indian sugar industry sector roadmap 2017. KPMG Report, http://www.in.kpmg.com/pdf/indian_sugar_industry.pdf (accessed on 23rd March 2020).
Lowe, T. J., & Preckel, P. V. (2004). Decision technologies for agribusiness problems: A brief review of selected literature and a call for research. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 6(3), 201–208.
Lu, M., Sethi, S., Xie, Y., & Yan, H. (2019). Profit allocation, decision sequence and compliance aspects of coordinating contracts: A retrospect. Production and Operations Management, 28(5), 1222–1237.
OECD (2009) Agricultural policies in emerging economies: Monitoring and evaluation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Report, https://www.oecd.org/countries/ukraine/42347206.pdf (last accessed on March 23, 2019).
Perlman, Y., Ozinci, Y., & Westrich, S. (2022). Pricing decisions in a dual supply chain of organic and conventional agricultural products. Annals of Operations Research, (forthcoming).
PIB (2018) Cabinet approves determination of fair and remunerative price payable by sugar mills for 2018-19 sugar season: A farmer friendly step. Press Information Bureau (PIB), India. http://pib.nic.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1539077 (last accessed on March 23, 2019).
PTI (2017) Adopt revenue sharing formula for payments to farmers: CACP. Press Trust of India (PTI) Coverage on The Times of India, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/adopt-revenue-sharing-formula-for-payments-to-farmers-cacp/articleshow/62069766.cms (last accessed on March 23, 2019).
Qin, J., Wang, K., Wang, Z., & Xia, L. (2020). Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition. Annals of Operations Research, 291, 731–760.
Radulescu, M., Radulescu, C. Z., & Zbaganu, G. (2014). A portfolio theory approach to crop planning under environmental constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 219(1), 243–264.
Ranjan, A. (2017) Let farmers set the price. The Economic Times Blogs, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/et-commentary/let-farmers-set-the-price/ (last accessed on September 09, 2020).
Sawhney, T. (2019) The current sugarcane pricing policy & its critical analysis. Indian Sugar Mills Association (ISMA), http://www.indiansugar.com/PDFS/Current_sugarcane_pricing_policy__0405-Tarun_Sawhney.pdf (last accessed on March 25, 2019).
Shukla, S.K., Zubair, A., Awasthi, S.K., & Pathak, A.D. (2018) Sugarcane varieties identified by AICRP (S) in India. ICAR Report. http://www.iisr.nic.in/aicrp/download/FinalBookSugarcaneVarieties.pdf (last accessed on March 25, 2020).
Spanaki, K., Sivarajah, U., Fakhimi, M., Despoudi, S., & Irani, Z. (2022). Disruptive technologies in agricultural operations: a systematic review of AI-driven AgriTech research. Annals of Operations Research, 308, 491–524.
Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15, 546–554.
Tan, B., & Comden, N. (2012). Agricultural planning of annual plants under demand, maturation, harvest, and yield risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 539–549.
Tang, C. S., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2015). The implications of utilizing market information and adopting agricultural advice for farmers in developing economies. Production and Operations Management, 24(8), 1197–1215.
Trade Promotion Council of India (2018) Is it really possible to replicate sugar output success in pulses and oilseeds? Trade Promotion Council of India Official Website. https://ibt.tpci.in/blogs/is-it-really-possible-to-replicate-sugar-output-success-in-pulses-and-oilseeds/ (last accessed on March 25, 2018).
Triveni (2020) Products section. Triveni Engineering & Industries Official Website, https://www.trivenishagun.com/index.php (last accessed on April 14, 2020).
USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2014) Grain and Feed Annual Report on India. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Grain%20and%20Feed%20Annual_%20New%20Delhi_India_2-14-2014.pdf (last accessed on March 25, 2018).
Venkataraman, S. V., & Asfaw, D. (2020). Buyback contract under asymmetric information about retailer’s loss aversion nature. Annals of Operations Research, 295(1), 385–409.
Wang, J., & Shin, H. (2015). The impact of contracts and competition on upstream innovation in a supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 24(1), 134–146.
Wangchuk, R. N. (2020). Here’s how experts believe we can make India’s farmers worry-free. The Better India. https://www.thebetterindia.com/229213/india-organic-agriculture-earning-farmers-insurance-irrigation-reforms-future-prices-nor41/ (last accessed on August 25, 2020).
World Bank (2022). World Development Indicators 2022. World Bank Database, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (last accessed on June 06, 2022).
Yu, Y., He, Y., Zhao, X., & Zhou, L. (2022). Certify or not? An analysis of organic food supply chain with competing suppliers. Annals of Operations Research, (forthcoming).
Zhang, Y., Donohue, K., & Cui, T. H. (2015). Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback versus revenue sharing. Management Science, 62(6), 1734–1754.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Editor and anonymous referees for their many helpful comments on earlier versions of our paper. Hazra was supported in part by Indian Institute of Management Bangalore under IIMB Chair of Excellence. Cheng was supported in part by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University under the Fung Yiu King - Wing Hang Bank Endowed Professorship in Business Administration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jain, T., Hazra, J. & Cheng, T.C.E. Analysis of upstream pricing regulation and contract structure in an agriculture supply chain. Ann Oper Res 320, 85–122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04902-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04902-1