Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies for effective faculty involvement in online activities aimed at promoting critical thinking and deep learning

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Highly-traditional education systems that mainly offer what is known as direct instruction usually result in graduates with a surface approach to learning rather than a deep one. What is meant by deep-learning is learning that involves critical analysis, the linking of ideas and concepts, creative problem solving, and application (Harvey & Kamvounias, Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 31–41, doi:10.1080/07294360701658716 2008)- all of which prepare graduates for life in the 21st Century. It is precisely this kind of deep learning that the current national educational reform initiatives in Bahrain are trying to promote, in contrast to what has usually been offered historically. Unfortunately, this noble aim is not always achieved and teaching methods need to be examined and developed, since there definitely are a lot of alternatives to stereotype lecturing in academic institutions (Annerstedt, Garza, Huang-DeVoss, Lindh & Rydmark, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 107–127, 2010). One such alternative suggested in this paper is that of increasing faculty involvement with students in online contexts, as a means for promoting critical thinking and deep learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Razzak, N. (2012). Problem-based learning in the educational psychology classroom: Bahraini teacher candidates’ experience. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdul Razzak, N. (2013). Challenges facing school leadership in promoting ICT integration in instruction in the public schools of Bahrain. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9283-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annerstedt, C., Garza, D., Huang-DeVoss, C., Lindh, J., & Rydmark, M. (2010). Research-able through problem-based learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, B. (2009). Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astleitner, H. (2002). Teaching critical thinking online. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(2), 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckem, J. M., II, & Watkins, M. (2012). Bringing life to learning: immersive experiential learning simulations for online and blended course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M. (2004). Conducting problem-based learning on-line. international conference on computers in education 2004. Retrieved March 31st, 2014 from http://plum.yuntech.edu.tw/icce2004/Theme3?063_Bhattacharya.pdf

  • Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian council for educational research.

  • BlackBoard Institute (2011). Closing the gap between high school and college: a research report. [Online] Available from- www.blackboardinstitute.com. [Accessed 13 September 2014].

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. T., Grady, M., & McMann, G. (1994). Interaction analysis of an inter-university computer conference. Paper presented a the distance learning research conference. Texas: College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. S. (2012). Student technological creativity using online problem-solving activities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 803–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, C. M., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Online discussion and critical thinking skills: a case study in a Singapore secondary school. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2005). Factors affecting learners’ satisfaction on the use of asynchronous online discussion in a hypermedia design environment. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 5(1&2), 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L. (2001). Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.). Virginia: Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, D. E., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: essentials of web-based education. Madison: Atwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., & Kamvounias, P. (2008). Bridging the implementation gap: a teacher-as-learner approach to teaching and learning policy. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(1), 31–41. doi:10.1080/07294360701658716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Evaluating the participation and quality of thinking of pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion environment: Part II. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, S. (2000). Web teaching guide: a practical approach to creating course web sites. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S. J. (2009). Exploration of secondary students” creativity by integrating web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum. Computers and Education, 52, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2011). The developing field of technology education: a review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open line networks: learning experiences during a massive open line course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, J., & Gorski, P. (2007). Countering standardization. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. (2001). Computer conferencing and assessment: new ways of writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: a longitudinal study. Computers and Education, 49(2), 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. C. R., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: an investigation of student facilitation techniques. New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Argente-Linares, E. (2013). The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 61, 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumney, M., Frederickson, K., Spark, A., & McDuffie, G. (2008). Facilitating critical thinking through online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 4, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandernach, B. J. (2006). Thinking critically about critical thinking: integrating online tools to promote critical thinking. Insight: A Collection of Faculty Scholarship, 1, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurino, P. S. (2007). Looking for critical thinking in online threaded discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J. (2009). Assessment: focusing on the learner and the subject. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 445–447). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murchu, D. & Muirhead, B. (2005). Insights into promoting critical thinking in online classes. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(6). Accessed on March 31st, 2014 from http://itdl.org/Journal/Jun_05/article01.htm.

  • Paulsen, M.F. (1995). Moderating educational computer conferences. In Z. L. Berge and M.P. Collins (Eds.), Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: Vol.3. Distance Learning (pp.81-89). Cresskill, NJ Hampton Press, Inc.

  • Stewart, W. (2014). School leavers lack the critical thinking skills needed for university, exam board warns [Online] 25 January 2014. Available from- http://news.tes.co.uk/b/news/2014/01/24/students-lack-critical-skills.aspx. [Accessed: 14 September 2014].

  • Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, J. (1991). Critical and creative thinking in the classroom. In D. Gough & National Association of Elementary School Principals, A. A. (Eds.), Thinking about thinking. Research Roundup.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bahrain Teachers’ College, University of Bahrain, Sakhir Campus, P.O.Box 32038, Zallaq, Bahrain

    Nina Abdul Razzak

Authors
  1. Nina Abdul Razzak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Abdul Razzak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdul Razzak, N. Strategies for effective faculty involvement in online activities aimed at promoting critical thinking and deep learning. Educ Inf Technol 21, 881–896 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9359-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9359-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation