1 Correction to: Cluster Computing https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03253-z

After Online Publication of the article [1] the authors noticed error in the labels of part Figures 12 to 24 and replaced the figures with revised version. Correct Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24 are listed below

Fig. 12
figure 12

Average response time. a Overload = 20%. b Overload = 60%. c Overload = 80%

Full size image
Fig. 13
figure 13

Processed application rate. a Overload = 20%. b Overload = 60%. c Overload = 80%

Full size image
Fig. 14
figure 14

Profit. a Overload = 20%. b Overload = 80%

Full size image
Fig. 15
figure 15

Average response time. a Number of VM types = 2. b Number of VM types = 8

Full size image
Fig. 16
figure 16

Processed application rate. a Number of VM types = 2. b Number of VM types = 8

Full size image
Fig. 17
figure 17

Profit. a Number of VM types = 2. b Number of VM types = 8

Full size image
Fig. 18
figure 18

Manager cloud (Cloud 1). a Average response time. b Processed application rate. c Profit

Full size image
Fig. 19
figure 19

Average response time (number of requested federations = 2, 5, 7)

Full size image
Fig. 20
figure 20

Processed applications rate. a Number of requested federations = 2. b Number of requested federations = 5. c Number of requested federations = 7

Full size image
Fig. 21
figure 21

Profit. a Number of requested federations = 2. b Number of requested federations = 5. c Number of requested federations = 7

Full size image
Fig. 22
figure 22

Total profit of the cloud federation

Full size image
Fig. 23
figure 23

Average size of the cloud federation

Full size image
Fig. 24
figure 24

Average execution time of the cloud federation formation mechanism

Full size image