Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

COAP 2014 Best Paper Prize

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bertsimas, D., Brown, D.: Constructing uncertainty sets for robust linear optimization. Oper. Res. 57, 1483–1495 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bienstock, D., Zuckerberg, M.: Solving lp relaxations of large-scale precedence constrained problems. In: Eisenbrand, F., Shepherd, F. (eds.) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, vol. 6080. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1–14. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Espinoza, D., Moreno, E.: A primal-dual aggregation algorithm for minimizing conditional value-at-risk in linear programs. Comput. Optim. Appl. 59, 617–638 (2014)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Goycoolea, M., Espinoza, D., Moreno, E., Rivera, O.: Comparing new and traditional methodologies for production scheduling in open pit mining. In: Proceedings of APCOM 2015—Applications of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry, pp. 352–359. Society for mining, metallurgy & exploration, Inc., Newman (2015)

  5. Kleywegt, A., Shapiro, A., Homem-de Mello, T.: The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 479–502 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Künzi-Bay, A., Mayer, J.: Computational aspects of minimizing conditional value-at-risk. Comput. Manag. Sci. 3, 3–27 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagos, G., Espinoza, D., Moreno, E., Vielma, J.P.: Restricted risk measures and robust optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241, 771–782 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Linderoth, J., Shapiro, A., Wright, S.: The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming. Ann. Oper. Res. 142, 215–241 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Natarajan, K., Pachamanova, D., Sim, M.: Constructing risk measures from uncertainty sets. Oper. Res. 57, 1129–1141 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 21–41 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Bank. Financ. 26, 1443–1471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song, Y., Luedtke, J.: An adaptive partition-based approach for solving two-stage stochastic programs with fixed recourse. SIAM J. Optim. 25, 1344–1367 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

COAP 2014 Best Paper Prize. Comput Optim Appl 62, 609–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-015-9807-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-015-9807-8

Search

Navigation