Skip to main content
Log in

Double-Regularization Proximal Methods, with Complementarity Applications

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the variational inequality problem formed by a general set-valued maximal monotone operator and a possibly unbounded “box” in \({{\mathbb R}^n}\), and study its solution by proximal methods whose distance regularizations are coercive over the box. We prove convergence for a class of double regularizations generalizing a previously-proposed class of Auslender et al. Using these results, we derive a broadened class of augmented Lagrangian methods. We point out some connections between these methods and earlier work on “pure penalty” smoothing methods for complementarity; this connection leads to a new form of augmented Lagrangian based on the “neural” smoothing function. Finally, we computationally compare this new kind of augmented Lagrangian to three previously-known varieties on the MCPLIB problem library, and show that the neural approach offers some advantages. In these tests, we also consider primal-dual approaches that include a primal proximal term. Such a stabilizing term tends to slow down the algorithms, but makes them more robust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Attouch and M. Théra, “A general duality principle for the sum of two operators,” Journal of Convex Analysis, vol. 3, pp. 1–24, 1996.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Auslender, M. Teboulle, and S. Ben-Tiba, “A logarithmic-quadratic proximal method for variational inequalities,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 12, pp. 31–40, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Auslender, M. Teboulle, and S. Ben-Tiba, “Interior proximal and multiplier methods based on second order homogeneous kernels,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 24, pp. 645–668, 1999.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Auslender and M. Teboulle, “Lagrangian duality and related multiplier methods for variational inequality problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 10, pp. 1097–1115, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D.P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientific, 1995.

  6. R. Burachick, M.G. Drummond, A.N. Iusem, and B.F. Svaiter, “Full convergence of the steepest descent method with inexact line searches,” Optimization, vol. 10, pp. 1196–1211, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.V. Burke and M.C. Ferris, “Weak sharp minima in mathematical programming,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 31, pp. 1340–1356, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Censor and S.A. Zenios, “Proximal minimization algorithm with D-functions,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 73, pp. 451–464, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Censor, A.N. Iusem, and S.A. Zenios, “An interior point method with Bregman functions for the variational inequality problem with paramonotone operators,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 81, pp. 373–400, 1998.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Chen and O.L. Mangasarian, “A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 5, pp. 97–138, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. S.P. Dirkse and M.C. Ferris, “MCPLIB: A collection on nonlinear mixed complementarity problems,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 2, pp. 319–345, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.P. Dirkse and M.C. Ferris, “Modeling and solution environments for MPEC: GAMS & MATLAB,” in Reformulation: Nonsmooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods (Lausanne, 1997), Applied Optimization, vol. 22. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 1999, pp. 127–147.

  13. E.D. Dolan and J.J. Moré, Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles, Mathematical Programming, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 201–213, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Eckstein, “Nonlinear proximal point algorithms using Bregman functions, with applications to convex programming,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 18, pp. 202–226, 1993.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Eckstein, “Approximate iterations in Bregman-function-based proximal algorithms,” Mathematical programming, vol. 83, pp. 113–123, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Eckstein and M.C. Ferris, “Smooth methods of multipliers for complementarity problems,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 86, pp. 65–90, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M.C. Ferris, “Finite termination of the proximal point algorithm,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 50, pp. 359–366, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. P.E. Gill, W. Murray, and M.H. Wright, Practical Optimization. Academic Press, 1981.

  19. A.N. Iusem, “On some properties of paramonotone operators,” Journal of Convex Analysis, vol. 5, pp. 269–278, 1998.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. C.T. Kelley, Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations. SIAM: Philadelphia, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.C. Kiwiel, “On the twice differentiable cubic augmented Lagrangian,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 88, pp. 233–236, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Lewin (Ed.) Structural Properties of Polylogarithms. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 37, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1991.

  23. U. Mosco, “Dual variational inequalities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 40, pp. 202–206, 1972.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. D.J. Newman, A Problem Seminar. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R.A. Polyak, “Nonlinear rescaling vs. smoothing techinique in convex optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 92, pp. 197–235, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. S.M. Robinson, “Composition duality and maximal monotonicity,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 85, pp. 1–13, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. R.T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.T. Rockafellar, “Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 14, pp. 877–898, 1976.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. R.T. Rockafellar, “Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 1, pp. 97–116, 1976.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. R.T. Rockafellar and R.J.-B. Wets, Variational Analysis. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P.J.S. Silva, J. Eckstein, and C. Humes Jr., “Rescaling and stepsize selection in proximal methods using separable generalized distances,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 12, pp. 238–261, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Teboulle, “Entropic proximal mappings with applications to nonlinear programming,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 17, pp. 670–690, 1992.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Tseng and D. Bertsekas, “On the convergence of the exponential multiplier method for convex programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 60, pp. 1–19, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. A.E. Xavier, Hyperbolic Penalty: A New Method for Solving Optimization Problems,” M.Sc. Thesis, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (in Portuguese), 1982.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo J. S. Silva.

Additional information

This author was partially supported by CNPq, Grant PQ 304133/2004-3 and PRONEX-Optimization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, P.J.S., Eckstein, J. Double-Regularization Proximal Methods, with Complementarity Applications. Comput Optim Applic 33, 115–156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-005-3065-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-005-3065-0

Keywords

Navigation