Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Closed-loop push recovery for inexpensive humanoid robots

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active balancing in autonomous humanoid robots is a challenging task due to the complexity of combining a walking gait with dynamic balancing, vision and high-level behaviors. Humans not only walk successfully over even and uneven terrain, but can recover from the interaction of external forces such as impacts with obstacles and active pushes. While push recovery has been demonstrated successfully in, expensive robots, it is more challenging with robots that are inexpensive, with limited power in actuators and less accurate sensing. This work describes a closed-loop feedback control method that uses an accelerometer and gyroscope to allow an inexpensive humanoid robot to actively balance while walking and recover from pushes. Three common balancing strategies: center of pressure, centroidal moment pivot, and step-out, for biped robots are studied. An experiment is performed to test three hand-tuned closed-loop feedback control configurations; using only the gyroscope, only the accelerometer, and a combination of both sensors to recover from pushes. Each of the sensors is discretized into four discrete domains in order to categorize pushes with different strengths. Experimental results show that the combination of gyroscope and accelerometer outperforms the other methods with 100% recovery from a light push and 70% recovery from a strong push. The proposed closed-loop feedback control is examined in both simulation and real-world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang Q, Yokoi K, Kajita S, Kaneko K, Aral H, Koyachi N, Tanie K (2001) Planning walking patterns for a biped robot. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 17(3):280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shojaeipour S, Parhizkar B, Hosseinmemar A, Shojaeipour A, Esfandiari H, Mobasheri E, Gebril B, Mohana Z (2010) Laser-pointer rangefinder between mobile robot and obstacles via webcam based. In: Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publ, Vol 447, pp 609–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hosseinmemar A, Baltes J, Anderson J, Lau MC, Lun CF, Wang Z (2018) Closed-loop push recovery for an inexpensive humanoid robot. In: Mouhoub M, Sadaoui S, Ait Mohamed O, Ali M (eds) Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 233–244

  4. Ishiguro H, Ono T, Imai M, Maeda T, Kanda T, Nakatsu R (2001) Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot. Ind Robot: Int J 28(6):498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cousins S (2010) ROS on the PR2. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 17(3):23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stephens B (2007) Humanoid push recovery. In: Proceedings of Humanoids-2007. IEEE, Pittsburgh, pp 589–595

  7. Stephens BJ, Atkeson CG (2010) Push recovery by stepping for humanoid robots with force controlled joints. In: Proceedings of Humanoids-2010, Nashville, pp 52–59

  8. Kim JY, Park IW, Oh JH (2007) Walking control algorithm of biped humanoid robot on uneven and inclined floor. J Intell Robot Syst 48:457–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuindersma S, Deits R, Fallon M, Valenzuela A, Dai H, Permenter F, Koolen T, Marion P, Tedrake R (2016) Optimization-based locomotion planning, estimation, and control design for Atlas. Auton Robot 40(3):429–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baltes J, Tu KY, Sadeghnejad S, Anderson J (2017) Hurocup: competition for multi-event humanoid robot athletes. Knowl Eng Rev 32:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt J, Carff J, Drakunov S, Goswami A (2006) Capture point: A step toward humanoid push recovery. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, pp 200–207

  12. Lee SH, Goswami A (2007) Reaction mass pendulum (RMP): An explicit model for centroidal angular momentum of humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of ICRA-2007, Rome, pp 4667–4672

  13. Kajita S, Morisawa M, Miura K, Nakaoka S, Harada K, Kaneko K, Kanehiro F, Yokoi K (2010) Biped walking stabilization based on linear inverted pendulum tracking. In: Proceedings of IROS 2010. IEEE, Taipei, pp 4489–4496

  14. Vukobratović M (1973) How to control artificial anthropomorphic systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3 (5):497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi SJ, Zhang BT, Hong D, Lee DD (2011) Online learning of a full body push recovery controller for omnidirectional walking. In: IEEE-RAS International conference on humanoid robots

  16. Hirai K, Hirose M, Haikawa Y, Takenaka T (1998) The development of Honda humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of ICRA-98, pp 1321–1326

