Abstract
An important research area in education and technology is how the learners use e-learning. By exploring the various factors and relationships between them, we can get an insight into the learners’ behaviors for delivering tailored e-content required by them. Although many tools exist to record detailed navigational activities, they don’t explore the learners’ usage patterns for an adaptive e-learning site. The previous web log data analyses, done so far, have been very limited in their scope as they lack detailed empirical results on the learning technology usage. This paper discusses the detailed results of a case study of web data mining in a specific e-learning application. The main objective of this study is to conduct research on usability and effectiveness of the e-content by analyzing the web log. For this, a suitable data set was retrieved from raw web log records, to which various web mining & statistical techniques could be applied. We have evaluated different features of e-content that can lead to better learning outcomes for the learners, by understanding their navigational behaviors, their interaction with system and their area of interest. We found, for example, what sequence of topics were the most liked and the least liked by the learners; we also found that these patterns, lead us to hypothesize, the correlation and regression analysis between the average time, test score and total attempts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anozie, N. O., & Junker, B. W. (2006). Predicting end-of-year accountability assessment scores from monthly student records in an online tutoring system. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Workshop on Educational Data Mining (AAAI-06), July 17.
Arroyo, I., Beal, C. R., Murray, T., Walles, R., & Woolf, B. P. (2004). Web-based intelligent multimedia tutoring for high stakes achievement. Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 7th International Conference (pp.468–477), ITS 2004, Springer
Baron, S, & Spiliopoulou, M. (2004). Monitoring the evolution of web usage. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978–3–540–30123–3_11.pdf.
Beck, J. E., Woolf, B. P., & Beal, C. R. (2000). ADVISOR: A machine learning architecture for intelligent tutor construction. Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial intelligence, 552–557.
Comunale, C. L., & Sexton, T. R. (2001–2002). The effectiveness of course Web sites in higher education: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(2), 171–190.
Cotton, D. R. E., & Grestya, K. A. (2007). The rhetoric and reality of e learning: using the think-aloud method to evaluate an online resource. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 583–600.
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.
Esichaikul, V, Lamnoi, S., & Bechter, C. (2011). Student modelling in adaptive e-learning systems, knowledge management & e-learning. An International Journal (KM&EL), 3.
Ezeife, C. I., Lu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2005) PLWAP sequential mining: open source code.
Feng, M., & Heffernan, N.T. (2005). Informing teachers live about student learning: Reporting in the ASSISTment System. The 12th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshop on Usage Analysis in Learning Systems.
Gao, T., & Lehman, J. D. (2003). The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 367–386.
Hardy, J., Antonioletti, M., & Bates, S. P. (2004). E-learner tracking: tools for discovering learner behaviour. The IASTED International Conference on Web-base Education.
Hellwege, J., Gleadow, A., & McNaught, C. (1996). Paperless lectures on the web: An evaluation of the educational outcomes of teaching Geology using the Web. Proceedings of 13th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary education.
Intratat, C. (2011). Alternatives for making language learning games more appealing for self-access learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 136–152.
MacQueen, J. B. (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of 5-th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1, 281–297.
Mahajan, R., Sodhi, J. S., & Mahajan, V. (2012). Mining user access patterns efficiently for adaptive e-learning environment. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2, 277–279.
McIsaac, M. S., & Blocher, J. M. (1999). Student and teacher perceptions of interaction in online computer-mediated communication. Educational Media International, v.36 n.2, 121–131.
Mobasher, B., Cooley, R., & Srivastava, J. (1997). Web mining: information and pattern discovery on the world wide web. Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 558–567.
Mostow, J., & Beck, J. (2006). Some useful tactics to modify, map, and mine data from intelligent tutors. Natural Language Engineering (Special Issue on Educational Applications), 12(2), 195–208.
Pei, J., Han, J., Mortazavi-asl, B., & Zhu, H. (2000). Mining access patterns efficiently from web logs. In Proceedings of the 4th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 396–407). Kyoto: Springer.
Peled, A., & Rashty, D. (1999). Logging for success: advancing the use of WWW logs to improve computer mediated distance learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(3).
Pritchard, D., & Warnakulasooriya, R. (2005). Data from a web-based homework tutor can predict student’s final exam score. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vol, no. 1 (pp. 2523–2529).
Romero, C., Ventura, S., & García, E. (2008a). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers & Education, 51, 368–384.
Romero, C., Ventura, S., & García, E. (2008b). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers & Education, 51, 368–384.
Sheard, J., Albrecht, D., & Butbul, E. (2005). ViSION: Visualization student interactions online. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian World Wide Web Conference, pp. 48–58.
Sia, K., Cho, J., Hino, K., Chi, Y., & Tseng, S. (2007). Monitoring RSS feeds based on user browsing pattern. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 161–168.
Vaarandi, R. (2003). A data clustering algorithm for mining patterns from. IEEE IPOM’03 Proceedings, pp. 119–126.
Valsamidis, S., & Democritus, S. K. (2011). E-learning platform usage analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 185–204.
Vanijja, V., & Supattathum, M. (2006). Statistical analysis of eLearning usage in a university. Third International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society.
Yadav, D., & Choubey, A. (2012). E-learning: current state of art and future prospects. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 9, 490–499.
Zhu, J. J. H., Stokes, M., & Lu, A. X. Y. (2000). The use and effects of web-based instruction: evidence from a single-source study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2), 197–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahajan, R., Sodhi, J.S. & Mahajan, V. Usage patterns discovery from a web log in an Indian e-learning site: A case study. Educ Inf Technol 21, 123–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9312-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9312-1