Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unsupervised anomaly detection based method of risk evaluation for road traffic accident

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elevated road plays a very important role as corridors in urban traffic network, and the occurrence of traffic accidents often causes a great impact. In that sense, we propose a unique and enhanced Autoencoder (AE) to identify elevated road traffic accident (RTA) risk based on traffic anomaly detection in an unsupervised manner. An attention mechanism is introduced to extract the traffic condition features considering traffic spatiotemporal variation characteristics. Additionally, an enhanced loss is also introduced to optimize the ability of unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) approach to detect anomalous RTA risk and persistent anomalous traffic condition, which can significantly boost the anomaly detection performance using the contaminated traffic condition datasets. To assess the RTA risk, the evaluation mechanism and discriminant threshold are used to quantitatively analyze the detected abnormal traffic condition. Finally, experiments on real traffic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li H, Li Z, White RT, Wu X (2013) A real-time transportation prediction system. Appl Intell 39(4):793–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Wang X, Cao J, Tang M, Guo Y (2018) A multivariate short-term traffic flow forecasting method based on wavelet analysis and seasonal time series. Appl Intell 48(10):3827–3838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yakimov M (2020) Methods for assessing road traffic accident risks with changes in transport demand structure in cities. Transportation Research Procedia 50:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah SAR, Ahmad N, Shen Y, Kamal MA, Basheer MA, Brijs T (2019) Relationship between road traffic features and accidents: an application of two-stage decision-making approach for transportation engineers. J Saf Res 69:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng Z (2021) et al. Improved autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection 36(12):7103–7125

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu H, et al. (2018) Unsupervised anomaly detection via variational auto-encoder for seasonal KPIs in web applications, in Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 2018, International world wide web conferences steering committee: Lyon, France p 187–196

  7. Yu J, et al. (2021) Normality-calibrated autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection on data contamination

  8. Vorko-Jović A, Kern J, Biloglav Z (2006) Risk factors in urban road traffic accidents. J Saf Res 37(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen T-Y, Jou R-C (2019) Using HLM to investigate the relationship between traffic accident risk of private vehicles and public transportation. Transp Res A Policy Pract 119:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Theofilatos A (2017) Incorporating real-time traffic and weather data to explore road accident likelihood and severity in urban arterials. J Saf Res 61:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaa T (2014) ADHD and relative risk of accidents in road traffic: a meta-analysis. Accid Anal Prev 62:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapitanov V, Monina O, Silyanov V, Chubukov A (2020) Probabilistic assessment of main factors determining the road traffic accident rate in regions of Russia. Transportation Research Procedia 50:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alkheder S, Alrukaibi F, Aiash A (2020) Risk analysis of traffic accidents’ severities: an application of three data mining models. ISA Trans 106:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu R, et al. (2016) Crash risk analysis for Shanghai urban expressways: A Bayesian semi-parametric modeling approach. Accid Anal Prev 95(Pt B): p. 495–502

  15. Yu R, Abdel-Aty M (2013) Utilizing support vector machine in real-time crash risk evaluation. Accid Anal Prev 51:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu L, du B, Hu X, Sun L, Han L, Lv W (2021) Deep spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for traffic accident prediction. Neurocomputing 423:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Waizman G, Shoval S, Benenson I (2018) Traffic accident risk assessment with dynamic microsimulation model using range-range rate graphs. Accid Anal Prev 119:248–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurakina E, Kravchenko P, Brylev I, Rajczyk J (2020) Systemic approach to auditing road traffic accident black spots. Transportation Research Procedia 50:330–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Liu T, Bai Q, Shao W, Wang Q (2018) New systems-based method to conduct analysis of road traffic accidents. Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 54:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin Y, Li L, Jing H, Ran B, Sun D (2020) Automated traffic incident detection with a smaller dataset based on generative adversarial networks. Accid Anal Prev 144:105628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ali F, Ali A, Imran M, Naqvi RA, Siddiqi MH, Kwak KS (2021) Traffic accident detection and condition analysis based on social networking data. Accid Anal Prev 151:105973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Z, He Q, Gao J, Ni M (2018) A deep learning approach for detecting traffic accidents from social media data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 86:580–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tu Y, Lin S, Qiao J, Liu B (2021) Deep traffic congestion prediction model based on road segment grouping. Appl Intell 51:8519–8541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bui K-HN, Cho J, Yi H (2021) Spatial-temporal graph neural network for traffic forecasting: an overview and open research issues. Appl Intell 52:2763–2774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu C, Zhang A, Xu C, Chen Y (2021) Traffic speed prediction: spatiotemporal convolution network based on long-term, short-term and spatial features. Appl Intell 52:2224–2242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parsa AB, Taghipour H, Derrible S, Mohammadian A(K) (2019) Real-time accident detection: coping with imbalanced data. Accid Anal Prev 129:202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho, K., et al., Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. 2014

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Q.V.J.A.i.n.i.p.s. Le (2014) Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks

  29. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Y.J.a.e.-p. (2014) Bengio neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate arXiv:1409.0473

  30. Lin L, Wang Q, Sadek AW (2016) A combined M5P tree and hazard-based duration model for predicting urban freeway traffic accident durations. Accid Anal Prev 91:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Basso F, Basso LJ, Bravo F, Pezoa R (2018) Real-time crash prediction in an urban expressway using disaggregated data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 86:202–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vanlaar W, Yannis G (2006) Perception of road accident causes. Accid Anal Prev 38(1):155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Golob TF, Recker WW (2003) Relationships among urban freeway accidents, traffic flow, weather, and lighting conditions. J Transp Eng 129(4):342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hassan HM, Abdel-Aty MA (2013) Predicting reduced visibility related crashes on freeways using real-time traffic flow data. J Saf Res 45:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Benlagha N, Charfeddine L (2020) Risk factors of road accident severity and the development of a new system for prevention: new insights from China. Accid Anal Prev 136:105411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eboli L, Forciniti C, Mazzulla G (2020) Factors influencing accident severity: an analysis by road accident type. Transportation Research Procedia 47:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Raemdonck K, Macharis C (2014) The road accident analyzer: a tool to identify high-risk road locations. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 6(2):130–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kmet R, Dvorak Z, Kvet M (2019) Map of traffic accidents. Transportation Research Procedia 40:1418–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the Grant No. 71971135. And industrial and Informationalization Ministry of China for Cruise Program (No. 2018-473), and Key Project of National Social and Scientific Fund Program (18ZDA052).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, C., Chang, X., Xie, T. et al. Unsupervised anomaly detection based method of risk evaluation for road traffic accident. Appl Intell 53, 369–384 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03501-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03501-8

Keywords

Navigation