Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of image reconstruction according to changing physical parameter

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is to determine an optimum kernel, which objectively compares and analyzes the image according to physical parameters such as FBP, which is widely used in abdominal CT, as well as SAFIRE, which was developed recently. CT images were acquired with a 20-cm-diameter cylinder phantom filled with water and a SOMATOM Definition Edge CT (Siemens Healthcare). The images were reconstructed with a 3-mm-thick kernel such as FBP, which has B10 (very smooth), B20 (smooth), B30 (medium smooth), B40 (medium), B50 (medium sharp), and SAFIRE, which has I30 (strength 1 to 5) and I40 (strength 1 to 5). SNR, PSNR, RMSE, MAE and Plot profile were measured using the image J (version 1.49q; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) in reconstructed images. In conclusion, the optimum kernel for abdominal CT should be a SAFIRE I30 kernel of strength 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siewert, B., et al.: Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 168(1), 173–178 (1997)

  2. Zeman, R.K., et al.: Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 160(4), 719–725 (1993)

  3. Gallagher, E.J., Lukens, T.W., Colussiello, S.A., Morgan, D.L., Cantrill, S.V., Campbell, M., et al.: Clinical policy: critical issues for the initial evaluation and management of patients presenting with a chief complaint of nontraumatic acute abdominal pain. Ann. Emerg. Med. 36(4), 406–415 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Korean Society of Medical Imaging Technology: TEXTBOOK of Computed Tomography. Chung-ku Publishing, p. 73 (2009)

  5. Winklehner, A., et al.: Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur. Radiol. 21(12), 2521–2526 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jang, K.J., et al.: Measurement of image quality in CT image reconstructed with different kernels. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 58(2), 334–342 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin, T.K.: Distributed Multimedia Databases: Technique and Applications. Idea Group Publishing, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man-Seok Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, MC., Han, MS., Jang, JU. et al. Evaluation of image reconstruction according to changing physical parameter. Cluster Comput 19, 931–938 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0546-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0546-0

Keywords

Navigation