Skip to main content
Log in

SentiTurkNet: a Turkish polarity lexicon for sentiment analysis

  • Project Notes
  • Published:
Language Resources and Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sentiment analysis aims to extract the sentiment polarity of given segment of text. Polarity resources that indicate the sentiment polarity of words are commonly used in different approaches. While English is the richest language in regard to having such resources, the majority of other languages, including Turkish, lack polarity resources. In this work we present the first comprehensive Turkish polarity resource, SentiTurkNet, where three polarity scores are assigned to each synset in the Turkish WordNet, indicating its positivity, negativity, and objectivity (neutrality) levels. Our method is general and applicable to other languages. Evaluation results for Turkish show that the polarity scores obtained through this method are more accurate compared to those obtained through direct translation (mapping) from SentiWordNet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. http://www.seslisozluk.net.

  2. http://www.tdk.gov.tr.

  3. This dataset is collected from http://www.beyazperde.com.

References

  • Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., & Passonneau, R. (2011). Sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In: Proceedings of the workshop on languages in social media (pp. 30–38). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Akın, A. A., & Akın, M. D. (2007). Zemberek, an open source NLP framework for Turkic languages. Structure, 10, 1–5.

  • Aytekin, C. (2013). An opinion mining task in Turkish language: A model for assigning opinions in Turkish blogs to the polarities. Journalism and Mass Communication, 3(3), 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC, 10, 2200–2204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, O., Çetinoğlu, Ö., & Oflazer, K. (2004). Building a wordnet for Turkish. Romanian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 7(1–2), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco, C., Patti, V., & Bolioli, A. (2013). Developing corpora for sentiment analysis: The case of irony and senti-tut. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burges, C. J. (1998). A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(2), 121–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Durrani, T., & Zhang, J. (2012). Towards a chinese common and common sense knowledge base for sentiment analysis. In H. Jiang, W. Ding, M. Ali, X. Wu (Eds.), Advanced research in applied artificial intelligence (pp. 437–446). Berlin, Springer.

  • Cambria, E., Olsher, D., & Rajagopal, D. (2014). SenticNet 3: A common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition-driven sentiment analysis. In: Twenty-eighth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 1515–1521).

  • Choi, Y., & Cardie, C. (2009). Adapting a polarity lexicon using integer linear programming for domain-specific sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: Volume 2-Volume 2 (pp. 590–598). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Das, A., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2010). SentiWordNet for Indian languages (pp. 56–63). China: Asian Federation for Natural Language Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demiröz, G., Yanikoglu, B., Tapucu, D., & Saygin, Y. (2012). Learning domain-specific polarity lexicons. In: 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW) (pp. 674–679). IEEE.

  • Eroğul, U. (2009). Sentiment analysis in Turkish. MSc thesis, Middle East University, Turkey.

  • Gezici, G., Yanikoglu, B., Tapucu, D., & Saygın, Y. (2012). New features for sentiment analysis: Do sentences matter? In: SDAD 2012 The 1st international workshop on sentiment discovery from affective data (p. 5).

  • Hatzivassiloglou, V., & Mckeown, K. R. (1997). Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In: Proceedings of ACL-97, 35th annual meeting (pp. 174–181). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Havasi, C., Cambria, E., Schuller, B., Liu, B., & Wang, H. (2013). Knowledge-based approaches to concept-level sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 12–14.

  • Havasi, C., Speer, R., & Alonso, J. (2007). ConceptNet 3: A flexible, multilingual semantic network for common sense knowledge. In N. Nicolov, G. Angelova and R. Mitkov (Eds.), Recent advances in natural language processing (RANLP) (pp. 27–29). Borovets.

  • Haykin, S. (1994). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, G., Donkin, A., & Witten, I. H. (1994). Weka: A machine learning workbench. In: Proceedings of the 1994 second Australian and New Zealand conference on intelligent information systems, 1994 (pp. 357–361). IEEE.

  • Hosmer, D. W, Jr, & Lemeshow, S. (2004). Applied logistic regression. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 168–177). ACM.

  • Hung, C., & Lin, H.-K. (2013). Using objective words in SentiWordNet to improve word-of-mouth sentiment classification. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 0047–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, M., Fidan, G., & Toroslu, I. H. (2012). Sentiment analysis of Turkish political news. In: Proceedings of the the 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM international joint conferences on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology-Volume 01 (pp. 174–180). IEEE Computer Society.

  • Lenat, D. B., & Guha, R. V. (1989). Building large knowledge-based systems; Representation and inference in the Cyc project. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

  • Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. USA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1995). Wordnet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine learning., McGraw-Hill series in computer science New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oflazer, K., & Bozşahin, H. C. (1994). Turkish natural language processing initiative. In: Proceedings of the third Turkish symposium on artificial intelligence and artificial neural networks, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10 (pp. 79–86). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N., Das, D., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). Enhanced SenticNet with affective labels for concept-based opinion mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strapparava, C., Valitutti, A., et al. (2004). Wordnet affect: An affective extension of wordnet. LREC, 4, 1083–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sureka, A., Goyal, V., Correa, D., & Mondal, A. (2009). Polarity classification of subjective words using common-sense knowledge-base. In H. Sakai, M. Chakraborty, A.-E. Hassanien, D. Slezak, W. Zhu (Eds.), Rough sets, fuzzy sets, data mining and granular computing (pp. 486–493). Berlin: Springer.

  • Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G. (2012). Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, A. C.-R., Wu, C.-E., Tsai, R. T.-H., Hsu, J. Y.-J., et al. (2013). Building a concept-level sentiment dictionary based on commonsense knowledge. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, P. D. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (pp. 417–424). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Vural, A. G., Cambazoğlu, B. B., Şenkul, P., & Tokgöz, Z. Ö. (2012). A framework for sentiment analysis in Turkish: Application to polarity detection of movie reviews in Turkish. In: E. Gelenbe, & R. Lent (Eds.), ISCIS (pp. 437–445). London: Springer.

  • Wang, Q.-F., Cambria, E., Liu, C.-L., & Hussain, A. (2013). Common sense knowledge for handwritten chinese text recognition. Cognitive Computation, 5(2), 234–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 347–354). Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Ye, Q., Zhang, Z., & Law, R. (2009). Sentiment classification of online reviews to travel destinations by supervised machine learning approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 6527–6535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahim Dehkharghani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehkharghani, R., Saygin, Y., Yanikoglu, B. et al. SentiTurkNet: a Turkish polarity lexicon for sentiment analysis. Lang Resources & Evaluation 50, 667–685 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9307-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9307-6

Keywords

Navigation