Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study of stochastic optimization methods in electric motor design

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of universal electric motors that are widely used in home appliances can be improved by optimizing the geometry of the rotor and the stator. Expert designers traditionally approach this task by iteratively evaluating candidate designs and improving them according to their experience. However, the existence of reliable numerical simulators and powerful stochastic optimization techniques make it possible to automate the design procedure. We present a comparative study of six stochastic optimization algorithms in designing optimal rotor and stator geometries of a universal electric motor where the primary objective is to minimize the motor power losses. We compare three methods from the domain of evolutionary computation, generational evolutionary algorithm, steady-state evolutionary algorithm and differential evolution, two particle-based methods, particle-swarm optimization and electromagnetism-like algorithm, and a recently proposed multilevel ant stigmergy algorithm. By comparing their performance, the most efficient method for solving the problem is identified and an explanation of its success is offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ANSYS User’s Manual (2000) ANSYS version 5.6. ANSYS Inc. Canonsburg, PA

  2. Birbil SI, Fang SC (2003) An electromagnetism-like mechanism for global optimization. J Global Optim 25(3):263–282

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy (in Italian)

  4. Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) The ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, and Cybern–Part B 26(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorigo M, Di Caro G, Gambardella LM (1999) Ant algorithms for discrete optimization. Artif Life 5(2):137–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eberhart RC, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium micro machine and human science, Nagoya, Japan, pp 39–43

  7. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference neural networks. Perth, Australia, pp 1942–1948

  10. Korošec P, Šilc J (2005) The multilevel ant stigmergy algorithm: An industrial case study. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computational intelligence and natural computing. Salt Lake City, UT, pp 475–478

  11. Korošec P, Papa G, Šilc J (2005) Optimization algorithms inspired by electromagnetism and stigmergy in electro-technical engineering. WSEAS Trans Inf Sci Appl 5(2):587–591

    Google Scholar 

  12. Papa G, Koroušić-Seljak B, Benedičič B, Kmecl T (2003) Universal motor efficiency improvement using evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 50(3):602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Price KV, Storn R (1997) Differential evolution—a simple evolution strategy for fast optimization. Dr. Dobb’s J 22(4):18–24

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price KV, Storn R, Lampinen JA (2005) Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization. Springer-Verlag, Secaucus, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Puternicki P, Rudnicki M (1999) Optimal design methodologies with application to small commutator motors. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on electromagnetic fields in electrical engineering, Pavia, Italy, pp 397–400

  16. Robič T, Filipič B (2004) In search for an efficient parameter tuning method for steel casting. In: Proceedings of the international conference on bioinspired optimization methods and their applications. Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp 83–94

  17. Sen PC (1996) Principles of electric machines and power electronics. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shaked NT (2004) Optimization of switched reluctance motors using genetic algorithms. M.Sc. Thesis, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

  19. Shi Y, Eberhart RC (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference evolutionary computation. Anchorage, AK, pp 69–73

  20. Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Tea Tušar & Bogdan Filipič

  2. Department of Computer Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Peter Korošec, Gregor Papa & Jurij Šilc

Authors
  1. Tea Tušar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Korošec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregor Papa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bogdan Filipič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jurij Šilc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bogdan Filipič.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tušar, T., Korošec, P., Papa, G. et al. A comparative study of stochastic optimization methods in electric motor design. Appl Intell 27, 101–111 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-006-0022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-006-0022-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation