Skip to main content
Log in

Sensor data-driven structural damage detection based on deep convolutional neural networks and continuous wavelet transform

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural damage detection is of very importance to improve reliability and safety of civil structures. A novel sensor data-driven structural damage detection method is proposed in this paper by combining continuous wavelet transform (CWT) with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). In this method, time-frequency images are obtained by CWT from original one-dimensional sensor signals. And, DCNN is designed to mine structural damage features from the time-frequency images and distinguish different structural damage condition. The proposed method is carried out on three-story building structure dataset and steel frame dataset. The experimental results show that the proposed method has the high accuracy and robustness of the damage detection compared with other existing machine learning methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pedro P, Steiger R (2020) Structural health monitoring of timber structures – Review of available methods and case studies. Constr Build Mater 248:118528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2020) Review of structural ealth monitoring methods regarding a multi-Sensor approach for damage assessment of metal and composite structures. Sensors 20(3):826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glisic B, Inaudi D (2007) Fibre optic methods for structural health monitoring. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Farrar C R, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A 365(1851):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Santos A, Figueiredo E, Silva MFM, Salesa CS, Costa JCWA (2016) Machine learning algorithms for damage detection: kernel-based approaches. J Sound Vib 363:584–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hazarika B B, Gupta D (2020) Density-weighted support vector machines for binary class imbalance learning. Neural Comput Applic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05240-8

  7. Li X, Yu W, Villegas S (2016) Structural health monitoring of building structures with online data mining methods. IEEE Syst J, 10(3):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazarika B B, Gupta D, Berlin M (2020) Modeling suspended sediment load in a river using extreme learning machine and twin support vector regression with wavelet conjunction. Environ Earth Sci 79(10):234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu J, Guo P F, Cheng Y W, Zhu H P, Wang X B, Shao X Y (2020) Ensemble generalized multiclass support-vector-machine-based health evaluation of complex degradation systems. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 25(5):2230–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh C K (2007) Bayesian learning for earthquake engineering applications and structural health monitoring. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/26563/

  11. Rogers TJ, Worden K, Fuentes R, Dervilis N, Tygesen UT, Cross EJ (2018) A Bayesian non-parametric clustering approach for semi-supervised Structural Health Monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 119(MAR.15):100–119

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu J, Hua K, Cheng Y, Zhu H, Wang Y (2019) Data-driven remaining useful life prediction via multiple sensor signals and deep long short-term memory neural network. ISA Trans 97:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivas U, Mousavi HS, Monga V, Hattel A, Jayarao B (2014) Simultaneous sparsity model for histopathological image representation and classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33(5):1163–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, Las Vegas, pp 770–778

  15. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, Boston, pp 1–9

  16. Luong M T, Pham H, Manning C D (2015) Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04025

  17. Wu J, Su Y, Cheng Y, Shao X, Deng C, Liu C (2018) Multi-sensor information fusion for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools by adaptive network based fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 68:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng Y, Zhu H, Wu J, Shao X (2018) Machine health monitoring using adaptive kernel spectral clustering and deep long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 15(2):987–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LeCun Y, Bengio Y (2003) Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. In: The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, pp 276–79

  20. Fan Z, Li C, Chen Y, Di Mascio P, Chen X, Zhu G, Loprencipe G (2020) Ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks for automatic pavement crack detection and measurement. Coatings 10(2):152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cawley P, Adams RD (1979) The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal 14(2):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xue Y, Li Y (2018) A Fast Detection Method via Region-Based Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Shield Tunnel Lining Defects. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 33(4).

  23. Gao Y, Mosalam KM (2018) Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition. Comput Aided Civ Inf Eng 33(9):748–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matarazzo TJ, Santi P, Pakzad SN, Carter K, Ratti C, Moaveni B, Osgood C, Jacob N (2018) Crowdsensing framework for monitoring bridge vibrations using moving smartphones. Proc IEEE 106(4):577–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Adeli H, Jiang X (2008) Intelligent infrastructure: Neural networks, wavelets, and chaos theory for intelligent transportation systems and smart structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  26. Pan H, Gui G, Lin Z, Yan C (2018) Deep BBN learning for health assessment toward decision-making on structures under uncertainties. KSCE J Civ Eng 22(3):928–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel JO, Avci O, Kiranyaz S, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2017) Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J Sound Vib 388:154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Miyamori Y, Mikami S, Saito T (2019) Vibration-based structural state identification by a 1‐dimensional convolutional neural network. Comput Aided Civ Inf Eng 34(9):822–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raich AM, Liszkai T (2003) Benefits of implicit redundant genetic algorithms for structural damage detection in noisy environments. Genetic and evolutionary computation - GECCO 2003, genetic and evolutionary computation conference, Chicago, IL, USA, July 12–16, 2003. Proceedings, Part II. DBLP

  30. Zhao W, Hua C, Dong D, Ouyang H (2019) A novel method for identifying crack and shaft misalignment faults in rotor systems under noisy environments based on CNN. Sensors 19(23):5158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mousavi AA, Zhang C, Masri SF, Gholipour G (2020) Structural damage localization and quantification based on a CEEMDAN hilbert transform neural network approach: a model steel truss bridge case study. Sensors 20(5):1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao Z, Liu C, Li Y, Li Y, Wang J, Lin B-S, Li J (2019) Noise rejection for wearable ECGs using modified frequency slice wavelet transform and convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 7:34060–34067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tehrani HA, Bakhshi A, Akhavat M (2019) An effective approach to structural damage localization in flexural members based on generalized S-transform. Sci Iran 26(6):3125–3139

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gou L, Li H, Zheng H, Li H, Pei X (2020) Aeroengine control system sensor fault diagnosis based on CWT and CNN. Math Probl Eng 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5357146

  35. Liu Q, Huang C (2019) A fault diagnosis method based on transfer convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 7:171423–171430

  36. Figueiredo E, Park G, Figueiras J, Farrar C, Worden K (2009) Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos

  37. Abdel JO, Avci O, Kiranyaz MS, Boashash B, Sodano H, Inman DJ (2018) 1-D CNNs for structural damage detection: Verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark data. Neurocomputing 275:1308–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the Grant No.51875225 and the 18th batch of graduate student innovation fund of Huazhong University of Science and Technology No. 2020yjsCXCY059.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Wu, J. et al. Sensor data-driven structural damage detection based on deep convolutional neural networks and continuous wavelet transform. Appl Intell 51, 5598–5609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02092-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02092-6

Keywords

Navigation