Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Time series cross-correlation network for wind power prediction

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wind power is an indispensable part of clean energy, but due to its inherent instability, it is necessary to predict the power generation of wind turbines after a period of time accurately. Most recent approaches are based on machine learning methods, which map time series data to a high-dimensional space, follow Markov process in the time dimension, and extract time series features following the chronological order. However, due to the time-instability and highly spatially correlated nature of wind power data, the prediction methods which follow the chronological order cannot extract all features in wind power time series. This will lose the information contained in the sequence and lack spatially relevant information. This paper proposes a TSCN-LSTM model that includes a Time Series Cross-correlation Network (TSCN) and a long short term memory (LSTM) decoder to predict wind power generation after 30 minutes. TSCN-LSTM not only collaboratively encodes the neighboring area and the neighboring time to fully tap the potential spatiotemporal correlation by TSCN, but also uses the LSTM decoder to enhance the timing relationship and to prevent the loss of timing information. At the same time, a data preprocessing method is proposed to enhance the spatial representation of the data. It makes that TSCN-LSTM can integrate the temporal and spatial feature extraction process to enhance the semantic expression of features. By establishing extensive interconnections between data in time dimension and space dimension, multiple types of cross-correlation information are generated which enables the model to distinguish different meteorological features and discover temporal and spatial correlations. A large number of experiments show that compared with the current leading SVR, LSTM, LSTM-EFG, GRU, Bi-LSTM and SATCN-LSTM methods, the wind power prediction mean square error is reduced by an average of 13.06%, 12.44%, 4.05%, 5.11%, 6.94% and 8.76%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gsänger S (2021) Worldwide wind capacity reaches 744 gigawatts - an unprecedented 93 gigawatts added in 2020. World Wind Energy Association

  2. Xydas E, Qadrdan M, Marmaras C, Cipcigan L, Jenkins N, Ameli H (2017) Probabilistic wind power forecasting and its application in the scheduling of gas-fired generators. Appl Energy 192:382–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colak I, Sagiroglu S, Yesilbudak M (2012) Data mining and wind power prediction: a literature review. Renew Energy 46:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soman SS, Zareipour H, Malik O, Mandal P (2010) A review of wind power and wind speed forecasting methods with different time horizons. In: North American Power Symposium 2010, pp 1–8. IEEE

  5. Liu Y, Guan L, Hou C, Han H, Liu Z, Sun Y, Zheng M (2019) Wind power short-term prediction based on lstm and discrete wavelet transform. Appl Sci 9(6):1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pérez JMP, Márquez FPG, Tobias A, Papaelias M (2013) Wind turbine reliability analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 23:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pliego Marugán A, Garcia márquez FP, Pé rez P, María J (2016) Optimal maintenance management of offshore wind farms. Energies 9(1):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pliego Marugán A, García Márquez FP, Lev B (2017) Optimal decision-making via binary decision diagrams for investments under a risky environment. Int J Prod Res 55(18):5271–5286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker R, Thrän D (2017) Completion of wind turbine data sets for wind integration studies applying random forests and k-nearest neighbors. Appl Energy 208:252–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen K, Yu J (2014) Short-term wind speed prediction using an unscented kalman filter based state-space support vector regression approach. Appl Energy 113:690–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marvuglia A, Messineo A (2012) Monitoring of wind farms’ power curves using machine learning techniques. Appl Energy 98:574–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiaoyun Q, Xiaoning K, Chao Z, Shuai J, Xiuda M (2016) Short-term prediction of wind power based on deep long short-term memory. In: 2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), pp 1148–1152 . IEEE

  13. Lynch P (2008) The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. J Comput Phys 227(7):3431–3444

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao J, Guo Z-H, Su Z-Y, Zhao Z-Y, Xiao X, Liu F (2016) An improved multi-step forecasting model based on wrf ensembles and creative fuzzy systems for wind speed. Appl Energy 162:808–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhaskar K, Singh S (2012) Awnn-assisted wind power forecasting using feed-forward neural network. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 3(2):306–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziel F, Croonenbroeck C, Ambach D (2016) Forecasting wind power–modeling periodic and non-linear effects under conditional heteroscedasticity. Appl Energy 177:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin Y, Yang M, Wan C, Wang J, Song Y (2018) A multi-model combination approach for probabilistic wind power forecasting. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 10(1):226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong Y-Y, Rioflorido CLPP (2019) A hybrid deep learning-based neural network for 24-h ahead wind power forecasting. Appl Energy 250:530–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ernst B, Oakleaf B, Ahlstrom M, Lange M, Moehrlen C, Lange B, Focken U, Rohrig K (2007) Predicting the wind. IEEE Power Energy Mag 5:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Billinton R, Chen H, Ghajar R (1996) A sequential simulation technique for adequacy evaluation of generating systems including wind energy. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 11(4):728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zuluaga CD, Alvarez MA, Giraldo E (2015) Short-term wind speed prediction based on robust kalman filtering: an experimental comparison. Appl Energy 156:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xue Y, Yu C, Zhao J, Li L, Liu X, Wu Q, Yang G (2015) A review on short-term and ultra-short-term wind power prediction. Autom Electr Power Syst 39(6):141–151

