Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration and Generification—Agile Software Development in the Healthcare Market

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to strategies applicable to vendors who want to move their locally designed and highly integrated systems to a larger market. A further aim is to explore how such systems developed for a local practice, and tightly integrated with the existing infrastructure, can be adapted to a larger market. We analyse the socio-technical mechanisms in play, the roles that the vendor and the users have in order to facilitate this, and the delicate interplay in relation to the other vendors. The analysis draws on the CSCW field, notions of generification of packaged software products, and boundary work. We argue that this process involves boundary work in relation to the installed base, as well as to other vendors and users. We also argue that the roles of the actors involved change during this process. The case described in this paper is the evolution of a system in which general practitioners can order laboratory services from the hospital electronically. The system integrates the general practitioners’ information systems with the laboratory information system in the hospital. The development of the system started out in close cooperation with one customer, but as it evolved more customers bought the system. The system has been designed in an iterative and evolutionary way using agile development methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashkenas, R. N., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., & Kerr, S. (1995). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. (1998). Computer supported collaborative working: Challenging perspectives on work and technology. In R.D. Galliers and W.R.J. Bates (eds.), Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: Innovation for the 21st Century Organization. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • Barrett, M, Oborn, E, Orlikowski, W, Yates, J. (2007). Boundary relations: Technological objects and the restructuring of workplace boundaries. Working Paper Series 16/2007. Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.

  • Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained. embrace change. Addison-Wesley.

  • Beck, K, Highsmith, J, Schwaber, Fowler, M., Cockburn, A, Martin, R, et al. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Retrieved July 01, 2008, from http://www.agilemanifesto.org/

  • Berg, M. (1998). Accumulating and coordinating: Occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. (1999). Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55, 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R. J., & Tenkasi, R. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burri, R. (2008). Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (1995). Development and structure of the international software industry, 1950–1990. Business and Economic History, vol.24. no.2.

  • Carstensen, P., & Sørensen, C. (1996). From the social to the systematic. Mechanisms supporting coordination in design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The journal of Collaborative Computing, 6(4), 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. USA: Ernest & Young.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, E., & Wagner, I. (1993). Negotiating temporal orders: The case of collaborative time management in a surgery clinic. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen, G., & Monteiro, E. (2003). A patchwork planet: Integration and cooperation in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 12, 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen, G., & Monteiro, E. (2007). Seamless integration: Standardisation across multiple local settings. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(5–6), 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Lundberg, N. (2001). Designing work oriented infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Vos, A., Buscher, M., Rouncefield, M., et al. (2002). Co-realisation. Towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, T. (2004). Studying composite boundaries: A framework of analysis. Human Relations, 57(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, L, Ellingsen, G. (2008). Lightweight methods in heavyweight organisations. Proceeding of the Participatory Design Conference . ACM International Conference series.

  • Keil, M., & Carmel, E. (1995). Customer-developer links in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38(5), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerosuo, H. (2004). Examining boundaries in health care—outline of a method for studying organizational boundaries in interaction. Outlines, 1, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2007). Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 307–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health and Care Services. (2006). National health plan for Norway (2007–2010). http://www.regjeringen.no/Upload/HOD/Vedlegg/Engelsk/National%20Health%20Plan.pdf.

  • Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2008). Software and organisations. Teeside: Routledge Studies in Technology, Work and Organisations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, N., Williams, R., & D’Adderio, L. (2007). Global software and its provenance: Generification work in the production of organizational software packages. Social Studies of Science, 37(2), 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, N, Williams, R, Procter, R. (2003). Fitting standard software packages to non-standard organizations: The ‘Biography’ of an enterprise-wide system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol.15, no.3.

  • Rittenbruch, M, McEwan, G, Ward, N, Mansfield, T, Bartenstein, D. (2002). Extreme participation—moving extreme programming towards participatory design. PDC 02- Participatory Design Conference. Malmø, Sweden

  • Rolland, K., & Monteiro, E. (2002). Balancing the local and the global in infrastructural information systems. The Information Society, 18, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay S, Monteiro, E, Aanestad, M. (2009). Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health eInfrastructures in India. Journal of the AIS, Accepted for publication.

  • Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., Wagner, I., & Tolar, M. (2007). Permutations of cooperative work practices: A study of two oncology clinics. Sanibel Island: Group’07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with scrum. Washington: Microsoft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2007) Cultivating the 'Generic Solution'—the emergence of a chinese Product Data Management (PDM) Software Package. PhD-thesis, University of Edinburgh, http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2023.

  • Aanestad, M. (2002). Cultivating networks: Implementating surgical telemedicine. Dr.Scient Thesis. Oslo: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Well Diagnostics AS, Sykehusveien 23, Tromsø, 9035, Norway

    Liv Karen Johannessen

  2. Department of Telemedicine and eHealth, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway

    Gunnar Ellingsen

Authors
  1. Liv Karen Johannessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gunnar Ellingsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liv Karen Johannessen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johannessen, L.K., Ellingsen, G. Integration and Generification—Agile Software Development in the Healthcare Market. Comput Supported Coop Work 18, 607 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-009-9097-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-009-9097-8

Key words

Search

Navigation