Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid diagnostic-advisory system for small and medium-sized enterprises: A successful AI application

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a hybrid expert diagnosis-advisory system developed for small and medium enterprises. The Performance, Development, Growth (PDG) system is completely implemented and fully operational, and has been successfully used on real-world data from SMEs for several years. Although our system contains a great deal of the domain knowledge and expertise that is a hallmark of AI systems, it was not designed using the symbolic techniques traditionally used to implement such systems. We explain why this is so and discuss how the PDG system relates to expert systems, decision support systems, and general applications in AI. We also present an experimental evaluation of the system and identify developments currently under way and our plans for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Cassell and S. Nadinand M. Older Gray, “The use and effectiveness of benchmarking in SMEs,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 212–222, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.M. Yasin, “The theory and practice of benchmarking: Then and now,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 217–243, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Turban and J.E. Aronson, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Prentice Hall, 2001.

  4. C.W. Holsapple and A.B. Whinston, Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-Based Approach. West, 1996.

  5. J.P. Shim, M. Warkentin, J.F. Courtney, D.J. Power and R. Sharda and C. Carlsson, “Past, present, and future of decision support technology,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 33, pp. 111–126, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Operational Research Society, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference, 2001. http://www.orsoc.org.uk/conf/previous/or43/Abstracts%20Handbook.doc.

  7. School of Business, University of Maine, BUA 335, 2003. http://www.mbs.maine.edu/gibson_ginny/bua335/syllabus.htm

  8. Keller Graduate School of Management, DeVry University, IS535, 2003. members.aol.com/is535/ overview.htm

  9. G. Forgionne and R. Kohliand D. Jennings, “An AHP analysis of quality in AI and DSS journals, omega,” International Journal of Management Science, vol. 30, pp. 171–183, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Plenert, “Improved decision support systems help to build better artificial intelligence systems,” Kybernetes Vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 48–54, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Chen and S. Lin, “An interactive neural network-based approach for solving multiple criteria decision-making problems,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.S. Sexton and R.E. Dorsey, “Reliable classification using neural networks: A genetic algorithm and backpropagation comparison,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y.W. Leung J.-Y. Mao, “Providing embedded proactive task support for diagnostic jobs: A neural network-based approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 255–267, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Leigh and R. Purvisand J.M. Ragusa, “Forecasting the NYSE composite index with technical analysis, pattern recognizer, neural network, and genetic algorithm: A case study in romantic decision support,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 361–377, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.L. Wong, “A flexible knowledge discovery system using genetic programming and logic grammars,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 405–428, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Houben and K. Lenieand K. Vanhoof, “A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 125–135, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Rosca and C. Wild, “Towards a flexible deployment of business rules,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 23, pp. 385–394, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Sloane, “An analysis of the medical decision support, expert system, and artificial intelligence literature,” 33rd Proceedings of the Decision Science Institute, San Diego, 2002.

  19. S. Eom, “The intellectual development and structure of decision support systems (1991–1995),” Omega, International Journal of Management Science, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 639–656, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Eom, “Decision support systems research: current state and trends,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 213–220, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Dattakumar and R. Jagadeesh, “A review of literature on benchmarking,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 176–209, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Muhlemann and D. Priceand M. Afferson, “A computer based approach for enhancing manufacturing decision making in smaller manufacturing enterprises: A longitudinal study,” Omega, International Journal of Management Science, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Price, R. Beach, A. Muhlemann and J. Sharpand A. Paterson, “A system to support the enhancement of strategic flexibility in manufacturing enterprises,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 109, pp. 362–376, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Levy and P. Powell, “Information systems strategy for small and medium sized enterprises: An organisational perspective,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–84, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Levy and P. Powelland R. Galliers, “Assessing information systems strategy development frameworks in SMEs,” Information & Management, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 247–261, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. St-Pierre, L. Raymond and E. Andriambeloson, “Performance effects of the adoption of benchmarking and best practices in manufacturing SMEs,” in Proceedings of the Small Business and Enterprise Development Conference, Nottingham, U.K., 2002.

