Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Activity recognition and intensity estimation in youth from accelerometer data aided by machine learning

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical activity monitoring for youth is an area of increasing scientific and public health interest due to the high prevalence of obesity and downward trend in physical activity. However, accurate assessment of such activity remains a challenging problem because of the complex nature in which certain activities are performed. In this study, we formulated the issue as a machine learning problem—using a diverse set of 19 physical activities commonly performed by youth—via two approaches: activity recognition and intensity estimation. With the aid of training data, we implemented a distance metric learning method called DML-KNN that utilizes time-frequency features and is capable of effectively classifying both continuous and intermittent movement in youth subjects. Four different time-frequency feature extraction methods were then systematically evaluated. Our results show that the DML-KNN method performed competitively, especially when using features extracted by the Tamura method for intensity estimation, and by the Square Coefficient method for activity recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen FR, Ambikairajah E, Lovell NH, Celler BG (2006) Classification of a known sequence of motions and postures from accelerometry data using adapted gaussian mixture models. Physiol Meas 27(10):935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aminian K, Najafi B (2004) Capturing human motion using body-fixed sensors: outdoor measurement and clinical applications. Comput Anim Virtual Worlds 15(2):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Awais M, Mellone S, Chiari L (2015) Physical activity classification meets daily life: review on existing methodologies and open challenges. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 5050–5053

  4. Bao L, Intille SS (2004) Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: Pervasive computing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–17

  5. Cleland I, Kikhia B, Nugent C, Boytsov A, Hallberg J, Synnes K, McClean S, Finlay D (2013) Optimal placement of accelerometers for the detection of everyday activities. Sensors 13(7):9183–9200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crouter SE, Clowers KG, Bassett DR (2006) A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 100(4):1324–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crouter SE, Horton M, Bassett DR Jr (2012) Use of a 2-regression model for estimating energy expenditure in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(6):1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalton A, OLaighin G (2013) Comparing supervised learning techniques on the task of physical activity recognition. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 17(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis K, Kerr J, Godbole S, Lanckriet G, Wing D, Marshall S (2014) A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers. Physiol Meas 35(11):2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ermes M, Parkka J, Mantyjarvi J, Korhonen I (2008) Detection of daily activities and sports with wearable sensors in controlled and uncontrolled conditions. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedson PS, Lyden K, Kozey-Keadle S, Staudenmayer J (2011) Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting mets and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample. J Appl Physiol 111(6):1804–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong YJ, Kim IJ, Ahn SC, Kim HG (2010) Mobile health monitoring system based on activity recognition using accelerometer. Simul Model Pract Theory 18(4):446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan AM, Lee YK, Lee SY, Kim TS (2010) A triaxial accelerometer-based physical-activity recognition via augmented-signal features and a hierarchical recognizer. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14(5):1166–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lovell N, Wang N, Ambikairajah E, Celler BG (2007) Accelerometry based classification of walking patterns using time-frequency analysis. In: 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. IEEE, pp 899–4902

  15. Mannini A, Intille SS, Rosenberger M, Sabatini AM, Haskell W (2013) Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45(11):2193–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathie M, Celler BG, Lovell NH, Coster A (2004) Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Biol Eng Comput 42(5):679–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mu Y, Ding W, Tao D (2013) Local discriminative distance metrics ensemble learning. Pattern Recogn 46(8):2337– 2349

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mu Y, Lo HZ, Ding W, Tao D (2014) Face Recognition from Multiple Images per subject. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, pp 889–892

  19. Mu Y, Lo HZ, Ding W, Amaral K, Crouter SE (2014) Bipart: learning block structure for activity detection. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(10):2397–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Najafi B, Aminian K, Loew F, Blanc Y, Robert P et al (2002) Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49(8):843–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen TT, Liew AWC, Tran MT, Nguyen MP (2014) Combining multi classifiers based on a genetic algorithm–a gaussian mixture model framework. In: Intelligent Computing Methodologies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 56–67

  22. Nyan M, Tay F, Seah K, Sitoh Y (2006) Classification of gait patterns in the time–frequency domain. J Biomech 39(14):2647–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pärkkä J, Ermes M, Korpipää P, Mäntyjärvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I (2006) Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10(1):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parkka J, Ermes M, Antila K, van Gils M, Manttari A, Nieminen H (2007) Estimating intensity of physical activity: a comparison of wearable accelerometer and gyro sensors and 3 sensor locations. In: 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. IEEE, pp 1511–1514

  25. Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, Freedson PS et al (2006) Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38 (9):1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LP, Howard D (2009) A comparison of feature extraction methods for the classification of dynamic activities from accelerometer data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(3):871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LP, Howard D, Meijer K, Crompton R (2009) Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques. Physiol Meas 30(4):R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reiss A, Stricker D (2011) Introducing a modular activity monitoring system. In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBC. IEEE, pp 5621–5624

  29. Sekine M, Tamura T, Togawa T, Fukui Y (2000) Classification of waist-acceleration signals in a continuous walking record. Med Eng Phys 22(4):285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sekine M, Tamura T, Akay M, Fujimoto T, Togawa T, Fukui Y (2002) Discrimination of walking patterns using wavelet-based fractal analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 10(3):188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Skotte J, Korshøj M, Kristiansen J, Hanisch C, Holtermann A (2014) Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers. J Phys Act Health 11(1):76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, Bassett D, Freedson P (2009) An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 107(4):1300–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY (2014) Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med 48(13):1019–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Trost SG, Wong WK, Pfeiffer KA, Zheng Y (2012) Artificial neural networks to predict activity type and energy expenditure in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(9):1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trost SG, Zheng Y, Wong WK (2014) Machine learning for activity recognition: hip versus wrist data. Physiol Meas 35(11): 2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Veltink PH, Bussmann HB, De Vries W, Martens WL, Van Lummel RC (1996) Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4(4):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yi C, Jeong S, Han KS, Lee H (2013) Age-group classification for family members using multi-layered bayesian classifier with gaussian mixture model. In: Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1153–1159

  38. Zhou Y, Cheng Z, Jing L, Hasegawa T (2015) Towards unobtrusive detection and realistic attribute analysis of daily activity sequences using a finger-worn device. Appl Intell 43(2): 386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zijlstra W, Aminian K (2007) Mobility assessment in older people: new possibilities and challenges. Eur J Ageing 4(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from National Institutes of Health (R21HL093407) to develop novel approaches to monitor physical activity in children.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wuhan University International School of Software, 37 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

    Xiang Ren & Rong Xie

  2. Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA, 02125-3393, USA

    Wei Ding & Yang Mu

  3. Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA

    Scott E. Crouter

Authors
  1. Xiang Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott E. Crouter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rong Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiang Ren or Wei Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, X., Ding, W., Crouter, S.E. et al. Activity recognition and intensity estimation in youth from accelerometer data aided by machine learning. Appl Intell 45, 512–529 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0773-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0773-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation