Skip to main content
Log in

De Vries Algebras and Compact Regular Frames

  • Published:
Applied Categorical Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the de Vries theorem, the category DeV of de Vries algebras is dually equivalent to the category KHaus of compact Hausdorff spaces. By the Isbell theorem, the category KRFrm of compact regular frames is dually equivalent to KHaus. The proofs of both theorems employ the axiom of choice. It is a consequence of the de Vries and Isbell theorems that DeV is equivalent to KRFrm. We give a direct proof of this result, which is choice-free. In the absence of the axiom of countable dependent choice (CDC), the category KCRFrm of compact completely regular frames is a proper subcategory of KRFrm. We introduce the category cDeV of completely regular de Vries algebras, which in the absence of (CDC) is a proper subcategory of DeV, and show that cDeV is equivalent to KCRFrm. Finally, we show how the restriction of the equivalence of DeV and KRFrm works in the zero-dimensional and extremally disconnected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banaschewski, B.: Compactification of frames. Math. Nachr. 149, 105–115 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Banaschewski, B., Mulvey, C.J.: Stone-Čech compactification of locales. I. Houst. J. Math. 6(3), 301–312 (1980)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Banaschewski, B., Pultr, A.: Booleanization. Cah. Topol. Géom. Différ. Catég. 37(1), 41–60 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bezhanishvili, G.: Stone duality and Gleason covers through de Vries duality. Topol. Its Appl. 157(6), 1064–1080 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. de Vries, H.: Compact Spaces and Compactifications. An Algebraic Approach. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (1962)

  6. Gleason, A.M.: Projective topological spaces. Ill. J. Math. 2, 482–489 (1958)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Isbell, J.R.: Atomless parts of spaces. Math. Scand. 31, 5–32 (1972)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnstone, P.T.: Stone Spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Smirnov, Y.M.: On proximity spaces. Mat. Sb. N.S. 31(73), 543–574 (1952). Russian

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stone, M.H.: The theory of representations for Boolean algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 40(1), 37–111 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, M.H.: Algebraic characterizations of special Boolean rings. Fundam. Math. 29, 223–302 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guram Bezhanishvili.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bezhanishvili, G. De Vries Algebras and Compact Regular Frames. Appl Categor Struct 20, 569–582 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-011-9252-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-011-9252-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2010)

Navigation