Abstract
Education is increasingly enhanced by technology, and at the same time, the rapid pace of technology innovation and growing demand of consumers introduces challenges for providers of technological learning solutions. This paper investigates Finnish small and medium size companies who either develop or deliver technological solutions for education. Twelve companies were interviewed in order to capture the entrepreneurial narratives of successful design of learning solutions. Data was analyzed based on a conceptual framework. The framework draws on the situation awareness concept, meaning that we seek to answer the question how the participant enterprises examine relevant elements in their environment with regard to their development process. The results show that all the mature companies included in the study have well balanced situation awareness, but amongst the incubating and accelerating enterprises, balanced profiles are rare.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical view of the evidence. British Journal of Technology Education, 39(5), 775–786.
Berners-Lee, T. (2010). Long Live the Web: the call for continued open standards and neutrality. Scientific American November (22).
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Phildelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: Sage Publications Limited.
Boje, D. M. (2011). Our organizations were never disenchanted: enchantment by design narratives vs enchantment by emergence. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(4), 411–426.
Brush, C. G. (2008). Pioneering strategies for entrepreneurial success. Business Horizons, 51(1), 21–27.
Carr, D. (2007). Computer games in classrooms and the question of cultural baggage. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 526–528.
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3- d virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.
Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62(0), 18–23.
Durso, F. T., Nickerson, R. S., Schvaneveldt, R. W., Dumais, S. T., Lindsay, D. S., Chi, M. T. H. (Eds.). (1999). Situation awareness (Ch. 10, pp. 283–314). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Dutta, D. K., & Crossan, M. (2005). The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425–449.
Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: promises and challenges. ET Magazine, 1, 5–13.
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.
Flac, J. M. (1995). Situation awareness: proceed with caution. Human Factors, 37(1), 149–157.
Gartner, W. B. (1993). Words lead to deeds: towards an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 231–239.
Gartner, W. B. (2007). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 613–627.
Hannon, P. D., & Atherton, A. (1998). Small firm success and the art of orienteering: the value of plans, planning, and strategic awareness in the competitive small firm. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 5(2), 102–119.
Hjorth, D., & Steyaert, C. (2004). Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship: A second movements in entrepreneurship book. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Kearney, R. (2002). On stories. London: Routledge.
Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 316–321.
Lee, E. A.-L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442.
Lee, Y.-H., Waxman, H., Wu, J.-Y., & Lin, G. (2013). Revisit the effect of teaching and learning with technology. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 133–146.
Linder, S. P., Abbott, D., & Fromberger, M. J. (2006). An instructional scaffolding approach to teaching software design. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 238–250.
McKinsey. (2009). Shaping the future: How good education systems can become great in the decade ahead. Singapore: McKinsey & Company.
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: a ten- year review of empirical research. Computers & Education, 56, 769–780.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Mylläri, J. (2012). Towards mobile curriculum with systemic learning solutions. In M. Specht, J. Multisilta, & M. Sharples (Eds.), mLearn 2012 Conference Proceedings: 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 280–283). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
OECD (2011). PISA 2009 at a Glance. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-at-a-glance-2010_9789264095298-en. Accessed 25 Aug 2011.
Osawa, Y., & Miyazaki, K. (2006). An empirical analysis of the valley of death: large scale R&D project performance in a Japanese diversified company. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 14(2), 93–116.
Politis, D. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ attitudes towards failure: an experiential learning approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 15(4), 364–383.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Incorporated.
Romiszowski, A. J. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success of failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ, 44(1), 5–27.
Sainio, L.-M., & Puumalainen, K. (2007). Evaluating technology disruptiveness in a strategic corporate context: a case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1315–1333.
Sainio, L. M., Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2012). Constituents of radical innovation—exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty. Technovation, 32(11), 591.
Salden, R. J., Koedinger, K. R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Accounting for beneficial effects of worked examples in tutored problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 379–392.
Starr, L. (2010). The use of auto-ethnography in educational research: locating who we are in what we do. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 3(1), 1–9.
Stutsman, N. (2013). BYOD: one year later. Technology & Learning, 33(7), 36–39.
Watson, D. M. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 251–266.
WEF. (2010). The global competitiveness report 2010–2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
Acknowledgments
The research reported in this article has been funded by TEKES, SysTech programme. Grateful acknowledgement for proofreading and contributing valuable insights goes to Jennifer von Reis Saari
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niemelä, P., Isomöttönen, V. & Lipponen, L. Successful design of learning solutions being situation aware. Educ Inf Technol 21, 105–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9311-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9311-2