Skip to main content
Log in

On separation of platform-independent particles in user interfaces

Survey on separation of concerns in user interface design

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexity of user interface (UI) design grows quickly with the number of application concerns. Such complexity compounds with additional requirement of contextual-awareness (i.e., adapt to user location, skill level, etc.) and support of heterogeneous devices and platforms (e.g., web, mobile app). Implementation support of such a wide-range of orthogonal concerns often results in restatement of a significant portion of the UI description using platform-specific components. Replication requires repeated implementation decision, greatly increasing development costs since each version/context variant may need separate development. Naturally, such replication also produces error prone maintenance because code updates must correlate among all replicas. Using separation of concerns, the application can be decomposed into fine-grain fragments, which we call particles, some of which are platform independent and others are not. Using this decomposition, this paper addresses the above inefficiency by dynamically composing particles at runtime that match user demands, context, and target platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Meteor, JavaScript App Platform, 2015, http://www.meteor.com.

References

  1. Ali, M., Prez-Quiones, M., Abrams, M., Shell, E.: Building multi-platform user interfaces with UIML. In: Kolski, C., Vanderdonckt, J. (eds.) Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces III, pp. 255–266. Springer, Netherlands (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard, E.: JSR 303: Bean validation (2009). http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303

  3. Blumendorf, M., Lehmann, G., Albayrak, S.: Bridging models and systems at runtime to build adaptive user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, EICS’10, pp. 9–18. ACM, New York, NY (2010)

  4. Burns, E., Griffin, N.: JavaServer Faces 2.0, The Complete Reference, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., Vanderdonckt, J.: A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interact. Comput. 15(3), 289–308 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerny, T., Cemus, K., Donahoo, M.J., Song, E.: Aspect-driven, data-reflective and context-aware user interfaces design. SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev. 13(4), 53–65 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerny, T., Donahoo, M.J.: Separating out platform-independent particles of user interfaces. Information Science and Applications, pp. 941–948. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cerny, T., Macik, M., Donahoo, M.J., Janousek, J.: Efficient description and cache performance in aspect-oriented user interface design. In: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (2014)

  9. Cerny, T., Matl, L., Cemus, K., Donahoo, M.J.: Evaluation of separated concerns in web-based delivery of user interfaces. Information Science and Applications, pp. 933–940. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cerny, T., Song, E.: Model-driven rich form generation. Inf. Int. Interdiscip. J. 15(7, SI), 2695–2714 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.W.: Components and generative programming (invited paper). SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 24(6), 2–19 (1999)

  12. DeMichiel, L.: JSR 317: JavaTM persistence API, version 2.0 (2009). http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317

  13. DeMichiel, L., Keith, M.: JSR 220: Enterprise javabeans version 3.0. java persistence API (2006). http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=220

  14. Fowler, M.: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green, B., Seshadri, S.: AngularJS, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hanson, R., Tacy, A.: GWT in Action: Easy Ajax with the Google Web Toolkit. Manning Publications Co., Greenwich (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kennard, R., Edmonds, E., Leaney, J.: Separation anxiety: stresses of developing a modern day separable user interface. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions pp. 225–232 (2009)

  19. Kiczales, G., Irwin, J., Lamping, J., Loingtier, J.M., Lopes, C.V., Maeda, C., Mendhekar, A.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: IECOOP’97-Object-Oriented Programming, 11th European Conference, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242 (1997)

  20. Kleppe, A.G., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laddad, R.: AspectJ in Action: Enterprise AOP with Spring Applications, 2nd edn. Manning Publications Co., Greenwich (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Larman, C.: Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. López-Jaquero, V., Montero, F., Real, F.: Designing user interface adaptation rules with t: Xml. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, IUI’09, pp. 383–388. ACM, New York (2009)

  24. Macik, M., Cerny, T., Slavik, P.: Context-sensitive, cross-platform user interface generation. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 8(2), 217–229 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mori, G., Paterno, F., Santoro, C.: Design and development of multidevice user interfaces through multiple logical descriptions. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(8), 507–520 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morin, B., Barais, O., Jezequel, J.M., Fleurey, F., Solberg, A.: Models@ run.time to support dynamic adaptation. Computer 42(10), 44–51 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schattkowsky, T., Lohmann, M.: Uml model mappings for platform independent user interface design. In: Bruel, J.M. (ed.) Satellite Events at the MoDELS 2005 Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3844, pp. 201–209. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  28. Schlee, M., Vanderdonckt, J.: Generative programming of graphical user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI’04, pp. 403–406. ACM, New York (2004)

  29. Sottet, J.S., Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Favre, J.M.: A model-driven engineering approach for the usability of plastic user interfaces. Engineering Interactive Systems, pp. 140–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Sottet, J.S., Calvary, G., Favre, J.M.: Models at runtime for sustaining user interface plasticity. In: Models@ run.time workshop (in conjunction with MoDELS/UML 2006 conference) (2006)

  31. Störzer, M., Hanenberg, S.: A classification of pointcut language constructs. In: Software-Engineering Properties of Languages and Aspect Technologies (2005). Held in Conjunction with AOSD’05

  32. Cerny, T., Macik, M., Donahoo, M. J., Janousek, J.: On distributed concern delivery in user interface design. Comput Sci Inform Syst 12(2), 655–681(2015)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, Grant No. SGS14/198/OHK3/3T/13.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Cerny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerny, T., Donahoo, M.J. On separation of platform-independent particles in user interfaces. Cluster Comput 18, 1215–1228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-015-0471-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-015-0471-7

Keywords

Navigation