Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy multi-objective and groups decision method in optimal selection of landslide treatment scheme

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several measures can be used to landslide control. Therefore, the optimal selection of landslide treatment scheme is a key problem in the landslide treatment design. This paper analyzed the key restricting factors of the landslide treatment scheme. Based on decision theory, fuzzy set theory, and case theory, the fuzzy multi-objective and lattice-ordered groups decision method were applied to solve the problem of optimal selection of landslide treatment schemes. Taking the Chaancun landslide treatment schemes as example, the theory of the limited feasible decision-making methods and the calculation process were determined. Results show that the fuzzy multi-objective and lattice-ordered groups decision method is feasible in the optimal selection of landslide treatment scheme, because this method can normalize the qualitative and quantitative indexes into quantitative indexes. Consequently the optimal selection result is highly objective. Therefore, this paper is significant to the comparison and optimization of landslide comprehensive treatment schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quan, H.-C., Lee, B.-G.: GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network in Jeju (Korea). KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 16(7), 1258–1266 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao, H.-X., Yin, K.-L.: Study on spatial prediction and time forecast of landslide. Nat. Hazards 70(3), 1735–1748 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, H.-C., Kan, Y.-C., Sung, W.-P., Hong, Y.-M.: A deep catastrophic failure model of hillslope for numerical manifold method and multiple physics computation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40(3), 735–746 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leynes, R.D., Pioquinto, W.P.C., Caranto, J.A.: Landslide hazard assessment and mitigation measures in Philippine geothermal fields. Geothermics 34, 209–221 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang, Q.-H., Wei, W., Xie, N., Zhou, C.-B.: Stability analysis and treatment of a reservoir landslide under impounding conditions: a case study. Environ. Earth Sci. 75(1), 1–12 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martens, J.: Investigation and geogrid reinforced repair of the foxridge drive landslide, Mission, Kansas. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 13(3), 255–264 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, R.L.: Case-based reasoning systems in purchasing: applications and development. J. Supply Chain Manag. 33(4), 32–39 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xie, Q.M., Ding, B.Y., Wu, D.H., Zhao, T.: Study on case-based decision support system for selection of slope treatment schemes. Rock Soil Mech. 29(5), 1351–1354 (2008). in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, Y., Wang, Q.-C.: Remediation and analysis of kinematic behaviour of a roadway landslide in the upper Minjiang River, Southwest China. Environ. Geol. 58(7), 1521–1532 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun, H.-Y., Wong, L.N.Y., Shang, Y.-Q., Shen, Y.-J., Lü, Q.: Evaluation of drainage tunnel effectiveness in landslide control. Landslides 7(4), 445–454 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, C.-D., Tang, H.-M., Hu, X.-L., Wang, L.-Q.: Numerical modelling study of the load sharing law of anti-sliding piles based on the soil arching effect for Erliban landslide, China. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17(6), 1251–1262 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonnard, C., Corominas, J.: Landslide hazard management practices in the world. Landslides 2(4), 245–246 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, S., Gao, H., Xu, D., Meng, F.: Comprehensive determination of reinforcement parameters for high cut slope based on intelligent optimization and numerical analysis. J. Earth Sci. 23, 233–242 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, X.-T., Hudson, J.A., Li, S.-J., Zhao, H.-B., Gao, W., Zhang, Y.-L.: Integrated intelligent methodology for large-scale landslide prevention design. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41(S1), 750–755 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parameshwaran, R., Srinivasan, P.S.S., Punniyamoorthy, M., Charunyanath, S.T., Ashwin, C.: Integrating fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis for performance management in automobile repair shops. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 3(4), 450–467 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, Q.-R., Tang, J.-X., Zhang, W.-Z.: Application of improved FAHP in schemes optimization about landslide treatment. J. Chongqing Univ. 33(9), 98–103 (2010). in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, M.-W., Li, L., Jin, J.-L.: Decision-making of landslide treatment schemes using identical degree of set pair analysis. CCDC 2009: 21st Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Proceedings,1-6, 757–760 (2009)

  18. Al-Homoud, A.S., Tahtamoni, W.W.: SARETL: an expert system for probabilistic displacement-based dynamic 3-D slope stability analysis and remediation of earthquake triggered landslides. Environ. Geol. 39(8), 849–874 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xia, Y.Y.: Choosing optimum control plans for unstable slopes by using of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Chin. J. Geol. Hazard Control 8(3), 1–6 (1997). in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhuyan, H.K., Kamila, N.K.: Privacy preserving sub-feature selection based on fuzzy probabilities. Clust. Comput. 17(4), 1383–1399 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu, C., Liu, S.: Beijing cultural and creative industry policy effect evaluation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation//Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS). 2015 International Conference on IEEE, pp. 1–6 (2015)

  22. Kamila, N.K., Jena, L., Bhuyan, H.K.: Pareto-based multi-objective optimization for classification in data mining. Clust. Comput. 19(4), 1723–1745 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zahariev, S.: An approach to group choice with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Set Syst. 3(22), 203–213 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Bryson, N., Mobolurin, A.: An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96(2), 379–386 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, R.-J.: Fuzzy method in group decision making. Comput. Math. Appl. 38(1), 91–101 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Hao, G., Liu, Y.-G., Zhang, D.-Y.: Fuzzy multi-objective and lattice-ordered groups decision method and the application in plan optimization. Decis. Ref., pp. 41–43 (2006, in Chinese)

  27. Xu, Y., Nie, L., Dai, S.-L., Zhang, M.: Formation and evolution of Chaancun Landslide in Dalian City, China. Adv. Mater. Res. 250–253, 1395–1399 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, M., Nie, L., Xu, Y., Dai, S.-L.: A thrust load-caused landslide triggered by excavation of the slope toe: a case study of the Chaancun Landslide in Dalian City, China. Arab. J. Geosci. 8(9), 6555–6565 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41502322), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014M551453), and Foundament Reasearch Funds of Jilin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Nie, L., Li, Z. et al. Fuzzy multi-objective and groups decision method in optimal selection of landslide treatment scheme. Cluster Comput 20, 1303–1312 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0790-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0790-y

Keywords

Navigation