Skip to main content
Log in

Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the occurrence of social loafing in technology-supported teams along with methods for diminishing loafing. A controlled laboratory experiment with a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial design is used. The independent variables – feedback, anonymity, and group size – are manipulated experimentally. It was expected that social loafing – a widely observed phenomenon – would indeed occur in technology supported teams. It was also expected that the traditional means of reducing social loafing (i.e., identifiability and feedback) within physical work environments would also have similar effects within technology-supported work environments. As expected, social loafing is found to occur in teams operating in a technology-driven realm. An unexpected finding is that social loafing is measurable only when participants are provided self-feedback. While other forms of feedback have a positive influence on productivity, they fail to reduce this phenomenon, and identifiability of group members is found to have no observable effect on social loafing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, Robert (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidambaram, L. and L.L. Tung (2005): Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Information Systems Research, vol. 16(1), pp. 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., J.S. Valacich and J.F. Nunamaker (1990): An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Group Size in an Electronic Meeting Environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, vol. 20(5), pp. 1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., J.F. Nunamaker and D.R. Vogel (1991): A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 7(2), pp. 107–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, Christopher P. (1989): Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 34, pp. 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallupe, R.B., A.R. Dennis, W.H. Cooper, J.S. Valacich, L.M. Bastianutti and J.F. Nunamaker (1992): Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size. The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 35(2), pp. 350–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Stan (2001): Counterpoints: Notes on OD for the 21st Century – Part ii. Organization Development Journal, vol. 19(1), pp. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Roger G. (1993): Overcoming Social Loafing Through Goal Setting and Feedback. New York: Hofstra University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, A.G., G. Levinger, J. Graves and V. Peckham (1974): The Ringelmann Effect: Studies of Group Size and Group Performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 10(4), pp. 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L.M., T. Connolly and J. Galegher (1990): The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task. MIS Quarterly, vol. 14(3), pp. 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L.M. and D.A. Tansik (1991): Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group. Decision Sciences, vol. 22(2), pp. 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karau, S.J. and K.D. Williams (1993): Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 65(4), pp. 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, Geoffrey (1982): Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook (2nd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert E. (2003): Applying Social Psychological Theory to the Problems of Group Work. In J. Carroll (ed): HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward A Multidisciplinary Science., New York: Morgan Kaufman, pp. 325–356.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., K.D. Williams and S.G. Harkins (1979): Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 37(6), pp. 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., T. Shea and T.M. Daley (2005): The Effect of Virtual Team Membership on Attitudes Towards Technology Usage: A Study of Student Attitudes in the United States. International Journal of Management, vol. 22(1), pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. and G.P. Latham (1990): A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moede, W. (1927): Die richtlinien der leistungs-psychologie. Industrielle Psychotechnik, vol. 4, pp. 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M.H. Kutner (1985): Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs (3rd ed). Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J.F., A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel and J.F. George (1991): Electronic Meeting Systems. Communications of the ACM, vol. 34(7), pp. 40–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara-Devereaux, M. and R. Johansen (1994): Global Work: Bridging Distance, Culture and Time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pissara, Jo. and Jorge C. Jesuino (2005): Idea Generation Through Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 20(3/4), pp. 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, M.M., R.O. Briggs, B.A. Reinig and J. Yen (1996): Social Loafing in Electronic Brainstorming: Invoking Social Comparison Through Technology and Facilitation Techniques to Improve Group Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 12(3), pp. 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Ivan D. (1972): Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, Kate and Stephen G. Harkins (1987): Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 53(5), pp. 891–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, Kate and Stephen G. Harkins (1993): The Effect of Experimenter Evaluation on Self-Evaluation Within the Social Loafing Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, K., J. Garczynski and S. Harkins (2000): The Contribution of the Potential for Evaluation to Coactions Effects. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 3(3), pp. 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J.S., L.M. Jessup, A.R. Dennis and J.F. Nunamaker (1992): A Conceptual Framework of Anonymity in Group Support Systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 1, pp. 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoll, Alan A. (1969): Dynamic Management Education. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Suleiman.

Additional information

Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suleiman, J., Watson, R.T. Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams. Comput Supported Coop Work 17, 291–309 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-008-9075-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-008-9075-6

Key words

Navigation