Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the antecedents of social networking sites use among CEGEP students

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigations in technology acceptance in education has largely overlooked certain unique populations like students from the Collège d’enseignement général et professionnel (CEGEP) system. In studies examining CEGEP students’ use of technology, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) perspective has not been taken into account, nor have modalities of beliefs underlying the TAM framework. Modalities of belief refer to the different way of knowing something, such as certainty, necessity, conditionality/probability, etc. This study explores CEGEP students’ use of social networking sites (SNSs) employing the TAM framework proposed by Davis (MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340, 1989). The increased role of SNSs like Facebook in the digital experience and lives of college students offers novel venues and presents new opportunities for technology acceptance research. This study examines the determinants of intention and use of SNSs among CEGEP students and includes a new antecedent factor ‘need for self-expression’, as a modality of belief. Using structural equation modeling, specifically partial least squares (PLS), we test and present the results finding good fit with the data for our extended TAM model for Facebook use. We close by discussing the implications, limitations, and avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information Management, 43(6), 706-717. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W., & Lee, C. (2013). Trust as a learning facilitator that affects students’ learning performance in the Facebook community: An investigation in a business planning writing course. Computers & Education, 62, 320-327. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Information Management, 30, 269-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, G., & Chung, H. (2013). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Social Networking Sites (SNS): Impact of Subjective Norm and Social Capital on the Acceptance of SNS. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 29(10), 619-628. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.756333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). ECAR National Study of Students and Information Technology in Higher Education. EDUCUASE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishaw, M., & Strong, D. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information Management, 36(1), 9-21. doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00101-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, M. (2015). The Demographics of Social Media Users. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech Retrieved 28 January 2016, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, R., & Duncan-Howell, J. (2008). Facebook goes to college: Using social networking tools to support students undertaking teaching practicum. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 596-601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson, J. (2016). "Modal Logic", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Spring 2016 Edition, URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/logic-modal/, accessed: July 2016.

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 2-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2015). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9446-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in International Marketing (pp. 277-320). Bingley: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662-676. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The Relationship Between Facebook and the Well-Being of Undergraduate College Students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking, 14(4), 183-189. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information Management, 35(3), 237-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E., Xin Xu, S., & Zhang, N. (2015). Psychological Ownership Motivation and Use of Social Media. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 186-207. doi:10.1080/10696679.2015.1002336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karvounidis, T., Chimos, K., Bersimis, S., & Douligeris, C. (2014). Evaluating Web 2.0 technologies in higher education using students’ perceptions and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(6), 577-596. doi:10.1111/jcal.12069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information Management, 43, 740-755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2015a). WarpPLS. Retrieved from http://www.warppls.com

  • Kock, N. (2015b). WarpPLS 5.0 user manual. ScripWarp Systems. Retrieved from http://cits.tamiu.edu/WarpPLS/UserManual_v_5_0.pdf

  • Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K., & Larsen, K. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and, future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752-780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information Management, 40(3), 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K., & Lu, H. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manca, S. & Ranieri, M. (2015). Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9429-x

  • McFarland, D. J., & Hamilton, D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 427-447. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsroom (2016). Company Info | Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved 20 June 2016, from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/

  • Pempek, T., Yermolayeva, Y., & Calvert, S. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2015). U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015. Retrieved 18 February 2016, from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/03/PI_Smartphones_0401151.pdf

  • Porter, C., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999-1007. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Hoyos, C., Haya, I., & Fernández-Díaz, E. (2015). Research on SNS and education: the state of the art and its challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 100-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information Management, 44(1), 90-103. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4).

  • Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media And. Technology, 34(2), 157-174. doi:10.1080/17439880902923622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E. B. (1988). Information system implementation: Bridging the gap between design and utilization. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2014). Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: the role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.917110.

  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: Applying and extending the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tess, P. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) - a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60-A68. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125. doi:10.2307/249443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: why We expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Media Update (2014). Social Media Update. Retrieved 9 April 2016, from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf

  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. (2009). Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451-481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Scown, P., Urquhart, C., & Hardman, J. (2012). Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 21-39. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9206-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. In K. Joreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation (pp. 1-54). Amsterdam: Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tenzin Doleck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doleck, T., Bazelais, P. & Lemay, D.J. Examining the antecedents of social networking sites use among CEGEP students. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2103–2123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9535-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9535-4

Keywords

Navigation