Skip to main content
Log in

Linguistic Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy matrix game and its application in multi-criteria decision making

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a new Linguistic Pythagorean Hesitant Fuzzy Set (LPHFS) is introduced by considering the notions of linguistic fuzzy set and Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy set. LPHFS is a suitable path to deal with the hesitant situation in decision making, which is characterized by linguistic membership and non-membership degrees. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process determines multiple competing criteria in decision making. The traditional decision making approaches assume that each player is independent. But in real world competitive situation, the real fact is that each player tries to maximize individual benefit which causes a negative impact on other player. Here we propose a Linguistic Pythagorean Hesitant Fuzzy (LPHF) distance measure based on game theoretical framework to terminate the cross-influence problem. So our intention is to explore the generalized hybrid Euclidean distance measures of LPHFS. Then we analyze the application of LPHFS to MCDM game by using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The LPHFS is assumed to explore the uncertainty of Decision Makers (DMs), and the game theory is used to optimize the combination of criteria in interactive conditions. A modified version of TOPSIS and Ambika method are designed in the context of MCDM game with LPHFS. Finally, two real-life problems are considered to illustrate the applicability and feasibility of our proposed method, and then a comparison analysis is drawn among the obtained results with the existing methods to depict the usefulness of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Systs 20(1):87–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bector CR, Chandra S, Vijay V (2004) Duality in linear programming with fuzzy parameters and matrix games with fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Sets Systs 46:253–269

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beg I, Rashid T (2013) TOPSIS For hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int J Intell Syst 28:1162–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhaumik A, Roy SK, Li DF (2021) (α,β,γ)-cut set based ranking approach to solving bi-matrix games in neutrosophic environment. Soft Comput 25 (4):2729–2739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhaumik A, Roy SK, Weber GW (2020) Hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-linguistic term set approach in Prisoners’ dilemma game theory using TOPSIS: a case study on Human-trafficking. Central Euro J Oper Res 28:797–816

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhaumik A, Roy SK (2021) Intuitionistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy matrix games with a new aggregation operator for solving management problem. Granular Comput 6:359–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhaumik A, Roy SK, Weber GW (2021) Multi-objective linguistic-neutrosophic matrix game and its applications to tourism management. J Dynam Games 8(2):101–118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Campos L (1989) Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games. Fuzzy Sets Systs 32(3):275–289

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen YW, Larbani M (2005) Two-person zero-sum game approach for fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems. Fuzzy Sets Systs 157(1):34–51

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cagman N, Karatas S (2013) Intuitionistic fuzzy soft set theory and its decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 24(4):829–836

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Du YQ, Hou F, Zafar W, Yu Q, Zhai Y (2017) A novel method for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Intell Syst 32(10):1085–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg H (2016) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garg H (2018) Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multi attribute decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 33(6):1234–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garg H (2020) Linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute group decision-making process. Cogni Comput 12:1313–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera F, Martinez L (2001) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 31 (2):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang CL, Yoon KS (1981) Multiple attribute decision methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jana J, Roy SK (2018) Solution of matrix games with generalized trapezoidal fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Inform Engin 10(2):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jana J, Roy SK (2019) Dual hesitant fuzzy matrix games: based on new similarity measure. Soft Comput 23(18):8873–8886

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jana J, Roy SK (2021) Soft matrix game: a hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach. American J Mathe Manage Sci 40(2):107–119

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joshi D, Kumar S (2016) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Euro J Oper Res 248:183–191

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inform Sci 271:125–142

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang D, Xu ZS (2017) The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 60:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu C, Tang G, Liu P (2017) An approach to multi-criteria group decision making with unknown weight information based on Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators. Mathemat Prob Engi 5:1–18

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendel JM, John RIB (2002) Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10 (2):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Monroy L, Fernandez FR (2011) The Shapely-Shubik index for multi-criteria simple games. Euro J Oper Res 209:122–128

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishizaki I, Sakawa M (2001) Fuzzy and multiobjective games for conflict resolution. Physica, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision makings. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng XD, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30 (11):1133–1160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren PJ, Xu ZS, Gou XJ (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reneke JA (2009) A game theory formulation of decision making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. Nonlinear Anal 71:1239–1246

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy SK (2010) Game theory under MCDM and fuzzy set theory VDM (Verlag Dr. Müller, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roy SK, Mula P (2016) Solving matrix game with rough payoffs using genetic algorithm. Oper Res An Int J 16(1):117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roy SK, Bhaumik A (2018) Intelligent water management: A triangular type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy matrix games approach. Water Resour Manage 32(3):949–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roy SK, Maiti SK (2020) Reduction method of type-2 fuzzy variables and their applications to Stackelberg game. Appl Intelligence 50:1398–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roy SK, Jana J (2021) The multi-objective linear production planning games in triangular hesitant fuzzy set. Sadhana 46:176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01683-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakawa M, Nishizaki I (1994) Max-min solution for fuzzy multiobjective matrix games. Fuzzy Sets Syst 67(1):53–69

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh P (2014) A new method for solving dual hesitant fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions based on similarity measure. Appl Soft Comput 24:559–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Song Q, Kandel A (1999) A fuzzy approach to strategic games. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7:634–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. IEEE Int Confe Fuzzy Syst, Jeju Island, Korea, 1378–1382

  41. Verma T, Kumar A (2018) Ambika methods for solving matrix games with Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy payoffs. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(1):270–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xia MM, Xu ZS, Chen N (2013) Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Deci Negot 22(2):259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inform Sci 181(11):2128–2138

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu ZS (2007) Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optim Deci Making 6:109–121

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu ZS (2004) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making under linguistic preference relations. Inform Sci 166:19–30

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Xue W, Xu Z, Zeng XJ (2021) Solving matrix games based on Ambika method with hesitant fuzzy information and its application in the counter-terrorism issue. Appl Intell 51:1227– 1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proceed joint IFSA world cong NAFIPS annual meeting. Edmonton, Canada, pp 57–61

  48. Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28:436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang Y, Ding H, Chen ZS, Li YL (2016) A note on extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 31(1):68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang J, Xu Z, Dai Y (2021) Simple noncooperative games with intuitionistic fuzzy information and application in ecological management. Appl Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-002215-7https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-002215-7002215-7

  52. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Cont 8(3):338–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang H (2014) Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in MAGDM. J Appl Math, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/432092

  54. Zhang XL (2015) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21796

  55. Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29:1061–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang XL (2016) Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inform Sci 330:104–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang C, Li D (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy rough sets and its applications in multi-attribute decision making. J Chinese Computer Syst 37(7):1531–1535

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2015) Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Exp Syst Appli 42:873–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhu B, Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/879629

  60. Zhu B, Xu ZS (2014) Some results for dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:1657–166

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very much thankful to the respected Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editor and anonymous Reviewers for the precious comments that helped us so much too rigorously improve the quality of the paper. The research of Jishu Jana is partially supported by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) under JRF scheme with sanctioned no. 09/599(0067)/2016-EMR-I dated 20/10/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sankar Kumar Roy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of the paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jana, J., Roy, S.K. Linguistic Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy matrix game and its application in multi-criteria decision making. Appl Intell 53, 1–22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03442-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03442-2

Keywords

Navigation