Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge management in semantic social networks

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An object-oriented model of semantic social networks is proposed and formally analyzed. Methods for project, role, and team management based on the semantic model are defined and implemented in \(\mathfrak{n}\mathfrak{i}\mathbf{K}\mathfrak{l}\mathfrak{a}\mathfrak{s}\), a semantic wiki language based on frame logic developed by the author. The new approach to semantic social networks allows dynamic change of social network semantics and the establishment of the well known fishnet organization in a social network. In the end possible applications to knowledge management are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please refer to Tredinnick (2006) for a good review.

  2. It should be stated here that teams or subgroups can be organized by any imaginable set of properties, not only skills and knowledge.

  3. Here by |X| we mean the adjacency matrix of graph X.

  4. Organizational units can in this context be either individuals, teams, departments, divisions and even entire organizations or groups of organizations by the fractal organization principle (Žugaj and Schatten 2005, pp. 149–151).

  5. The schema (defined or inferred) is used in ⊺a OP is for input suggestion mechanisms. Such mechanisms try to minimize syntactic errors due to different user input. For a better understanding of such input mechanisms please refer to Schatten et al. (2009a).

  6. There are off course other approaches like sociometrics.

  7. See (Wasserman and Faust 1994) for an in depth discussion of such metrics.

  8. Unified Modeling Language.

  9. In ⊺a OP is not only people can be tagged but various other objects like wiki pages as well. You can imagine the role object as a wiki page (or any other resource) tagged with the adequate attribute-value tags.

  10. Please refer to Schatten et al. (2009b) or http://autopoiesis.foi.hr/wiki.php?name=TOP%20Support&page=Niklas for an outline of \(\mathfrak{n}\mathfrak{i}\mathbf{K}\mathfrak{l}\mathfrak{a}\mathfrak{s}\) syntax.

  11. a OP is allows \(\mathcal{F}\) lora-2 and OWL ontology export.

  12. The benchmark data as well as data generation and testing tools’ source code is available at autopoiesis.foi.hr/benchmark/benchmark.tar.gz.

References

  • Aleman-Meza B, Nagarajan M, Ramakrishnan C, Ding L, Kolari P, Sheth AP, Arpinar IB, Joshi A, Finin T (2006) Semantic analytics on social networks: experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 407–416

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am Magazine 284:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to clique identification. J Math Soc 2:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin JG, Decker S (2007) The future of social networks on the internet: the need for semantics. Internet Comput 11(6):86–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley D, Miller L (2000) Foaf. Available at http://www.foaf-project.org/. Accessed 20th July 2010

  • Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Computer networks and ISDN systems, pp 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantador I, Castells P (2006) Multilayered semantic social network modeling by ontology-based user profiles clustering: application to collaborative filtering. In: Managing knowledge in a world of networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 334–349

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carley K (2002) Smart agents and organizations of the future. In: Lievrouw L, Livingstone S (eds) The handbook of new media. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 206–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley K (2003) Dynamic network analysis. In: Breiger R, Carley K, Pattison P (eds) Summary of the NRC workshop on social network modeling and analysis. Committee on Human Factors, National Research Council, pp 133–145

  • Downes S (2005) Semantic networks and social networks. Learn Organ 12(5):411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finin T, Ding L, Zhou L, Joshi A (2005) Social networking on the semantic web. Learn Organ 12(5):418–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gloor P, Zhao Y (2006) Analyzing actors and their discussion topics by semantic social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information visualization, pp 130–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck J, Parsia B, Hendler J (2003) Trust networks on the semantic web. In: Cooperative information agents, vol VII. Springer, Berlin, pp 238–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen R, Swigart R (2000) Upsizing the individual in the downsized corporation managing in the wake of reengineering, globalization, and overwhelming technological change. Perseus

