Skip to main content
Log in

Grid Restrained Nelder-Mead Algorithm

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probably the most popular algorithm for unconstrained minimization for problems of moderate dimension is the Nelder-Mead algorithm published in 1965. Despite its age only limited convergence results exist. Several counterexamples can be found in the literature for which the algorithm performs badly or even fails. A convergent variant derived from the original Nelder-Mead algorithm is presented. The proposed algorithm's convergence is based on the principle of grid restrainment and therefore does not require sufficient descent as the recent convergent variant proposed by Price, Coope, and Byatt. Convergence properties of the proposed grid-restrained algorithm are analysed. Results of numerical testing are also included and compared to the results of the algorithm proposed by Price et al. The results clearly demonstrate that the proposed grid-restrained algorithm is an efficient direct search method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Byatt, “A convergent variant of the Nelder-Mead algorithm,” Master’;s thesis, Mathematics and Statistics Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ, 2000.

  2. I.D. Coope and C.J. Price, “Frame based methods for unconstrained optimization,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 107, pp. 261–274, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. I.D. Coope and C.J. Price, “On the convergence of grid-based methods for unconstrained optimization,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 11, pp. 859–869, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Davis, “Theory of positive linear dependence,” American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 76, pp. 733–746, 1954.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. C.T. Kelley, “Detection and remediation of stagnation in the Nelder-Mead algorithm using a sufficient decrease condition,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 10, pp. 43–55, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J.C. Lagarias, “Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 9, pp. 112–147, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R.M. Lewis and V.J. Torczon, “Rank ordering and positive bases in pattern search algorithms,” ICASE NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-0001, USA, Tech. Report 96-71, 1996.

  8. R.M. Lewis, V.J. Torczon, and M.W. Trosset, “Direct search methods: Then and now,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 124, pp. 191–207, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. K.I.M. McKinnon, “Convergence of the Nelder-Mead simplex method,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 9, pp. 148–158, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J.J. Moré, B.S. Garbow, and K.E. Hillstrom, “Testing unconstrained optimization software,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 7, pp. 17–41, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A simplex method for function minimization,” The Computer Journal, vol. 7, pp. 308–313, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.J. Price, I.D. Coope, and D. Byatt, “A convergent variant of the Nelder-Mead algorithm,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 113, pp. 5–19, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A.S. Rykov, “Simplex algorithms for unconstrained minimization,” Problems of Control and Information Theory, vol. 12, pp. 195–208, 1983.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. V.J. Torczon, “Multi-directional search: A direct search algorithm for parallel machines,” PhD thesis, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA, 1989.

  15. V.J. Torczon, “On the convergence of pattern search methods,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 7, pp. 1–25, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Tseng, “Fortified-descent simplical search method: A general approach,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 10, pp. 269–288, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M.H. Wright, “Direct search methods: Once scorned, now respectable,” in Proceedings of the 1995 Dundee Biennial Conference in Numerical Analysis, Dundee, UK, 1996, pp. 191–208.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Árpád Bűrmen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bűrmen, Á., Puhan, J. & Tuma, T. Grid Restrained Nelder-Mead Algorithm. Comput Optim Applic 34, 359–375 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-005-3912-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-005-3912-z

Keywords

Navigation