Abstract
We describe statistical methods for managing healthcare costs using peer-group models and outlier detection. A peer group is a collection of similar entities such as patients, physicians, clinics, hospitals or pharmacies. In an empirical study of drug volumes prescribed by physicians, we examined the billing and prescription records for all patients covered by a major insurer over a 6 month period, encompassing over twenty million individual patient-physician encounters. During this period, 21,243 physicians prescribed a major pain-control medication which is frequently the subject of abuse - oxycodone. Profiles were computed for each physician based on their specialty and the clinical characteristics of their patients. For each physician, the average prescription volume within the corresponding peer group of similar physicians is an estimate of the expected volume of prescriptions for that physician. Strategies were developed to select outliers from the expected values as the ones that are candidates for potential cost reduction. Overall, the prediction of actual outcomes from peer profiles is significantly better than chance, with a reduction of average error of 45.5 %. For the 10 % of physicians that prescribed the most medications, there were extreme and highly significant differences found between their expected and predicted outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggarwal C (2013) Outlier analysis. Springer, New York
Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 95:1082–1095
Bolton RJ, Hand DJ et al (2001) Unsupervised profiling methods for fraud detection. In: Proc. credit scoring and credit control VII. Citeseer
Carlson J, Sullivan S, Garrison L, Neumann P, Veenstra D (2010) Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy 96:179–190
Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2009) Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 41 (3):15:1–15:58
Leap T (2011) Phantom billing, fake prescriptions, and the high cost of medicine. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Li J, Huang K, Jin J, Shi J (2008) A survey on statistical methods for health care fraud detection. Health Care Manag Sci 11:275–287
Phua C, Lee V, Smith K, Gayler R (2010) A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research. arXiv preprint arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.6119
Porter M (2009) A strategy for health care reform toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 361:109–112
Porter M, Teisberg E (2006) Redefining healthcare creating value based competition on results. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge
Schultz P, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429–434
Sparrow M (2008) Fraud in the us health-care system: exposing the vulnerabilities of automated payments systems. Soc Res: An International Quarterly 75:1151–1180
United States G. A. O. (2000) HealthCare fraud schemes to defraud, Medicare, Medicaid and Private Health Insurers. GAO/T-OSI-00-15, Washington, DC
van Walraven C, Naylor C (1998) Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. JAMA 280(6):550–558
Weiss S, Indurkhya N (1998) Predictive data mining: a practical guide. Morgan Kaufmann. http://www.data-miner.com
Weston DJ, Hand DJ, Adams NM, Whitrow C, Juszczak P (2008) Plastic card fraud detection using peer group analysis. Adv Data Anal Classif 2(1):45–62
World-Health-Organization (2014) International classification of diseases. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, S.M., Kulikowski, C.A., Galen, R.S. et al. Managing healthcare costs by peer-group modeling. Appl Intell 43, 752–759 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-015-0685-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-015-0685-7