Abstract
With the tens of thousands of fonts that are now readily available, it is non-trivial to select the most suitable font for a given use case. Considering the impact of the choice of font on human perception of the text, there is a strong need for semantic font search and recommendation. Aiming to fulfill this need, we induce a typographical lexicon providing associations between words and fonts. For this purpose, we determine font vectors for basic and complex emotions, based on word similarities, antonymy information, and Plutchik’s Wheel of Emotions. We create a large font lexicon, named FontLex, relying on emotion associations between the words and the fonts. We evaluate our results through user studies and find that for the majority of the evaluated words, the fonts recommended by FontLex are preferred. We also further extend the dataset using synonyms of font attributes and emotion names. Finally, using CNN embeddings of the fonts, we expand our attribute score assignment to new fonts. The resulting FontLex resource provides mappings between 6.7K words and 2K fonts. Our proof of concept application demonstrates how FontLex can be invoked to obtain semantic font recommendation for poster design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For instance, https://www.dafont.com/ and http://www.1001fonts.com/.
All studies in this paper received IRB approval.
Typically, multiple fonts are used in a single document, and it is a common task to obtain a pair of fonts that both contrast and complement each other.
References
Bloch, M. (2017). 1001 Fonts. Retrived 29 July 2017 from, http://www.1001fonts.com.
Canvacom. (2017). Canva font combinations. Retrived 29 July 2017 from, https://www.canva.com/font-combinations/.
Childers, T. L., & Jass, J. (2002). All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 93–106.
dafontcom. (2017). Retrived 29 July 2017 from, http://www.dafont.com.
Data Scope Analytics (2017). Retrived 29 July 2017 from, Fontstellations. https://datascopeanalytics.com/blog/fontstellations/.
Fellbaum, C. (1998). Wordnet: an eletronic lexical database. cambridge, massachusetts, eua.
Fligner, A. (2013). The effect of packaging typeface on product perception and evaluation. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.
Fox, D. (2010). Free will for typeface selection: Myth or reality? Usability News, 12, 1.
Hazlett, R. L., Larson, K., Shaikh, A. D., & Chaparo, B. S. (2013). Two studies on how a typeface congruent with content can enhance onscreen communication. Information Design Journal, 20, 3.
Ho, K. (2017). Organizing the world of fonts with ai. Retrived 29 July 2017 from,https://medium.com/@kho98.
Juni, S., & Gross, J. S. (2008). Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 35–42.
Kulahcioglu, T., & De Melo, G. (2018). Fontlex: A typographical lexicon based on affective associations. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018).
Kulahcioglu, T., & de Melo, G. (2018). Predicting semantic signatures of fonts. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, IEEE.
Kulahcioglu, T., & de Melo, G. (2019). Paralinguistic recommendations for affective word clouds. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM, New York, NY, USA, IUI ’19, pp 132–143, https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302327
Lewis, C., & Walker, P. (1989). Typographic influences on reading. British Journal of Psychology, 80(2), 241–257.
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3111–3119.
Mills, H. (2017). Font pair. Retrived 29 July 2017 from,http://fontpair.co/.
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465.
O’Donovan, P., Libeks, J., Agarwala, A., & Hertzmann, A. (2014). Exploratory font selection using crowdsourced attributes. ACM Transaction of Graph, 33(4), 92:1–92:9.
Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344–350.
Qiao, J. (2017). Fontjoy—font pairing made simple. Retrived 29 July 2017 from, http://fontjoy.com/.
Sam Berlow, S. C., & Sherman, N. (2017). Fonts in use. Retrived 29 July 2017 from, https://fontsinuse.com/.
Shaikh, A. D. (2007a). The effect of website typeface appropriateness on the perception of a company’s ethos. Usability News, 9, 2.
Shaikh, A. D. (2007b). Psychology of onscreen type: Investigations regarding typeface personality, appropriateness, and impact on document perception. PhD thesis.
Shaikh, A. D., Chaparro, B. S., & Fox, D. (2006). Perception of fonts: Perceived personality traits and uses. Usability News, 8(1), 1–6.
Shaikh, A. D., Fox, D., & Chaparro, B. S. (2007). The effect of typeface on the perception of email. Usability News, 9(1), 1–7.
Tsonos, D., & Kouroupetroglou, G. (2016). Prosodic mapping of text font based on the dimensional theory of emotions: a case study on style and size. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13636-016-0087-8.
Van Rompay, T. J., & Pruyn, A. T. (2011). When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape-typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 599–610.
Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Spence, C. (2014). Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds. Food Quality and Preference, 34, 88–95.
Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Hyndman, S., & Spence, C. (2015). The taste of typeface. I-Perception, 6, 4.
Wang, Z., Yang, J., Jin, H., Shechtman, E., Agarwala, A., Brandt, J., et al. (2015). Deepfont: Identify your font from an image. Proc (pp. 451–459). ACM Multimedia: ACM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulahcioglu, T., de Melo, G. Semantics-aware typographical choices via affective associations. Lang Resources & Evaluation 55, 105–126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09499-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09499-0