Abstract
This paper compares the performance of WAP 1.x to that of Internet protocols. We implement a WAP client and a WAP gateway based on the WAP version 1.1 and assess the overall response time to compare it to those of HTTP and TCP. We use a W-CDMA emulator to evaluate WAP 1.x performance in high-speed wireless networks such as 3G. The results show that all protocols have comparable performance (i.e., response time) except when transmitting large content sets (e.g., multimedia data files), in which case HTTP/TCP offers better performance than WAP 1.x. We also evaluate WAP specific functions such as the binary encoding of WAP headers and WML contents. While binary encoding is effective for small content sets, its effectiveness and performance are questionable for large content sets. Based on the results of our evaluation, we conclude that standard Internet protocols (i.e., HTTP/TCP) are suitable for high-speed wireless networks such as 3G.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WAP Forum Specifications, http://www.wapforum.org/.
P. Chaudhury et al., The 3GPP proposal for IMT-2000, IEEE Communications Magazine (December 1999).
M. Metter et al., WAP enabling existing HTML applications, in: Proceedings of 1st Australasian User Interface Conference (January 2000).
S. Gordon et al., Analyzing the WAP class 2 wireless transaction protocol using coloured Petri nets, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Aerospace Congress incorporating the 12th National Space Engineering Symposium (September 1999).
T. Kunz et al., WAP traffic: Description and comparison to WWW traffic, in: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM 2000) (August 2000).
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) “RLC Protocol Specification” (September 2001).
R. Fielding et al., Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1, RFC 2616 (June 1999).
H. Inamura et al., TCP over second (2.5G) and third (3G) generation wireless networks, RFC3481 (February 2003).
M. Mathis et al., TCP selective acknowledgment options, RFC 2018 (October 1996).
M. Allman et al., Increased TCP’s initial window, RFC 2414 (September 1998).
J. Postel et al., Transmission control protocol, RFC793 (September 1981).
V. Jacobson, TCP extensions for high performance, RFC1323 (May 1992).