  • Jones PM (2001) Collaborative knowledge management, social networks, and organizational learning. In: Smith MJ, Salvendy G (eds) Social and internationalization design aspects of human-computer interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 306–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung JJ, Euzenat J (2007) Towards semantic social networks. In: Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4519. Springer, Berlin, pp 267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Kifer M, Lausen G, Wu J (1995) Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. J Assoc Comput Mach 42:741–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D, Carley K (1998) A PCANS model of structure in organization. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on command and control, research and technology evidence based research, Vienna, VA, pp 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleković M, Schatten M (2008) Leadership in team based knowledge management—an autopoietic information system’s perspective. In: Aurer B, Baca M (eds) 19th central European conference on information and intelligent systems (CECIIS2008) conference proceedings, Faculty of Organization and Informatics, pp 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Odell JJ (1998) Object-oriented methods: a foundation, uml edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mika P (2005) Flink: semantic web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. J Web Semant 3(2–3):211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mika P (2007) Ontologies are us: a unified model of social networks and semantics. J Web Semant 5(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Prothmann T, Finke I (2004) Selakt—social network analysis as a method for expert localisation and sustainable knowledge transfer. J Univers Comput Sci 10(6):691–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (1873) Über Wahrheit und Lüge im außermoralischen Sinn. Unpublished. Available at http://www.textlog.de/455.html, accessed: 21st April 2008

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company, how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oversity (2004) Citeulike. Available at http://www.citeulike.org. Accessed 9th October 2010

  • Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web

  • Reihlen M, Rohde A (2002) Das heterarchische Unternehmen: Ein flexibiles Organisationsmodell im wissensbasierten Wettbewerb. Z Lern Organ 8:30–34. http://www.uni-koeln.de/wiso-fak/planung/veroeff/reihzfo02.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter J (2003) Delicious. Available at http://www.delicious.com. Accessed 9th October 2010

  • Schatten M, Žugaj M (2007) Organizing a fishnet structure. In: 29th international conference information technology interfaces proceedings, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, p 81–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schatten M, Čubrilo M, Ševa J (2008) A semantic wiki system based on F-logic. In: Aurer B, Bača M (eds) 19th central European conference on information and intelligent systems (CECIIS2008) conference proceedings. Faculty of Organization and Informatics, pp 57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten M, Maleković M, Rabuzin K (2009a) Inconsistencies in semantic social web applications. In: Aurer B, Bača M, Rabuzin K (eds) Proceedings of the 20th central European conference on information and intelligent systems (CECIIS2009). Faculty of Organization and Informatics, pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten M, Čubrilo M, Ševa J (2009b) Dynamic queries in semantic wiki systems. In: Aurer B, Bača M (eds) Proceedings of the 20th central European conference on information and intelligent systems (CECIIS2009). Faculty of Organization and Informatics, pp 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten M, Kakulapati V, Čubrilo M (2010) Reasoning about social semantic web applications using string similarity and frame logic. In: Aurer B, Bača M, Schatten M (eds) Proceedings of the 21st central European conference on information and intelligent systems (CECIIS2010). Faculty of Organization and Informatics, pp 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredinnick L (2006) Web 2.0 and business. Bus Inf Rev 23(4):228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Kortzfleisch HFO, Mergel I, Proll C (2007) Potentials of social networks for knowledge management with regard to the development of stable competences and dynamic capabilities—conceptualization and case study results. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Štritof T, Schatten M (2010) Visual knowledge discovery on semantic wikis. In: Aurer B, Bača M, Schatten M (eds) Proceedings of the 21st central European conference on information and intelligent systems (CECIIS2010). Faculty of Organization and Informatics, pp 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Žugaj M, Schatten M (2005) Arhitektura suvremenih organizacija. Tonimir and Faculty of Organization and Informatics, Varaždinske Toplice, Croatia

  • Žugaj M, Schatten M (2007) Otvorena ontologija organizacijske arhitekture u funkciji upravljanja znanjem. Ekon Vjesn XX(1–2):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Žugaj M, Schatten M (2008) Informacijski sustav za upravljanje znanjem u hipertekst organizaciji. Ekon Vjesn 21(1–2):19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Žugaj M, Schatten M (2009) Poduzeçe 2.0 kao temelj za pramac/krma organizaciju i upravljanje znanjem. Ekon Vjesn 22(1):103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis; methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Kifer M, Zhao C (2003) Flora-2: a rule-based knowledge representation and inference infrastructure for the semantic web. In: Second international conference on ontologies, databases and applications of semantics (ODBASE) proceedings, Catania, Sicily, Italy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Schatten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schatten, M. Knowledge management in semantic social networks. Comput Math Organ Theory 19, 538–568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9141-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9141-y

Keywords

Navigation