  27. J. St-Pierre and S. Delisle, “An expert diagnosis system for the benchmarking of SMEs' performance,” Benchmarking—An International Journal, Emerald, vol. 13, nos. 4–6, to appear.

  28. D. Longbottom “Benchmarking in the U.K.: An empirical study of practitioners and academics,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 98–117, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J.-L. Maire, “A model of characterization of the performance for a process of benchmarking,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 506–520, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Delisle and J. St-Pierre “An rxpert diagnosis system for the benchmarking of SMEs' performance,” 1st Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance Measures, Benchmarking and Best Practices in the New Economy (Business Excellence 03), Guimaraes, Portugal, vol. 191–196, 2003.

  31. E. Monkhouse “The role of competitive benchmarking in small- to medium-sized enterprises,” Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology 2, no. 4, pp. 41–50, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Ghobadian and D.N. Gallear, “Total quality management in SMEs,” Omega, International Journal of Management Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 83–106, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Stefansson “Business-to-business data sharing: A source for integration of supply Chains,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 75, no. 1–2, pp. 135–146, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Bellone and M. Merlinoand R. Pesenti, “ISPM: a DSS for personnel career management,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 219–227, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Tsubone and H. Matsuuraand K. Kimura, “Decision support system for production planning—concept and prototype,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M.Z. Zgurowsky, I.I. Kovalenko and K. Kondrakand E. Kondrak, “Expert systems in project management,” Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 81–87, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumposand N.F. Matsatsinis, “On the use of knowledge-based decision support systems in financial management: A survey,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 259–277, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M.S. Fridson Financial statement analysis: A practitionner's guide, second edition, Wiley, 1996.

  39. B. Denkena and R. Apitzand C. Liedtke, “Knowledge-based benchmarking of production performance,” Proc. of the First International Conf. on Performance Measures, Benchmarking and Best Practices in the New Economy (Business Excellence '03), Guimaraes (Portugal), 10–13, June 2003 pp. 166– 171.

  40. J. Santos and Z. Valeand C. Ramos, “On the verification of an expert system: Practical issues,” Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence #2358, pp. 414–424, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. G. Schreiber, H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog and N. ShadboltW. Van de velde, and B. Wielinga, Knowledge engineering and management: The common KADS Methodology, MIT Press, 2002.

  42. N.F. Matsatsinis and M. Doumposand C. Zopounidis, “Knowledge acquisition and representation for expert systems in the field of financial analysis,” Experts Systems with Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 247–262, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Nedovic and V. Devedzic, “Expert systems in finance—A cross-section of the field,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 23, pp. 49–66, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. W.P. Wagner and J. Ottoand Q.B. Chung, “Knowledge acquisition for expert systems in accounting and financial problem solving,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 15, pp. 439–447, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. J. St-Pierre, L. Raymond and E. Andriambeloson, “Performance effects of the adoption of benchmarking and best practices in manufacturing SMEs,” Proc. of the Conf. on Small Business and Enterprise Development, The University of Nottingham (UK), pp. 15–16 April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Stamelos and I. Refanidis, “Decision making based on past problem cases,” Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence #2308, pp. 42–53, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Delisle and J. St-Pierre “Expertise in a hybrid diagnostic-recommendation system for SMEs: A successful real-life application,” The 17th International Conference on Industrial & Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems (IEA/AIE 2004), Ottawa (Canada), May 17–20 2004, pp. 807–816. In B. Orchard, C. Yang, and M. Alis (Eds.): Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3029, Springer-Verlag.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Delisle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delisle, S., St-Pierre, J. & Copeck, T. A hybrid diagnostic-advisory system for small and medium-sized enterprises: A successful AI application. Appl Intell 24, 127–141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-006-6934-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-006-6934-z

Keywords

Navigation