  17. Morisawa M, Kanehiro F, Kaneko K, Mansard N, Sola J, Yoshida E, Yokoi K, Laumond JP (2010) Combining suppression of the disturbance and reactive stepping for recovering balance. In: Proceedings of IROS 2010, Taipei, pp 3150–3156

  18. Cho BK, Park SS, Oh JH (2010) Stabilization of a hopping humanoid robot for a push. In: Proceedings of IROS 2010, Taipei, pp 60–65

  19. Missura M, Behnke S (2013) Omnidirectional capture steps for bipedal walking. In: Proceedings of Humanoids-2013, Atlanta, pp 401–408

  20. Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1993) Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories. Exper Brain Res 95(2):308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitz A, Missura M, Behnke S (2011) Learning footstep prediction from motion capture. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 6556 LNAI, pp 97–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Iverach-Brereton C (2015) Rocking the Bongo Board: Humanoid Robotic Balancing on Dynamic Terrain. Master’s thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba

  23. Iverach-Brereton C, Postnikoff B, Baltes J, Hosseinmemar A (2017) Active balancing and turning for alpine skiing robots. Knowl Eng Rev 32:e6, 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tajima R, Honda D, Suga K (2009) Fast running experiments involving a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of ICRA-2009, pp 1571–1576

  25. Sreenath K, Park HW, Poulakakis I, Grizzle JW (2011) A compliant hybrid zero dynamics controller for stable, efficient and fast bipedal walking on MABEL. Int J Robot Res 30(9):1170–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yun SK, Goswami A (2011) Momentum-based reactive stepping controller on level and non-level ground for humanoid robot push recovery. In: Proceedings of IROS-2011, San Francisco

  27. Lee SH, Goswami A (2010) Ground reaction force control at each foot: A momentum-based humanoid balance controller for non-level and non-stationary ground. In: Proceedings of IROS-2010, Taipei, pp 3157–3162

  28. Hofmann A (2006) Robust execution of bipedal walking tasks from biomechanical principles. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  29. Robotis: Dynamixel (2018) http://www.robotis.us/dynamixel/

  30. Robotis: Usb2dynamixel (2017) http://support.robotis.com/en/product/auxdevice/interface/usb2dxl_manual.htm/

  31. Trossenrobotics: Robotis usb2dynamixel adapter (2018) https://www.trossenrobotics.com/robotis-bioloid-usb2dynamixel.aspx

  32. Pratt J, Carff J, Drakunov S, Goswami A (2006) Capture point: a step toward humanoid push recovery. In: Proceedings of Humanoids-2006, Genoa

  33. System RO (2016) Kinetic Kame robot operating system http://www.ros.org/

  34. Gazebo: Why gazebo? (1999) http://www.quanmax.com/site/product/qutepc-3000-series/

  35. System RO (2017) Rviz. http://wiki.ros.org/rviz

  36. RoboCup: Humanoid league technical challenge. http://www.robocuphumanoid.org/wp-content/uploads/HumanoidLeagueRules2015-06-29.pdf

  37. Ramezani S, Setaieshi A, Pourmohammadi N, Yarahmadi P, Arvand A, Fallah F, Hosseinmemar A, Santos J, Morris K, Lau MC et al (2017) Autman humanoid teen size team description paper robocup 2017 humanoid robot league. Teen-size Humanoid League, Team Description Paper, Nagoya

  38. Anderson J, Baltes J, Tu KY (2009) Improving robotics competitions for real-world evaluation of ai. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Experimental Design for Real-World Systems, Stanford

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Autonomous Agents Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada

    Amirhossein Hosseinmemar, John Anderson, Meng Cheng Lau, Chi Fung Lun & Ziang Wang

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Jacky Baltes

Authors
  1. Amirhossein Hosseinmemar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacky Baltes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meng Cheng Lau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chi Fung Lun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ziang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhossein Hosseinmemar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseinmemar, A., Baltes, J., Anderson, J. et al. Closed-loop push recovery for inexpensive humanoid robots. Appl Intell 49, 3801–3814 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01446-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01446-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation