Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Product pricing considering the consumer preference based on Internet of Things

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid development of information technology, Internet of things is rapidly penetrated into the manufacturing industry, some manufacturers began to adopt the Internet of things technology to produce intelligent products. Focusing on the pricing of products in the home market under the Internet of things technology environment, the network effect and technological innovation are introduced in the condition that consumers’ preferences are evenly distributed and a pricing game model which can reflect the relationship among manufacturers are constructed. On this basis, the optimal subsidy rate of government is designed based on the principle of social welfare maximization. The results show that, with the advantage of low price of ordinary products, the manufacturer 1 (the ordinary household product manufacturer) can also obtain the corresponding market share. The network effect and the degree of product innovation are the important influencing factors for the manufacturer 2 (the intelligent household product manufacturer) to gain the competitive advantage. Increasing the subsidy rate can effectively stimulate the manufacturer 2 to carry out technological innovation, but it will lead to the decline of the total social welfare level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao, D.Z., Pan, X.Y., Wu, C.X.: Issues and implications of supply chain management based on internet of things. Mod. Manag. 36(1), 118–120 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pigou, A.C.: The Economics of Walfare, pp. 25–40. Macmillian, London (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hurkens, S., López, Á.L.: Mobile termination, network externalities and consumer expectations. Econ. J. 124(579), 1005–1039 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, X.Z., Wang, Y.: Study on the synergic development mechanism and evaluation of synergic degree of the internet of things industry in china. Soft Sci. 01, 42–46 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ding, M., Ross Jr., W.T., Rao, V.R.: Price as an indicator of quality: implications for utility and demand functions. J. Retail. 86(1), 69–84 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao, Y.B., Wu, P., Wang, Y.L.: Pricing strategies for fresh products with multiple quality levels based on customer choice behavior. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 18(1), 58–63 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mussa, M., Rosen, S.: Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory 18(2), 301–317 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu, Y., Wenzel, T.: Transparency, price-dependent demand and product variety. Econ. Lett. 110(3), 216–219 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, D.Z., Yuan, B.Y., Xu, C.Q.: Product line pricing based on the unknown consumer low-carbon preference. Syst. Eng. 32(1), 77–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, J.: Do public policies support firm’s innovation—a comparative analysis on the subsidies and tax credit. Sci. Res. Manag. 32(4), 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levén, P., Holmström, J., Mathiassen, L.: Managing research and innovation networks: evidence from a government sponsored cross-industry program. Res. Policy 43(1), 156–168 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arias, A.D., van Beers, C.: Energy subsidies, structure of electricity prices and technological change of energy use. Energy Econ. 40, 495–502 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, G.: From mercantile strategy to domestic demand stimulation: changes in China’s solar PV subsidies. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 21(1), 96–112 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoernig, S.: Strategic delegation under price competition and network effects. Econ. Lett. 117(2), 487–489 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Asioli, D., Næs, T., Granli, B.S., et al.: Consumer preferences for iced coffee determined by conjoint analysis: an exploratory study with Norwegian consumers. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49(6), 1565–1571 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kobayashi, S.: On a dynamic model of cooperative and noncooperative R and D in oligopoly with spillovers. Dyn. Games Appl. 5(4), 599–619 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hotelling: Stability in competition. J. Econ. 39(1), 41–57 (1929)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazalov, V., Sakaguchi, M.: Location game on the plane. Int. Game Theory Rev. 5(01), 13–25 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, C.H.: Spatial Cournot competition in a linear city with directional delivery constraints. Jpn. Econ. Rev. 65(3), 344–374 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Humanities and Social Science Project of Hebei education department (No. ZD201721).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-xia Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Xy., Ma, Jz. & Wu, Cx. Product pricing considering the consumer preference based on Internet of Things. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 6), 15379–15385 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2601-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2601-5

Keywords

Navigation