Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A model driven framework to address challenges in a mobile learning environment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a review of the pedagogical, technological, policy and research challenges and concepts underlying mobile learning is presented, followed by a brief description of categories of implementations. A model Mobile learning framework and dynamic criteria for mobile learning implementations are proposed, along with a case study of one site that is used to illustrate how the proposed model can be applied. Implementation challenges including pedagogical challenges, technological challenges, policy challenges, and research challenges are described. These align well with the themes of EduSummIT 2013 that hosted the dialogue resulting in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aderinoye, R. A., Ojokheta, K.O., Olojede, A. A. (2007). Integrating mobile learning into nomadic education programmes in Nigeria: Issues and perspectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/.

  • Ali, A., Ouda, A., & Capretz, L. (2012). A conceptual framework for measuring the quality aspects of m-learning. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 14(4), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ally, M. (2013). Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2). http://lthe.zu.ac.ae.

  • Boulos, M. N., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., & Jones, R. (2011). How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomedical Engineering Online, 10(1), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. (2014). Los Angeles school district to shift away from Apple’s iPad to Windows, Chromebook. http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/07/01/los-angeles-school-district-to-shift-away-from-apples-ipad-windows-chromebook.

  • Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook for information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2014). The technology proficiency self-assessment questionnaire (TPSA): Evolution of a self-efficacy measure for technology integration. In T. Brinda, N. Reynolds & R. Romeike (Eds.) Proceedings of KEYCIT 2014 – Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT, 2014, pp. 190–196.

  • Christensen, R., & Williams, M. (2015). Teacher and student perceptions during the first year of a one-to-one mobile learning initiative. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1428–1433). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Ciampa, K. (2013). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

  • Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly, 2, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Donelly, C. (2013). Innovation Drives Lab School @ Punahou. Punahou News, July 23, 2013.

  • Elias, T. (2011). Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2).

  • Faille, M. & Morrison, K. (2013). Rise of the mobile phone. National Post, April 5, 2013. http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/05/graphic-rise-of-the-mobile-phone/.

  • Frohberg, D., Goth, C., & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile learning projects – a critical analysis of the state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 307–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., & Christensen, R. (1999). Concerns-Based Adoption Model Levels of Use of an Innovation (CBAM-LOU). Adapted from Hall, Loucks, Rutherford, & Newlove (1975). Denton: Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: a framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. W. (2011). Education beyond the cloud: anytime-anywhere learning in a smart campus environment. In Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), 2011 International Conference (pp. 718–723). IEEE.

  • Hsu, H., Wang, S., & Cormac, L. (2008). Using audio blogs to assist English-language learning: an investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (2010). Measuring the information society 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU. http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ict/material/FactsFigures2010.pdf.

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of a participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaddage, F. (2013). The iPad global embrace! Are we branding mobile learning?. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1, 3234–3240.

  • Khaddage, F., & Cosío, J. H. (2014). Trends and barriers on the fusion of mobile apps in higher education where to next and how? In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 903–909). Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). iLearn via mobile technology: A comparison of mobile learning attitudes among university Students in two nations. Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). Beijing, China.

  • Khaddage, F., & Lattemann, C. (2013). The future of mobile apps for teaching and learning. In Z. Berge & L. Muilen-burg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning: Definitions (pp. 119–128). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaddage, F., & Zeidan, F. (2012) iPad in Education in the Middle East, Ready or Not? A College Case Study. Published in: Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2012 15th International Conference, E-ISBN : 978-1-4673-2426-7 DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2012.6402161.

  • Khaddage, F., Lanham, E., & Zhou, W. (2009). A mobile learning model for universities: re-blending the current learning environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 3(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2013). measuring factors that influence teachers’ willingness in using mobile phone in the classroom. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 3730–3737). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. http://www.editlib.org/p/48689.

  • Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25–47). Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf M., & Oksman E (2012). Native, HTML5, or hybrid: understanding your mobile application development options. http://wiki.developerforce.com/.

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Sharples, M. (2009). Editorial: mobile and contextual learning. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 159–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., Khaddage, F., Knezek, G. (2013). Blending student technology experiences in formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

  • Looi, C., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: the journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers & Education, 71, 222–236.

  • Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269–287.

  • Looi, C.-K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2010). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 515–525.

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudge JT. (2012). Native app vs. Mobile web app: A quick comparison six revisions, useful information for web developers and designers website available online from: http://sixrevisions.com/mobile/native-app-vs-mobile-web-app-comparison/ [last accessed October 2012].

  • Nagel, D. (2014). One-third of U.S. students use school-issued mobile devices. THE Journal. Available http://thejournal.com/Articles/2014/04/08/A-Third-of-Secondary-Students-Use-School-Issued-Mobile-Devices.aspx?m=2&p=1.

  • Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2011). Learning and schooling in the age of mobilism. Educational Technology, 51(6), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2013). Los Angeles’ 640,000 iPad purchase: too big to fail. THE Journal.

  • Pachler, N. (2009). Research methods in mobile and informal learning: Some issues. In G. Vavoula., N. Pachler, A. Kukulska-Hulme (eds.). Researching Mobile Learning (pp. 1–15). Peter Lang.

  • PBS & Grunwald Associates LLC. (2010). Deepening connections: teachers’ increasingly rely on media and technology. Available: http://www.pbs.org/about/media/about/cms_page_media/182/PBS-Grunwald-2011e.pdf.

  • Project Tomorrow. (2010). Project K-Nect evaluation report. Irvine: Project Tomorrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Tomorrow. (2011). Speak-up national findings, K-12 students and parents report. Irvine: Project Tomorrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up. (2011). Learning in the 21st century. Mobile devices + social media = personalized learning. Washington: Blackboard K-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up. (2014). The new digital learning playbook: Understanding the spectrum of students’ activities and aspirations. Irving: Project Tomorrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (1996). Teacher change in technology-rich classrooms. In C. Fisher, D. C. Dwyer, & K. Yocam (Eds.), Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms (pp. 281–299). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilhamer, R., Chen, B., Sugar, A. (2013). A framework for implementing mobile technology. In Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

  • Sha, L., Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B. (2011). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpes, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, F. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff et al. (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. Proceedings of mLearn 2005, 1(1), 1–9.

  • Shih, K., Chen, H., Chang, C., & Kao, T. (2010). The development and implementation of scaffolding-based self-regulated learning system for e/m-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone ownership – 2013 update. Retrieved June 24, 2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Smartphone-Ownership-2013/Findings.aspx.

  • Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook for information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John’s Curriculum Goes 1:1 with iPads for Fall 2013. http://www.stjohnschs.org/podium/default.aspx?t=204&id=655956.

  • Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning. The moving finger writes and having writ…. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 8(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • UB Custom Publishing Group (2012). Abilene Christian University mobilizes learning with smartphones, University Business.

  • Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 81–102.

  • UNESCO. (2012). Working paper series on mobile learning: Turning on mobile learning in North America. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (Eds.) (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 20). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Williams, B., & Bearman, M. (2008). Podcasting lectures: the next silver bullet? Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 6(3), 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, N. (2006). What is mobile learning. In M. Sharples (ed.). Big issues in mobile learning (pp. 5–9). University of Nottingham.

  • Wu, W.-H., Wu, J., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: a meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59, 817–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. H., Krauskopf, P. B., Gaylord, N. M., Ward, A., Huffstutler-Hawkins, S., & Goodwin, L. (2010). Cooperative m-learning with nurse practitioner students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. R. (2011). Smartphones on campus: the search for ‘killer’ apps. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B6–B8.

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University School of I.T., Melbourne, Australia

    Ferial Khaddage

  2. University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

    Rhonda Christensen, Gerald Knezek & Cathie Norris

  3. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Wing Lai

  4. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Elliot Soloway

Authors
  1. Ferial Khaddage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhonda Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wing Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerald Knezek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cathie Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elliot Soloway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferial Khaddage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaddage, F., Christensen, R., Lai, W. et al. A model driven framework to address challenges in a mobile learning environment. Educ Inf Technol 20, 625–640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9400-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9400-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation