Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fast and accurate map merging for multi-robot systems

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a new algorithm for merging occupancy grid maps produced by multiple robots exploring the same environment. The algorithm produces a set of possible transformations needed to merge two maps, i.e translations and rotations. Each transformation is weighted, thus allowing to distinguish uncertain situations, and enabling to track multiple cases when ambiguities arise. Transformations are produced extracting some spectral information from the maps. The approach is deterministic, non-iterative, and fast. The algorithm has been tested on public available datasets, as well as on maps produced by two robots concurrently exploring both indoor and outdoor environments. Throughout the experimental validation stage the technique we propose consistently merged maps exhibiting very different characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birk, A., & Carpin, S. (2006). Merging occupancy grids from multiple robots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(7), 1384–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpin, S., Birk, A., & Jucikas, V. (2005). On map merging. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 53(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Censi, A., Iocchi, L., & Grisetti, G. (2005). Scan matching in the Hough domain. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 2739–2744).

  • Craig, J. J. (2005). Introduction to robotics – mechanics and control. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoglu, G., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2000). Landmark-based matching algorithm for cooperative mapping by autonomous robots. In Distributed autonomous robotic systems 4 (pp. 251–260). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R., & Hart, P. (1972). Use of the hough transform to detect lines and curves in the pictures. Communications of the ACM, 15(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., Ko, J., Konolige, K., Limketai, B., Schulz, D., & Stewart, B. (2006). Distributed multirobot exploration and mapping. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(7), 1325–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey, M. R., & Johnson, D. S. (1979). Computers and intractability. A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. New York: Freeman.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grisetti, S., Stachniss, C., & Burgard, W. (2005). Improving grid-based slam with rao-blackwellized particle filters by adaptive proposals and selective resampling. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 2432–2437).

  • Howard, A., Parker, L. E., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2006). Experiments with a large heterogeneous mobile robot team: exploration, mapping, deployment and detection. International Journal of Robotics Research, 25(5–6), 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. H., & Beevers, K. R. (2005). Topological map merging. International Journal of Robotics Research, 24(8), 601–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konolige, K., Fox, D., Limketkai, B., Ko, J., & Steward, B. (2003). Map merging for distributed robot navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp. 212–217).

  • Kuipers, B. (1978). Modeling spatial knowledge. Cognitive Science, 2, 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Open Computer Vision Library (2008). http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/.

  • Openslam. (2007). http://www.openslam.org.

  • Oppenheim, A. V., & Willsky, A. S. (1997). Signal and systems. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. E. (2000). Current state of the art in distributed autonomous mobile robots. In L. E. Parker, G. Bekey & J. Barhen (Eds.), Distributed autonomous robotic systems 4 (pp. 3–12). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radish. (2007). The robotics data set repository. http://radish.sourceforge.net.

  • Thrun, S. (2001). A probabilistic online mapping algorithm for teams of mobile robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(5), 335–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2006). Probabilistic robotics. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. B., Dissanyake, G., & Durrant-Whyte, H. (2002). Towards multi-wehicle simultaneous localisation and mapping. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 2743–2748).

  • Zitová, B., & Flusser, J. (2003). Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing, 21, 977–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, University of California, 5200 North Lake Rd., Merced, CA, 95343, USA

    Stefano Carpin

Authors
  1. Stefano Carpin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Carpin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpin, S. Fast and accurate map merging for multi-robot systems. Auton Robot 25, 305–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-008-9097-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-008-9097-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation