Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The DOPLER meta-tool for decision-oriented variability modeling: a multiple case study

  • Published:
Automated Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variability of a product line is typically defined in models. However, many existing variability modeling approaches are rigid and don’t allow sufficient domain-specific adaptations. We have thus been developing a flexible and extensible approach for defining product line variability models. Its main purposes are to guide stakeholders through product derivation and to automatically generate product configurations. Our approach is supported by the DOPLER (Decision-Oriented Product Line Engineering for effective Reuse) meta-tool that allows modelers to specify the types of reusable assets, their attributes, and dependencies for their specific system and context. The aim of this paper is to investigate the suitability of our approach for different domains. More specifically, we explored two research questions regarding the implementation of variability and the utility of DOPLER for variability modeling in different domains. We conducted a multiple case study consisting of four cases in the domains of industrial automation systems and business software. In each of these case studies we analyzed variability implementation techniques. Experts from our industry partners then developed domain-specific meta-models, tool extensions, and variability models for their product lines using DOPLER. The four cases demonstrate the flexibility of the DOPLER approach and the extensibility and adaptability of the supporting meta tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asikainen, T., Männistö, T., Soininen, T.: A unified conceptual foundation for feature modelling. In: 10th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2006), Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 31–40. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batory, D.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: 9th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2005), Rennes, France. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7–20. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, K., Bishop, J., Muthig, D.: Tracing software product line variability: from problem to solution space. In: SAICSIT ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries, pp. 182–191. South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Pretoria (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T., She, S., Lotufo, R., Wasowski, A., Czarnecki, K.: Variability modeling in the real: a perspective from the operating systems domain. In: ASE 2010, 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Antwerp, Belgium, September 20–24, 2010, pp. 73–82. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G.H., Faulk, S.R., Weiss, D.M.: Introduction to synthesis. Tech. rep. Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, VA, USA (1990)

  • Charles, P., Fuhrer, R.M., Stanley, M., Sutton, J.: IMP: A meta-tooling platform for creating language-specific IDEs in Eclipse. In: Proc. of the 22nd IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering, New York, NY, USA, pp. 485–488. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium, S.P.: Synthesis guidebook. Tech. rep., SPC-91122-MC. Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, Virginia (1991)

  • Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.: Generative Programming: Methods, Techniques, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki, K., Pietroszek, K.: Verifying feature-based model templates against well-formedness ocl constraints. In: GPCE ’06: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering, New York, NY, USA, pp. 211–220. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 10(1), 7–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki, K., Kim, C.H.P., Kalleberg, K.T.: Feature models are views on ontologies. In: SPLC, pp. 41–51 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashofy, E., van der Hoek, A., Taylor, R.: A highly-extensible, xml-based architecture description language. In: Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA’01), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 103–112. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dashofy, EM, van der Hoek, A., Taylor, R.N.: An infrastructure for the rapid development of xml-based architecture description languages. In: ICSE, pp. 266–276 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P., Rabiser, R.: Domain-specific adaptations of product line variability modeling. In: Ralyté, J., Brinkkemper, S., Henderson-Sellers, B. (eds.) Situational Method Engineering: Fundamentals and Experiences, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference, Geneva, Switzerland. IFIP, vol. 244, pp. 238–251. Springer, Berlin (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhungana, D., Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P., Neumayer, T.: Integrated tool support for software product line engineering. In: ASE, pp. 533–534 (2007b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P., Rabiser, R., Neumayer, T.: Structuring the modeling space and supporting evolution in software product line engineering. J. Syst. Softw. 83(7), 1108–1122 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhungana, D., Heymans, P., Rabiser, R.: A formal semantics for decision-oriented variability modeling with DOPLER. In: Proc. 4th International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VaMoS 2010), ICB-Research Report No. 37, pp. 29–35. University of Duisburg Essen, Linz (2010b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Estublier, J., Vega, G.: Reuse and variability in large software applications. In: 10th European Software Engineering Conference held jointly with 13th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 316–325. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgy, C.L., Shepard, S.J.: Rete: a fast match algorithm. AI Expert 2(1), 34–40 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, T., Muthig, D., Pech, D.: Understanding decision models: visualization and complexity reduction of software variability. In: Heymans, P., Kang, K., Metzger, A., Pohl, K. (eds.) Second International Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems, ICB Research Report, Essen, Germany, vol. 22, pp. 111–119 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Froschauer, R., Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P.: Managing the life-cycle of industrial automation systems with product line variability models. In: 34th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Parma, Italy, pp. 35–42 (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Froschauer, R., Zoitl, A., Grünbacher, P.: Development and adaptation of IEC 61499 automation and control applications with runtime variability models. In: Proceedings 7th IEEE Int’l Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN 2009), Cardiff, UK, pp. 905–910 (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garlan, D., Allen, R., Ockerbloom, J.: Exploiting style in architectural design environments. In: Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 175–188 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomaa, H.: Designing Software Product Lines with UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomaa, H., Shin, M.E.: Multiple-view meta-modeling of software product lines. In: ICECCS ’02: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, Washington, DC, USA, p. 238. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grünbacher, P., Rabiser, R., Dhungana, D., Lehofer, M.: Model-based customization and deployment of eclipse-based tools: Industrial experiences. In: 24th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2009), Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 247–256 (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, J., Hosking, J., Zhu, N., Liu, N.: Generating domain-specific visual language editors from high-level tool specifications. In: 21st IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’06), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 25–36. IEEE, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, F., Brinkkemper, S.: Design and implementation of a method base management system for a situational case environment. In: Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC, pp. 430–438 (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C., Ralyté, J.: Situational method engineering: fragments or chunks. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE Forum) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, P., Schobbens, P., Trigaux, J., Matulevicius, R., Classen, A., Bontemps, Y.: Towards a comparative evaluation of feature diagram languages. In: Software and Services Variability Management Workshop—Concepts, Models and Tools, HUT-SoberIT-A3, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1–16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Nowak, W., Peterson, S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Tech. rep., Technical Report CMU/SEI-90TR-21. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1990)

