Skip to main content
Log in

A grouping-attention convolutional neural network for performance degradation estimation of high-speed train lateral damper

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance degradation of lateral damper has a direct impact on the operation of high-speed trains. Existing studies pay more attention to the fault diagnosis of lateral dampers, but the researches on the performance degradation estimation are not comprehensive. In this paper, a novel Grouping-Attention Convolutional Neural Network is proposed to estimate the performance degradation of lateral damper by regression. The proposed structure processes high-speed train vibration signals and fully considers the multi-channel characteristic of the signals. Specifically, the proposed structure consists of a Grouping-Attention part and an Output part. Before high-speed train vibration signals are input into Grouping-Attention part, the signals from different channels are first grouped according to frequency similarity. The Grouping-Attention part contains a Grouping part and an Attention Merging part. The Grouping part extracts features from the grouped signals in parallel. The Attention Merging part applies attention mechanism to merge features from each group. The Output part decodes the features obtained in Grouping-Attention part and outputs the estimation results. The effectiveness and superiority of the proposed structure are verified at 200 km/h and 300 km/h operating speeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen H, Jiang B, Ding SX, Huang B (2020) Data-driven fault diagnosis for traction systems in high-speed trains: a survey, challenges, and perspectives. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst

  2. Hu H, Tang B, Gong X, Wei W, Wang H (2017) Intelligent fault diagnosis of the high-speed train with big data based on deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 13(4):2106–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao Y, Zhang Y, Wen T, Li P (2019) Research on dynamic nonlinear input prediction of fault diagnosis based on fractional differential operator equation in high-speed train control system. Chaos: Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 29(1):013130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lebel D, Soize C, Funfschilling C, Perrin G (2020) High-speed train suspension health monitoring using computational dynamics and acceleration measurements. Veh Syst Dyn 58(6):911–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Tao X, Yu Z, Fujita H (2019) Train-movement situation recognition for safety justification using moving-horizon tbm-based multisensor data fusion. Knowl-Based Syst 177:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu W, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Fujita H (2021) Model predictive control for hybrid levitation systems of maglev trains with state constraints. IEEE Trans Veh Technol

  7. Qin N, Liang K, Huang D, Ma L, Kemp AH (2020) Multiple convolutional recurrent neural networks for fault identification and performance degradation evaluation of high-speed train bogie. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 31(12):5363–5376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Z, Song Y, Yin Z, Wang R, Zhang W (2019) Random response analysis of axle-box bearing of a high-speed train excited by crosswinds and track irregularities. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 68(11):10607–10617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Z, Cecati C, Ding SX (2015) A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques–part i: Fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(6):3757–3767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gou B, Ge X, Wang S, Feng X, Kuo JB, Habetler TG (2015) An open-switch fault diagnosis method for single-phase pwm rectifier using a model-based approach in high-speed railway electrical traction drive system. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(5):3816–3826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen J, Roberts C, Weston P (2008) Fault detection and diagnosis for railway track circuits using neuro-fuzzy systems. Control Eng Pract 16(5):585–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong M, Wang Q, Su Z, Cheng L (2014) In situ health monitoring for bogie systems of crh380 train on beijing–shanghai high-speed railway. Mech Syst Signal Process 45(2):378–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fort A, Mugnaini M, Vignoli V (2015) Hidden markov models approach used for life parameters estimations. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 136:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bian C, Yang S, Huang T, Xu Q, Liu J, Zio E (2019) Degradation state mining and identification for railway point machines. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 188:432–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng C, Liu M, Zhang B, Yin X, Fu C, Teng W (2020) Health assessment of high-speed train running gear system under complex working conditions based on data-driven model. Math Probl Eng 2020

  16. Li C, Luo S, Cole C, Spiryagin M (2017) An overview: modern techniques for railway vehicle on-board health monitoring systems. Veh Syst Dyn 55(7):1045–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Y, Jin W, Ren J, Sun Z (2019) A multi-perspective architecture for high-speed train fault diagnosis based on variational mode decomposition and enhanced multi-scale structure. Appl Intell 49(11):3923–3937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Si X-S, Wang W, Hu C-H, Zhou D-H (2011) Remaining useful life estimation–a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu R, Yang B, Zio E, Chen X (2018) Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review. Mech Syst Signal Process 108:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao M, Zhong S, Fu X, Tang B, Pecht M (2020) Deep residual shrinkage networks for fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Inf PP(99):1–1

    Google Scholar 

  21. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 25:1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ngo L, Cha J, Han JH (2019) Deep neural network regression for automated retinal layer segmentation in optical coherence tomography images. IEEE Trans Image Process PP(99):1–1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu X, Ye X, Gao Q (2019) Pipeline image segmentation algorithm and heat loss calculation based on gene-regulated apoptosis mechanism. Int J Press Vessel Pip 172

  25. Yu X, Lu Y H, Gao Q (2021) Pipeline image diagnosis algorithm based on neural immune ensemble learning. Int J Press Vessel Pip 189:104249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Su L, Ma L, Qin N, Huang D, Kemp AH (2019) Fault diagnosis of high-speed train bogie by residual-squeeze net. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 15(7):3856–3863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu Y, Jin W, Ren J, Sun Z (2019) Fault diagnosis of high-speed train bogie based on synchrony group convolutions. Shock Vib 2019

  28. Ding J (2018) Fault detection of a wheelset bearing in a high-speed train using the shock-response convolutional sparse-coding technique. Measurement 117:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao Y, Guo ZH, Yan JM (2017) Vibration signal analysis and fault diagnosis of bogies of the high-speed train based on deep neural networks. J Vibroeng 19(4):2456–2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiranyaz S, Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Ince T, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2021) 1d convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey. Mech Syst Signal Process 151:107398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fawaz H I, Forestier G, Weber J, Idoumghar L, Muller P-A (2019) Deep learning for time series classification: a review. Data Min Knowl Disc 33(4):917–963

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z, Yan W, Oates T (2017) Time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks: A strong baseline. In: 2017 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). IEEE, pp 1578–1585

  33. Ren J, Jin W, Wu Y (2020) A cnn-based structure for performance degradation estimation of high-speed train lateral damper. IEEE Access 8:198139–198151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lilly JM, Olhede SC (2010) On the analytic wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 56(8):4135–4156

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang NE, Wu Z (2008) A review on hilbert-huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies. Rev Geophys 46(2)

  36. Day WHE, Edelsbrunner H (1984) Efficient algorithms for agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods. J Classif 1(1):7–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu X, Zhu X, Li M, Wang L, Zhu E, Liu T, Kloft M, Shen D, Yin J, Gao W (2017) Multiple kernel k-means with incomplete kernels. In: Aaai, pp 1–1

  38. Su T, Dy JG (2007) In search of deterministic methods for initializing k-means and gaussian mixture clustering. Intell Data Anal 11(4):319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saxena A, Prasad M, Gupta A, Bharill N, Patel OP, Tiwari A, Er MJ, Ding W, Lin C-T (2017) A review of clustering techniques and developments. Neurocomputing 267:664–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G (2018) Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7132–7141

  41. Gao S, Cheng M-M, Zhao K, Zhang X-Y, Yang M-H, Torr PHS (2019) Res2net: a new multi-scale backbone architecture. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell

  42. Griffin D, Lim J (1984) Signal estimation from modified short-time fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 32(2):236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Flandrin P, Rilling G, Goncalves P (2004) Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Process Lett 11(2):112–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Feldman M (2011) Hilbert transform in vibration analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(3):735–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang NE, Wu Z (2008) A review on hilbert-huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies. Rev Geophys 46(2)

  46. Vijayan T, Sangeetha M, Kumaravel A, Karthik B (2020) Gabor filter and machine learning based diabetic retinopathy analysis and detection. Microprocess Microsyst 103353

  47. Yan R, Gao RX (2006) Hilbert–huang transform-based vibration signal analysis for machine health monitoring. IEEE Trans Instrumen Measur 55(6):2320–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Murtagh F, Contreras P (2012) Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 2(1):86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tan M, Pang R, Le QV (2020) Efficientdet: Scalable and efficient object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 10781–10790

  50. Liu S, Qi L, Qin H, Shi J, Jia J (2018) Path aggregation network for instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 8759–8768

  51. Tan M, Le Q (2019) Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, pp 6105–6114

  52. Chollet F (2017) Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1251–1258

  53. Dong S, Wu W, He K, Mou X (2020) Rolling bearing performance degradation assessment based on improved convolutional neural network with anti-interference. Measurement 151:107219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen H, Chai Z, Jiang B, Huang B (2020) Data-driven fault detection for dynamic systems with performance degradation: A unified transfer learning framework. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang B, Zhang S, Li W (2019) Bearing performance degradation assessment using long short-term memory recurrent network. Comput Ind 106:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. da Costa PRO, Akçay A, Zhang Y, Kaymak U (2020) Remaining useful lifetime prediction via deep domain adaptation. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 195:106682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Luo J, Zhang X (2021) Convolutional neural network based on attention mechanism and bi-lstm for bearing remaining life prediction. Appl Intell:1–16

  58. Yao D, Li B, Liu H, Yang J, Jia L (2021) Remaining useful life prediction of roller bearings based on improved 1d-cnn and simple recurrent unit. Measurement 175:109166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junxiao Ren.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, J., Jin, W., Wu, Y. et al. A grouping-attention convolutional neural network for performance degradation estimation of high-speed train lateral damper. Appl Intell 53, 658–682 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03368-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03368-9

Keywords

Navigation