Skip to main content
Log in

The metal thickness detection using pulsed eddy-current computation and detection method

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through detecting method of pulsed eddy-current (PEC) and according to thickness testing model of multi-layer metal, infer the mathematical model of eddy current testing method in single-layer metal. Use Maxwell field equations to find solutions of vector magnetic potential in its boundary conditions thus infer the impedance of hollow coil placed right above metal. Analyze the variation relationship between induced current and metal thickness in theory level. (1) Obtain three characteristic signals of induced current: altitude of current peak value (ACPV), time of reaching current peak (TRCP) and time of traversing zero point (TTZP). The thickness of the metal and the distance between the metal and coil were obtained. (2) Introduce the concept of the lift-off intersection point (LOI) and puts forward a new method of metal thickness detection based on the LOI. By analyzing the results of the experiment, it confirms the feasibility of the LOI of measurement in the metal thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fan, M., Cao, B., Sunny, A.I., et al.: Pulsed eddy current thickness measurement using phase features immune to liftoff effect. Ndt. E. Int. 86, 123–131 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshioka, S., Gotoh, Y.: Proposal of thickness measurement method of steel plate with high lift-off using pulsed magnetic field. IEEE Trans. Mag. 53, 1–4 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, W.: Thickness measurement of metal plates using swept-frequency eddy current testing and impedance normalization. IEEE Sens. J. 17(14), 4558–4569 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, G., Xia, R., Chen, Y., et al.: Research on double coil pulse eddy current thickness measurement. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation. pp. 406–409 (2017)

  5. Azaman, K.N., Sophian, A., Nafiah, F.: Effects of coil diameter in thickness measurement using pulsed eddy current non-destructive testing. Mater. Sci. Eng. 260(1), 012001 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu, Y., Lei, M., Li, Z., et al.: Lift-off effect reduction based on the dynamic trajectories of the received-signal fast Fourier transform in pulsed eddy current testing. NDT E Int. 87, 85–92 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan, M., Cao, B., Tian, G., et al.: Thickness measurement using liftoff point of intersection in pulsed eddy current responses for elimination of liftoff effect. Sens. Actuators A 251, 66–74 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, W., Wang, H., Feng, Z.: Non-contact online thickness measurement system for metal films based on eddy current sensing with distance tracking technique. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87(4), 045005 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Angani, C.S., Ramos, H.G., Ribeiro, A.L., et al.: Lift-off point of intersection feature in transient eddy-current oscillations method to detect thickness variation in stainless steel. IEEE Trans. Magn. 52(6), 1–8 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Angani, C.S., Ramos, H.G., Ribeiro, A.L., et al.: Evaluation of transient eddy current oscillations response for thickness measurement of stainless steel plate. Measurement 90(1), 59–63 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, J., Wu, X., Zhang, Q., et al.: Measurement of lift-off using the relative variation of magnetic flux in pulsed eddy current testing. NDT E Int. 75, 57–64 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shokralla, S., Sullivan, S., Morelli, J., et al.: Modelling and validation of Eddy current response to changes in factors affecting pressure tube to calandria tube gap measurement. NDT E Int. 73, 15–21 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuedong, W.U., Huang, C., Xiong, B., et al.: Compensation method of sensor lift-off effect to thickness measurement of pulsed eddy current. Ship Electr. Eng., 2015

  14. Angani, C.S., Ramos, H.G., Ribeiro, A.L., et al.: Transient eddy current oscillations method for the inspection of thickness change in stainless steel[J]. Sens. Actuators A 233, 217–223 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, C., Wu, X.: Probe lift-off compensation method for pulsed eddy current thickness measurement. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on IEEE Antennas and Propagation. pp. 937–939 (2014)

  16. Gang, Z., Ding, L., Zhen, Z., et al.: Research on thickness measurement based on lift-off intersection of pulsed eddy current. Chin. J. Sci. Instr. 29(8), 1745–1749 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lefebvre, J.H.V.: Mandache C. Pulsed eddy current measurement of lift-off. In: Proceedings of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. American Institute of Physics, pp. 669–676 (2006)

  18. Luquire, J.W., Deeds, W.E., Dodd, C.V.: Alternating current distribution between planar conductors. J. Appl. Phys. 41(10), 3983–3991 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng, C.C., Dodd, C.V., Deeds, W.E.: General analysis of probe coils near stratified conductors. Int. J. Nondestr. Test. 3, 109–130 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deeds, W.E., Dodd, C.V.: Analytical solutions to eddy-current probe-coil problems. J. Appl. Phys. 39(6), 2829–2838 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, X.: Time-domain analytic expressions for pulsed eddy current field of conductive plate and characteristic quantity for thickness measurement. Trans. China Electr. Soc. 28(7), 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Danon, Y., Lee, C., Mulligan, C., et al.: Characterizing tantalum sputtered coatings on steel by using eddy currents. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40(4), 1826–1832 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuboi, H., Seshima, N., Sebestyen, I., et al.: Transient eddy current analysis of pulsed eddy current testing by finite element method. Magn. IEEE Trans. 40(2), 1330–1333 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bowler, J., Johnson, M.: Pulsed eddy-current response to a conducting half-space. IEEE Trans. Magn. 33(3), 2258–2264 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sophian, A., Gui, Y.T., Taylor, D., et al.: Design of a pulsed eddy current sensor for detection of defects in aircraft lap-joints[J]. Sens. Actuators A 101(1–2), 92–98 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tai, C.C., Rose, J.H., Moulder, J.C.: Thickness and conductivity of metallic layers from pulsed eddy-current measurements. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67(11), 3965–3972 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51478383, 5120916, 51678470), National Program on Key Research SUB-Project (Grant No. 2017YFC0704207-03), Youth Science and Technology Project of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2016KJXX-64), Science and technology project of Xi’an (Grant No. JKDZ0011), Science and technology project of Xi’an BEI LIN (Grant No. GX1705).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong-Xing Duan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Li, CJ., Duan, ZX. et al. The metal thickness detection using pulsed eddy-current computation and detection method. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 3), 6551–6562 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2335-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2335-4

Keywords

Navigation