  • Magee, J., Dulay, N., Eisenbach, S., Kramer, J.: Specifying distributed software architectures. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Software Engineering Conference. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 989, pp. 137–153. Springer, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, J., Sellier, D.: Decision model and flexible component definition based on xml technology. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Software Product-Family Engineering 5th International Workshop, PFE 2003, pp. 466–472. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 26(1), 70–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiser, R.: Flexible and user-centered visualization support for product derivation. In: ViSPLE 2008—2nd International Workshop on Visualisation in Software Product Line Engineering, held in conjunction with the 12th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2008), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 323–328 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiser, R., Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P.: Tool support for product derivation in large-scale product lines: a wizard-based approach. In: ViSPLE 2007—1st International Workshop on Visualisation in Software Product Line Engineering, held in conjunction with the 11th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2007), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 119–124 (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P., Dhungana, D.: Supporting product derivation by adapting and augmenting variability models. In: 11th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2007), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 141–150 (2007b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiser, R., Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P., Burgstaller, B.: Value-based elicitation of product line variability: an experience report. In: Second International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VAMOS 2008), Essen, Germany, pp. 73–79 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiser, R., Wolfinger, R., Grünbacher, P.: Three-level customization of software products using a product line approach. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, pp. 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C.: Real World Research, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131–161 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, K., John, I.: A customizable approach to full-life cycle variability management. J. Sci. Comput. Program. 53(3), 259–284 (2004). Special Issue on Variability Management

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schobbens, P., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J., Bontemps, Y.: Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Int. J. Comput. Telecommun. Netw. 51(2), 456–479 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C.: Feature diagrams: a survey and a formal semantics. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Minneapolis/St.Paul, Minnesota, pp. 136–145 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnema, M., Deelstra, S.: Classifying variability modeling techniques. J. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49, 717–739 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M., Tischer, C., Boss, B., Müller, A., Pertler, O., Stolz, W., Ferber, S.: Introducing pla at Bosch gasoline systems: experiences and practices. In: Nord, R. (ed.) Third Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2004), Boston, MA, USA, pp. 34–50. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, S., Hein, A.: Modeling and using product line variability in automotive systems. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 66–72 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolvanen, J.P., Rossi, M.: MetaEdit+: Defining and using domain-specific modeling languages and code generators. In: Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications (OOPLSA’03), Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 92–93. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, F., Schmid, K., Rommes, E.: Software Product Lines in Action—The Best Industrial Practice in Product Line Engineering. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ommering, R., van der Linden, F., Kramer, J., Magee, J.: The koala component model for consumer electronics software. Computer 33(3), 78–85 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlage, M., Kiesgen, T.: Five years of product line engineering in a small company. In: 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2005), St. Louis, MO, USA, pp. 534–543. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vierhauser, M., Grünbacher, P., Egyed, A., Rabiser, R., Heider, W.: Flexible and scalable consistency checking on product line variability models. In: 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 63–72 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R., Reiter, S., Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P., Prähofer, H.: Supporting runtime system adaptation through product line engineering and plug-in techniques. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on Composition-Based Software Systems, Madrid, Spain, pp. 21–30. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.: Case Study Research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, N., Grundy, J., Hosking, J.: Pounamu: a meta-tool for exploratory domain-specific visual language tool development. J. Syst. Softw. 80(8), 1390–1407 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Software Engineering Integration for Flexible Automation Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria

    Deepak Dhungana

  2. Institute Systems Engineering and Automation, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria

    Paul Grünbacher

  3. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Automated Software Engineering, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria

    Rick Rabiser

Authors
  1. Deepak Dhungana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Grünbacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rick Rabiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Dhungana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P. & Rabiser, R. The DOPLER meta-tool for decision-oriented variability modeling: a multiple case study. Autom Softw Eng 18, 77–114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-010-0076-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-010-0076-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation