Skip to main content
Log in

Two complexity results on c-optimality in experimental design

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding a c-optimal design of a regression model is a basic optimization problem in statistics. We study the computational complexity of the problem in the case of a finite experimental domain. We formulate a decision version of the problem and prove its \(\boldsymbol{\mathit{NP}}\)-completeness. We provide examples of computationally complex instances of the design problem, motivated by cryptography. The problem, being \(\boldsymbol{\mathit{NP}}\)-complete, is then relaxed; we prove that a decision version of the relaxation, called approximate c-optimality, is P-complete. We derive an equivalence theorem for linear programming: we show that the relaxed c-optimality is equivalent (in the sense of many-one LOGSPACE-reducibility) to general linear programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal, M., Kayal, N., Saxena, N.: PRIMES is in P. Ann. Math. 160, 781–793 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, A., Donev, A., Tobias, R.: Optimum Experimental Designs with SAS. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobkin, D., Lipton, R., Reiss, S.: Linear programming is log-space hard for P. Inf. Process. Lett. 8(2), 96–97 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenlaw, R., Hoover, H., Ruzzo, W.: Limits to Parallel Computation. P-completeness Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Harman, R., Jurík, T.: Computing c-optimal experimental designs using the simplex method of linear programming. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, 247–254 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Khachyian, L.: A polynomial algorithm for linear programming. Dokl. Soviet Acad. Sci. 244(5), 1093–1096 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Papadimitriou, C.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Longman (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pázman, A.: Foundations of Optimum Experimental Design. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pukelsheim, F., Rieder, S.: Efficient rounding in approximate designs. Biometrika 79, 763–770 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrijver, A.: Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. Wiley, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Černý.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Černý, M., Hladík, M. Two complexity results on c-optimality in experimental design. Comput Optim Appl 51, 1397–1408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-010-9377-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-010-9377-8

Keywords

Navigation