Skip to main content
Log in

On the nonholonomic nature of human locomotion

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the kinematic realm, wheeled robot’s determining characteristic lies in its nonholonomic constraint. Indeed, the wheels of the robot unequivocally force the robot vehicle to move tangentially to its main axis. Here we test the hypothesis that human locomotion can also be partly described by such a nonholonomic system. This hypothesis is inspired by the trivial observation that humans do not walk sideways: some constraints of different natures (anatomical, mechanical…) may restrict the way humans generate locomotor trajectories. To model these constraints, we propose a simple differential system satisfying the so called rolling without sliding constraint. We validated the proposed model by comparing simulated trajectories with actual (recorded) trajectories obtained from goal-oriented locomotion of human subjects. These subjects had to start from a pre-defined position and direction in space and cross over to a distant porch so that both initial and final positions and directions were controlled. A comparative analysis was successfully undertaken by making use of numerical methods to compute the control inputs from actual trajectories. To achieve this, three body segments were used as local reference frames: head, pelvis and torso. The best simulations were obtained using the last body segment. We therefore suggest an analogy between the steering wheels and the torso segment, meaning that for the control of locomotion, the trunk behavior is constrained in a nonholonomic manner. Our approach allowed us to successfully predict 87 percent of trajectories recorded in seven subjects and might be particularly relevant for future pluridisciplinary research programs dealing with modeling of biological locomotor behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellaiche, A., & Risler, J.-J. (Eds.). (1996). Progress in mathematics : Vol. 144. Sub-Riemannian geometry. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. I. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz, A., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (1999). Multisensory integration in spatial orientation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 708–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasauer, S., Amorim, M. A., Viaud-Delmon, I., & Berthoz, A. (2002). Differential effects of labyrinthine dysfunction on distance and direction during blindfolded walking of a triangular path. Experimental Brain Research, 145(4), 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicheur, H., Glasauer, S., Vieilledent, S., & Berthoz, A. (2005a). Head direction control during active locomotion in humans. Cambridge: MIT Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicheur, H., Vieilledent, S., Richardso, M. J. E., Flash, T., & Berthoz, A. (2005b). Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: a comparison with hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 162(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicheur, H., Quang-Cuong, P., Arechavaleta, G., Laumond, J.-P., & Berthoz, A. (2007). The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans I. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26.

  • Hirukawa, H., et al. (2005). The human-size humanoid robot that can walk, lie down and get up. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 24, 755–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib, O. (1987). A unified approach to motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 3(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumond, J.-P., Sekhavat, S., & Lamiraux, F. (1998). Robot motion planning and control. In Lecture notes in control and information sciences : Vol. 229. Guidelines in nonholonomic motion planning for mobile robots. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Canny, J. F. (1993). Nonholonomic motion planning. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Multon, F., France, L., Cani-Gascuel, M.-P., & Debunne, G. (1999). Computer animation of human walking: a survey. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 10, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. (1991). Advanced robotics: redundancy and optimization. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quang-Cuong, P., Hicheur, H., Arechavaleta, G., Laumond, J.-P., & Berthoz, A. (2007). The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans II. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26.

  • Raibert, M. H. (1986). Legged robots that balance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siciliano, B., & Slotine, J.-J. E. (1991). A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic systems. In 5th international conference on advanced robotics, Pisa, Italy.

  • Sussmann, H. J. (1990). Nonlinear controllability and optimal control. New York: Marcel Dekker

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, V. S. (1984). Lie groups, Lie algebra and their representations. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieilledent, S., Kerlirzin, Y., Dalbera, S., & Berthoz, A. (2001). Relationship between velocity and curvature of a locomotor trajectory in human. Neuroscience Letters, 305, 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. A. (2004). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience Supplement, 3, 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T. (1984). Analysis and control of robot manipulators with redundancy. In M., Brady, & R., Paul (Eds.), 1st international symposium of robotics research (pp. 735–747). Cambridge: MIT Pres.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Arechavaleta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arechavaleta, G., Laumond, JP., Hicheur, H. et al. On the nonholonomic nature of human locomotion. Auton Robot 25, 25–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9075-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9075-2

Keywords

Navigation