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang J, Brouste A, Tsui KL (2015) Some improvements of wind speed markov chain modeling. Renew Energy 81:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kani SP, Ardehali M (2011) Very short-term wind speed prediction: a new artificial neural network–markov chain model. Energy Convers Manag 52(1):738–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haque AU, Nehrir MH, Mandal P (2014) A hybrid intelligent model for deterministic and quantile regression approach for probabilistic wind power forecasting. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(4):1663–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tascikaraoglu A, Sanandaji BM, Poolla K, Varaiya P (2016) Exploiting sparsity of interconnections in spatio-temporal wind speed forecasting using wavelet transform. Appl Energy 165:735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Demolli H, Dokuz AS, Ecemis A, Gokcek M (2019) Wind power forecasting based on daily wind speed data using machine learning algorithms. Energy Convers Manag 198:111823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zafirakis D, Tzanes G, Kaldellis JK (2019) Forecasting of wind power generation with the use of artificial neural networks and support vector regression models. Energy Procedia 159:509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li L-L, Zhao X, Tseng M-L, Tan RR (2020) Short-term wind power forecasting based on support vector machine with improved dragonfly algorithm. J Clean Prod 118447:242

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lu P, Ye L, Zhong W, Qu Y, Zhai B, Tang Y, Zhao Y (2020) A novel spatio-temporal wind power forecasting framework based on multi-output support vector machine and optimization strategy, vol 254

  31. Peng H, Liu F, Yang X (2013) A hybrid strategy of short term wind power prediction. Renew Energy 50:590–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao Y-S, Wang W-Q, Huo X-P (2007) Study on the time-series wind speed forecasting of the wind farm based on neural networks. Energy Conservation Technology 25(2):106–108

    Google Scholar 

  33. Olaofe Z, Folly K (2012) Wind power estimation using recurrent neural network technique. In: IEEE Power and energy society conference and exposition in africa: intelligent grid integration of renewable energy resources (PowerAfrica), pp 1–7. IEEE

  34. Ding M, Zhou H, Xie H, Wu M, Nakanishi Y, Yokoyama R (2019) A gated recurrent unit neural networks based wind speed error correction model for short-term wind power forecasting. Neurocomputing 365:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hochreiter S, Bengio Y, Frasconi P, Schmidhuber J et al (2001) Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the difficulty of learning long-term dependencies, A field guide to dynamical recurrent neural networks. IEEE Press

  36. Treiber NA, Heinermann J, Kramer O (2016) Wind power prediction with machine learning. In: Computational sustainability, pp 13–29. Springer

  37. Yu R, Gao J, Yu M, Lu W, Xu T, Zhao M, Zhang J, Zhang R, Zhang Z (2019) Lstm-efg for wind power forecasting based on sequential correlation features. Futur Gener Comput Syst 93:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng X, Wang H, Lang J, Li W, Xu Q, Zhang Z, Cai T, Duan S, Liu F, Li C (2021) Ealstm-qr: Interval wind-power prediction model based on numerical weather prediction and deep learning. Energy 220:119692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiang L, Liu J, Yang X, Hu A, Su H (2022) Ultra-short term wind power prediction applying a novel model named satcn-lstm. Energy Convers Manag 252:115036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bai S, Kolter JZ, Koltun V (2018), vol 1803

  41. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 5998–6008

  42. Glorot X, Bordes A, Bengio Y (2011) Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp 315–323

  43. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, vol 15, pp 1929–1958

  44. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61976155).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China

    Ruiguo Yu, Xuewei Li, Jian Yu, Jie Gao, Zhiqiang Liu & Mei Yu

  2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin, 300350, China

    Ruiguo Yu, Xuewei Li, Jian Yu, Jie Gao, Zhiqiang Liu & Mei Yu

  3. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Networking, Tianjin, 300350, China

    Ruiguo Yu, Xuewei Li, Jian Yu, Jie Gao, Zhiqiang Liu & Mei Yu

  4. Tianjin International Engineering Institute, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China

    Yingzhou Sun

Authors
  1. Ruiguo Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yingzhou Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuewei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jie Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhiqiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuewei Li or Mei Yu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, R., Sun, Y., Li, X. et al. Time series cross-correlation network for wind power prediction. Appl Intell 53, 11403–11419 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04004-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04004-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation